Thursday, 9 July 2009

THE PEASANTS REVOLT

THE POWERLESS CHALLENGE POWER

The Weak and Vulnerable

Strike Back at the Heart of Darkness.

“It’s more than rain that falls on our parade today
It’s more than thunder, it’s more than thunder
And it’s more than a bad dream now that I’m sober
Nothing but woe-begotten grey skies now.”


‘More Than Rain’

Tom Waits.

Those typically bleak-to-the-point-of-being-funny words from a song by my favourite musician, Tom Waits, pulsed through my mind in the brief moments of silence in between our shouted protests - which – oh so “rudely” - crashed into one of the Jersey oligarchy’s great plastic pageants this morning.

With all the “politeness” of a savage beating from Al McGuire -

With all the “appropriateness” of a bottle of Dettol poured down a child’s throat by Jane McGuire -

With all the “discretion” of a right-hook to the head of a 14 year-old, administered by Tom McKeon -

With all the “confiscating” of innocence - as inflicted on vulnerable children by the States of Jersey for decades –

With all the “respectability” of a broken arm inflicted by Mario Lundy –

With all the “responsibility” of Francis Hamon, telling a headmaster – ‘whilst they play a game of squash’ - to ignore complaints of child abuse –

With all the “compassion” of Jurat John Le Breton – trying to intimidate child victims of abuse into withdrawing their complaints – by humiliating them in front of their parents –

With all the “decency” of the Dean, openly forbidding his clergy to offer support to abuse victims – and protecting an abusing church warden couple -

With all the “kindness” of a traditional Catholic battering from Mrs. Bonner -

With all the “consideration” of a deliberately detached glucose drip – with a bung inserted in the end -

The survivors struck-back.

Today Michael Birt – former Jersey Attorney General – was sworn-in as the replacement ‘Bailiff’ – the hopelessly conflicted post of head of judiciary, and speaker of the island’s parliament.

“Politeness – uber alles” – may as well be the motto of the Jersey oligarchy.

To quote John Bale, “Though it be a foul lie; set it a good face.”

No matter what wretched atrocities are committed - and tolerated – and pro-actively hidden - by Jersey’s “Great And Good” – it simply isn’t “The Jersey Way” to speak the truth about them.

So – no matter the betrayed children – the destroyed lives – the suicides – the human wreckage – the perversions of justice – the massed-ranks of Jersey’s “polite” gradually accreted upon the States building this morning - to engage in a orgiastic ceremony of Groupthink - by which they attempted to deflect reality by wearing fancy-dress – and parading to impress the peasants and the plebs.

About 15 of us gathered in the Royal Square to begin some small protest against both Birt as an individual, and against the stagnant and defective “justice” apparatus in Jersey. And as the “polite” gradually arrived the smugness was palpable. Many of the lawyers in particular openly laughed at the survivors as they filtered into the building.

But we proles well and truly rained on their parade.

Our protest was so strong – heartfelt – and loud – that it was audible throughout the building during their delusory exercise in self-congratulation.

But such vulgarity hasn’t – hitherto – happened in Jersey during these “great” events. The expected procedure is for the adoring masses to turn-out and tug their forelocks in deference to their social “superiors”.

The culture-shock was palpable.

Eventually – realising we weren’t going to go away – the assembled “dignitaries” – amongst their number, lawyers, politicians, judiciary, jurats, estate agents and journalists - blinking and wide-eyed with shock – exited the building in preparation for their parade to the Town Church – where they’d hear a sermon – to the effect of how wonderful they all were – and what a load of scummy rabble we were – from Bob Key.

And as this toxic amalgam spewed forth like some vast, advancing slime-mould I was struck by the sense we were witnessing a step-change – a tipping-point - in Jersey political culture.

I looked across the assembled faces and just couldn’t help noticing that so much of the hauteur, the contempt, the confidence, the sense of invulnerability as displayed as they entered the building - had drained away.

Though a number of them tried to put on a brave face – rictus grins – and embarrassed attempts to applaud Birt and his entourage – one got the strong impression that even these entrenched oligarchs may have finally – in the year 2009 – caught their first glimpses of advancing reality.

Our chanting, whistles, drumming on the bins – was more than thunder.

It was something more than rain which fell on their parade.

Though they’ll have been toasting one another with Champaign and wine all day – in an effort to blot-out our vulgar intrusion into their fantasies – it will be more than a bad dream when they’re sober.

Today – after more than eight hundred years of unopposed and abused power – the culture of deference was finally put to the sword.

As far as Jersey’s oligarchy are concerned – it is, metaphorically, “nothing but woe-begotten grey skies now.”

For the rest of us – it’s a bright new dawn.

Today – people who have been powerless, ignored, abused, regarded as irrelevant and betrayed by the States of Jersey – struck at the heart of the posturing plastic fakery of the island’s power-apparatus.

And did so with all the subtlety of a Lenny Harper memo – or the tact and diplomacy of a Stuart Syvret e-mail.

As a formerly powerless abuse survivor remarked to me at the end of the protest –

“God – that was good.”

Stuart.

315 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   1 – 200 of 315   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

My God - it WAS!

Anonymous said...

Wish I'd been there

Anonymous said...

Can anyone point me in the direction of any proof (ie JEP article or similar) that the Dean forbade the clergy to support cild abuse victims and did nothing to stop the abusing could. I assume you mean Bob Key by the Dean?

Anonymous said...

I attended the Royal Square today to observe and have an open mind to the views of the posters on this site and my general leaning towards the people that this site is against. I was quite surprised how few people showed up. I accept today is a working day. The whistle blowing was a little weak and the chanting was too infrequent to be effective. When the trumpets and the general applause from advocates and States members started the protest was drowned out. Did this do the cause any good? Did this do Mr Syvrets popularity any good? I regret to say that in my opinion then it is no on both counts. Do the people who have undoubtedly suffered hurt,physical and mentally, have reason to be angry then yes but I have to say "the vast majority" of Jersey's population aren't really bothered. Sure they may tut as they read or hear the stories but "the vast majority" are too self centred and only care really about their lives and not the problems from the past as they have no personal contact.
I am sorry if I have upset people but as I say this is my opinion and of course I respect you and your readers. Thank goodness we can have difference of opinion and debate in this Island of ours.
Thank you for reading this and you have the strength and patience to carry on.

Mac said...

Well written Stuart, I'm glad to have been one of the great unwashed plebs there today, my ears are still ringing.

Senator Stuart Syvret said...

The protest was great,

The mere fact it happened - and they had to get the band in - and the lawyers had to applaud - to try and drown us out - is a sign of success.

And what was both encouraging - and disturbing - were the sheer numbers of ordinary people who stood and witnessed the protest - and would discreetly say to protesters 'we'd love to openly join you - but we're worried about our jobs, housing etc or other retributions.'

But people are taking courage now - now that they''ve tatsed people-power.

Stuart

Grim reaper said...

yahoo! When's the next protest Stuart? Heard the noise whilst driving through town this morning. Nice one.

Anonymous said...

I don't always agree with you Stuart but you don't half talk some sense some of the time
Its time our island was returned to the Jersey people and the people in the big house were made to understand what it's like in the real world!
We need more people like you who are willing to argue for the little people!
Now can you get them to do something about prices?

Senator Stuart Syvret said...

When's the next protest?

Don't know for sure - these things have to be a group decision.

But Barking Bill's swearing-in as Deputy Bailff has to be a runner.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

The "Jersey Evening Post" reports that the Connetable of St Helier wants to rename James Street.

Young Steve wants it to commemorate the island's close connections with Madeira. I would suggest, however, that Constable Cowcroft looks closer to home.

The new street name should fulfill the following criteria:

** It should be in English or (preferably) French

** It should be easy for everybody to pronounce

** It should commemorate something with local connections.

I therefore propose that a Madeiran connection should be shelved and that James Street be renamed RUE HAUT DE LA GARENNE.

H.A.

Anonymous said...

In my opinion, the Jersey Bailiff = unelected puppet master and protector of establishment self-interests...

Welcome to our world - aka the Bailiwick of Jersey in 2009!

Enjoy...

Anonymous said...

I worked with he who cant be named
It was in a nursing home run by an ex politician

Senator Stuart Syvret said...

How many frail elderly do you reckon he killed there?

I've heard from diffrent sources that it wasn't just the 13 on Corbier Ward.

He appears to have left a trail of death wherever he worked.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Barking Bill's swear in
Woof Woof F**K

Anonymous said...

Such a shame that an onlooker found the Peasants Revolt a little distasteful. People found Dr Martin Luther King distasteful when he fought tooth and nail for Civil Rights for Black Americans. That man is now put on a pedestal as one of the greatest contributors to Civil Rights in the 20th century, your following in his footsteps Stuart, even with your dirty old trainers.

I am not too sure if you found it a little distasteful for an elected Senator to wash the dirty linen of the Establishments failure of their duty of care to the abused, surpressed and the downright failure of Human Rights distasteful also in a farcical ceremony to install a man who himself is responsible for the failure of Justice in Jersey. I feel the good senator is to be applauded not condemned.

In the same way I found it distasteful that Old Rassy, he of many words seemed to consider the good Senators manner of dress more important than the issues for which he was demonstrating. Shame on you ole rassy, I always considered you to be a fair minded person, but obviously your spending too much time with the rest of the half-wits on Planet Jersey. I will add not all are half wits, some do have the ability to think for themselves but are held to redicule for their freedom of speech, but par for the course I suppose on the Island of Jersey.

So Stuart a new begining in Jersey today - the pomp and ceremony was interupted by those who had the courage to speak out, or whistle and whatever to let THEM know times they are a changing.

It is time that the dirty washing of the Establishment was taken to the public wash house and hung out to dry. It is time that Jersey moved into the 21st century - the days of the Laird and his hidden secrets are over, the days of dictating and other wrongdoings to the peasants are over, it is everyones right to be heard, you cannot continue piling the muck under the carpets, you will find muck shovellers demand rights also these days.

Incidently Ole Rassy, your sentiments relating to "Northerners" couldn;t be further from the truth. You ought to get out more, your spending just a little too much time with your like minded half wit friends on Planet Jersey. Your having problems finding where you are at the moment, carrots and rabbits come to mind.

Web Guru said...

Stuart Syvret to be charged over Jersey child abuse blog

Anonymous said...

Who Stuart? Name the names. Stop shying away from it. Why leave people guessing about identities of hospital workers?

Anonymous said...

Monty has the right idea, he just needs to grow some balls and come out from behind Stuart to lead the way. Any info on his mothers i.d. ?

Anonymous said...

It's good to see positive action has finally arrived in Jersey.

Now maybe the fancy dress club will start to realise this is 2006, not 1806.

Web Guru said...

Jersey whistleblower on data protection offences

Anonymous said...

Note -

I see, unless I am mistaken, the statement by Iruka has been removed.



I wonder why??????????
Hope someone made a copy!!!!!!!!!!!

Could it be an offence against Data Protection. Whoooppppppppppppppssssssssssss

Anonymous said...

Do you think the powers that be are now on the phone to the CIA warning of Stuart Syvret possessing whistles of mass damnation?

Anonymous said...

Channel Report Video

Excellent Stuart and co!

Senator Stuart Syvret said...

What makes you think they're Jersey hospital workers?

In any event - one never reveals one's sources.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Different sources - not the leaky old police station then!

Anonymous said...

Mr Nonny Mouse,

"I am sorry if I have upset people"

Well, you haven't upset me - it made me laugh, your clumsy peabrained feeble attempt at negative propaganda.

I do hope that I haven't offended you by saying that.

Zoompad

Anonymous said...

The only way Jersey can recover from its creepy paedophile protecting reputation is for every decent person there to show up at once to protest the outrageous mistreatment of the child abuse survivors. Sorry if this seems impolite to say, but only by demonstrating that the majority actually care about the innocents will outsiders believe Jersey is worthy of anything more than the world's utter contempt.

Anonymous said...

The "nurse who cannot be named" has already been outed in this blog.

Just trawl through "back numbers" and you will find him.

Anonymous said...

You really are an idiot sometimes.

I went through an horrendous childhood because of the schools system, not in care, with pyschopathic teachers who ruined my education.

Nevertheless that does not stop one being clever.

However your always right attitude is appalling.

Michael Birt, even though my education was ruined was one of my first employers, and saw through a lack of qualifications caused by the local teaching system, etc.

What is your alternative to society and justice? None.

Maybe instead of blaming lawyers and prosecutors, the fact is they cannot get the evidence so will not get a prosecution. Your ire should be directed at the education system who continue to produce arrogant bullies.

Anonymous said...

Stuart

That "Mass Murderer" blog of yours 19th March, the one you nearly lost your freedom for.
There is no way that it can be hidden away, forgotten or destroyed, not now that its all over the world.
So what action is being, or going to be taken on it?

Anonymous said...

Stuart Syvret - Whistle Blower - quite literally!

Congratulation for using your democratic right to protest, peole have lost their lives to ensure that youo have such a right.


It has been a long time coming and I urge bloggers to write to the rag in praise of the brave people who stood up to be counted yesterday in the Royal Square.

I for one salute you!

TonyTheProf said...

The CTV report showed the protestors briefly, but with the part inside the Royal Court, they certainly could not be heard outside.

Anonymous said...

Even easier, go to Stuarts Blog Archive, March, go down for 19th March and read the whole thing regarding 'He who shall not be named'

According to the 'Independant' this is the secret Police report referred to in the data protection charges.

Anonymous said...

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/jersey-senator-charged-with-data-offences-1738367.html

Good article here, sorry can't do links, copy & paste please.

voiceforchildren said...

Stuart.

Perhaps a demonstration could be organised at the Education department?

Anonymous said...

News Reaches UK of Senator Arrest in Tinpot Dictatorship

Anonymous said...

Well done for the protest,could be the start of something big.

Would someone please tell the Ballache & Co protectanonce club that the feudal system is long gone,even here.

Gone too are the days when the sight of our "social betters" dressed as a japanese admiral-or sweating in father xmas costume- will suffice to maintain the status quo.

Micheal the natives are more than restless,and as for that bloody band...Puurrleese!.

Seriously,roll on ECHR.

Anonymous said...

Ok, if he has already been named, why the secrecy?????

Anonymous said...

Watching Channel Report last night it was nice to see you back in 1992 shaking hands with good old Vern :)

Anonymous said...

So they're threatening a court order to remove the leaked police report from the web? How do they expect to do that when copies of your blog entries can reappear all over the internet as easily as an oli cover up?

I suspect they're going to try to get blogger.com to take down your blog - however futile that would be!

It'll take more than that to silence you!

Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Part 1 of 2:

I’m described above as an idiot – for not agreeing that Michael Birt is a wonderful chap – and for not criticising teachers – and for not having an alternative.

The strands of that argument are wrong.

Firstly – I’m not positing an “alternative to society and justice” – what on Earth that may be.

On the contrary – I am simply campaigning for society and justice.

I’m seeking in Jersey simply the same levels of impartiality, professionalism, integrity, objectivity and effective checks and balances – as have been provided by the prosecution systems and judiciary and courts of most respectable western democracies for a very long time indeed.

By attempting to maintain the paternalistic farrago of over-priced, incompetent, politicised, biased and defective “justice” that exists in Jersey at present – it is you who are arguing against “society and justice”.

Michael Birt is not a “nice chap”.

Rather like the Bailhache Brothers, he exhibits all the characteristics of an over-grown spoilt brat – utterly divorced from engagement with reality – and incapable of intellectually and emotionally dealing with disagreement, debate or defiance. Perhaps it’s something to do with private schools and being raised by nannies – but these people appear wholly incapable of grasping the concept of sometimes – just occasionally – not getting their own way – or of the fact they’re simply often wrong in the things they do and say.

Let me give you just a few examples of Birt in action.

In the early 1990’s when he was Attorney General, he cancelled at the last moment a meeting I and a marine biologist were going to have with him in order to explain the straightforward criminality of the States of Jersey in dumping hundreds of thousands of tonnes of toxic incinerator ash into the marine environment.

Basically – he didn’t want to prosecute the States – not good for the “image”, you see?

In 1998 – in the face of utterly overwhelming evidence and witness testimony – he abandoned the prosecution of the child abusing maniacs, the McGuires.

Why? (a) they would have spilt their guts in court, and brought down the entire child “protection” apparatus of Jersey; and (b) it would all have been terribly embarrassing for the reputation of Jersey’s establishment.

Around the same time – and again in the teeth of overwhelming evidence – he failed to prosecute those who had spent the previous decade concealing child abuse at Victoria College. Just think how terribly damaging that would have been to the oligarchy – and we just couldn’t have that – could we?

I mean, if Mad Frankie Hamon had received the much-deserved jail sentence – who would have administered the oath to Birt yesterday?

As Deputy Bailiff, Birt repeatedly allowed the then P & R Committee to destroy our propositions on the machinery of government by lodging amendments that negatived the proposals.

Incidentally – he is doing the very same at the moment – in respect of my proposition on freedom of speech for abuse survivors.

And, in 2007, he endorsed and supported the Council of Ministers’ abandonment of due process to enable them to ‘fast-track’ their dismissal meeting against me – thus leaving me with only 5 day’s notice - and not in receipt of the ‘case’ against me until less than 24 hours before the meeting.

I’ll explain a few more issues in Part 2.

Stuart

Jersey Needs Justice said...

"Not only must Justice be done; it must also be seen to be done."

The corollary must be :
"Not only must Injustice not be done; it must also be seen to have been made as difficult as possible."

That's why the dual-roles must go. Even if the dual roles have never been a problem in practice, they must go so that there's no possibility of abuse AND so that it's plain to see that steps have been taken to remove such possible conflicts.

THE PINBALL WIZARD said...

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/sunday-life/lundy-urged-to-stand-down-over-abuse-case-14048926.html

Zoompad said...

I have just been re-reading the 19th March post, and I hope that everyone else will do so as well.

I do have friends, lets call them Mr and Mrs Bigmouth BlogBlabbers, in the Basingstoke area, who use that hospital, and so I think it is very important that they see this information, so I am really very grateful to Bailhache for hassling you, Stuart, because if they hadn't arrested you on this trumped up data protection charge, I might never have looked at that post again, and had the opportunity of passing it on to my friends.

Thanks, Jersey Oligary, for all the harassment - you are doing a great job of ensuring that the whole UK knows about the evil things you have been trying to conceal.

Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Part 2.

Let me refer you to my blog entry of the 19th March.

Have good read of that posting – and the police report – and then try and imagine grounds for not prosecuting.

Setting aside the overwhelming case described – I have since had further corroboration put to me of the immense danger posed by the individual in question.

In this type of case – where you are dealing with a person who’s profession leaves them in positions of immense power over extremely vulnerable people – there is only one, credible, course of action – and that is to prosecute.

Guilt or innocence would be determined by the court; but matters of such horrifying gravity cannot be dealt with by one man making a decision behind closed doors. A trial is always required in such well-evidenced cases.

Not least for the simple and obvious public interest objective of alerting the world to the potential dangers posed by the individual – even if acquitted.

No. This case was dropped because of the vast and scandalous controversy which would have flowed from a trial – and all the resultant damage to Jersey’s public administration.

I’m afraid your notion of Birt as some kind of ‘good Samaritan’ – because he helped you notwithstanding your lack of education – just doesn’t square with the experiences of 98% of us in the same condition.

Which brings me to your point about teachers. Though I am reliably informed that such things as good teachers exist – I never encountered a single, solitary one throughout my entire “education”.

And you’re quite right – bad teachers and bad schools wreck lives – and I have said so on many occasions. And I can say so through personal experience, because that’s what happened to me and most of my contemporaries.

St. Helier Boys School was run by the States of Jersey as nothing more than a dumping-ground where they could place all the teachers who were too incompetent, drunk, abusive, insane, violent, perverted, lazy, obnoxious, stupid and generally completely unemployable to hold down a job in even the other crappy States secondary schools.

The school could easily have been transposed to the grimmest UK inner-city areas – and, if anything, it would have been worse than a sink-estate comprehensive.

I simply had to get out of it – and left at the age of 15 – with precisely zero qualifications.

But – alas – unlike you (you’re not female, by any chance are you?) no establishment figure, such as Birt, has ever – in any way - shape - or form – tried to assist me.

On the - well-evidenced contrary – Phil Bailhache, Michael Birt, Bill Bailhache – all of them – have repeatedly striven to crush, obstruct and destroy me – untiringly and unceasingly – from the very instant I entered the political landscape.

I have no doubt whatsoever that Birt will continue to do that very thing.

Stuart.

Anonymous said...

Those who rubbish or mock the protest as useless or ineffectual should ask themselves one question. When was the last time the Bailiff (or any member of Jersey's government) was jeered at a public ceremony?

It has never happened in living memory.

Yesterday's protest was clearly the small beginning of a big change.

Un des nerds said...

A MASS-MURDERER IN THE JERSEY HOSPITAL.

Ashburton said...

Were the allegations against Anthony Marolia referred to the Nursing & Midwifery Council (the registration and disciplinary organisation for those professions) or to the Royal College of Nursing (which - in spite of its grandiose title) is the nurses' trade union?

Anonymous said...

"It's good to see positive action has finally arrived in Jersey.

Now maybe the fancy dress club will start to realise this is 2006, not 1806."

Do try to keep up! :-)) Today's date is 10 July 2009.

Anonymous said...

Syvret debate put off :

"For legal reasons a motion of censure against Senator Stuart Syvret has been put off until September.

Privileges and Procedures - who are responsible for the smooth running of the States - were bringing the motion against the Senator because of e-mails he sent to the Attorney General and the Constable of Grouville. In the e-mail to the AG - William Bailhache - Senator Syvret described his as 'a liar, a crook, and a closet fascist'. Senator Syvret posted the e-mail after he was arrested for a motoring offence. It's claimed he hadn't update the details on his licence.

The debate was supposed to take place on Monday.

But, earlier this week Senator Syvret was arrested and charged with breaking the date protection law because he'd published a confidential police report on his blog.

P and P chairman Juliette Gallichan has now written to all States members saying because of the pending court cases it would be impossible to hold an open debate without a risk of prejudicing the case against Senator Syvret.

The censure motion will now take place on September 8th.

Anonymous said...

Friday, July 10, 2009
DRUNKEN AND DISTURBED CHILDREN; THE FAILURE OF GOVERNMENT, POLICE, MEDIA AND PARENTS

http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2009/07/drunken-and-disturbed-children-failure.html

insanerator said...

This latest aerial photo of the reclamation site / dump shows that they're running out of space. What's next for Jersey when it's full?

Anonymous said...

"Can anyone point me in the direction of any proof (ie JEP article or similar) that the Dean forbade the clergy to support cild abuse victims and did nothing to stop the abusing could. I assume you mean Bob Key by the Dean?"

Of course not, because it never happened. Bob ADVISED the clergy to make sure that the victims gave evidence to the police before attempting any counselling so that the defence could not accuse them of 'false memories' induced by the clergy's support. He has no authority to 'forbid' and, given the rotten state of Jersey justice the advice seems eminently sensible. Like all other evidence, testimony needs to be uncontaminated. Shame on you Stuart for such gross misrepresentation (and I am one of your vocal supporters, not having a job to lose).

Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Bob Key has been universaly dreadful throughout this entire episode.

Only recently, he made a frankly disgraceful political speech in the States in which he supported those senior managers who caused the death of a paitient - whilst conviniently forgetting to declare an interest in that he is friends with at least one of the culpable individuals.

He also delivered a political speech - very thinly disguised as a sermon - to the massed ranks of the oligarchy after Birt's swearing-in.

Naturally - it was rabidly pro-oligarchy - and condemnatory of the protesting survivors.

He came - and went - and didn't come and say a single word to the people who have had their lives wrecked.

The more I see and hear supposed christians in action - the more I embrace rational thought instead.

Stuart

Dam Buster said...

Data Protection

Emma Martins

Bailanche

SOJ Gov and Employees

More to follow and I will let the people make up their minds on who has been breaking Laws? Who has sought to control the Law and who has been covering up!

Web Guru said...

Jersey senator charged with data offences

Tom Perry said...

When challenged with the massed rank of the Jersey band the answer is portable air horn/s with spare gas cannisters. We have football to than for this noisy and powerful supporters / demonstrators tool. Whistles are excellent as you demonstrated, also a good quality rattle can be a silencing device in tight built up streets. But portable horns are de rigeur for the serious protester. They will put the Jersey band on the backfoot! Check them out here just to get an idea of cost. Four of these these deployed and the boys in feather hats might be a little hard of hearing after the ceremony. The band will have given up! No one will be able to suggest you were unnoticed or unheard! And the horns can be tooted together with the word "justice" yelled by all at the end! Just a few ideas from someone who loathes anything that represents authority.

Anonymous said...

More Rob Duhamel madness:

http://www.ouest-france.fr/actu/actu_BN_-Un-projet-de-tunnel-pour-relier-Jersey-a-la-Manche-_8618-1000741_actu.Htm

Anonymous said...

Oh Dam Buster you are such a tease.
Show us what you have.

uruisg said...

Colm O'Gorman was abused by an Irish Catholic Priest. His campaign to obtain justice through the courts has contributed to cultural change in Ireland and stronger child protection policies. The culture of cover-up, denial and obstruction within the Catholic Church that he had to fight was eerily similar to that of the Jersey establishment, even down to the institutionlaised valuing of money above people. But we can draw strength from the O'Gorman story because of what his determined campaign ultimately achieved. He proved a match for the vested interests of the Church, just as Stuart will surely lead the ultimate triumph over the Jersey oligarchy.

Read about O'Gorman's book Beyond Belief if you want, but reading the book would be better!

Good Cause said...

May I ask your blog readers to take a look at a great new Jersey charities fundraising idea, please?
http://goanddonate.com/ will raise money for very little effort on your part and will cost you nothing.

Just use the site on your way to other websites that you're going to buy from, and the charity site will receive rewards for the "click-throughs". No scam. Thanks

Anonymous said...

Wont they say that these powerful supporters/demonstators tools are against THEIR Law?!

Anonymous said...

See the VILE RAG is at it again - not possible to leave comments on the swearing-in and protest.

Can't accuse them of being inconsistent though!

Anonymous said...

"Read about O'Gorman's book Beyond Belief if you want, but reading the book would be better!"

Since when has Stuart permitted commercial advertising on his blog?

Hawking commercial goods makes a mockery of other people's suffering.

Anonymous said...

Its good to see that the protest was the rags front page news, it was also nice to see that Ben Querre didnt make a big deal out of Stuart's presence.

Jill Gracia said...

"Of course not, because it never happened. Bob ADVISED the clergy to make sure that the victims gave evidence to the police before attempting any counselling so that the defence could not accuse them of 'false memories' induced by the clergy's support. He has no authority to 'forbid' and, given the rotten state of Jersey justice the advice seems eminently sensible".

In my experience if someone in authority 'advises' those under them not to do something, it is usually to be interpreted as 'don't do it'.

Regardless, it would appear that any evidence given will be as useless as a chocolate tea-pot as cases are dropped with no explanation as to why.

And I agree with Stuart. The Dean made no attempt to speak with the survivors at the protest yesterday, or attend the march last Saturday.

For a 'man of the cloth' it does not sit very well at all for those who may have appreciated some words of comfort. Poor show when even the Church is embroiled in politics.

Linky-dink said...

Police Chief 'a scapegoat'

St Helier Constable Simon Crowcroft will be asking the Home Affairs Minister about the cost and duration of the suspension of Graham Power, Jersey's Chief of Police.

Mr Power was suspended from his post after an inquiry was launched into the police's handling of the Haute de la Garenne investigation.

Simon Crowcroft believes Mr Power was made a scapegoat in the investigation and that his suspension is wasting taxpayers' money.

Anonymous said...

With the court case coming up, what's the betting the they get you to remove articles and hold in you contept of court if you don't.

Might be an idea to change the owenership of the blog to a trusted third-party off island should this happen.

Good luck and "don't let the Bar***** get you down" as one infamous politician said.

Dam Buster said...

Once upon a time!

There was once a person employed by the SOJ to do a very important job, as Emergencey planning Officer EPO for the Island. The person was employed for many many years dating back to the mid 1990s.

This person while employed by the SOJ was also working in a private capacity for a company registered on the Island to take advantage of the tax concessions. He carried out this private work on the SOJ time using the SOJ equipment etc. Naughty boy! This appeared to be an acceptable role to all as the SOJ either knew about it and turned a blind eye or else the person actively concealed the fact from the SOJ?

This person then sets about using all the SOJ equipment and an official email address which had been allocated to him by the SOJ to conduct his private work!

It is admitted that this person was responsible for thousands of employees in his private job. The only email address he had was the official SOJ one, as he had none for the private company [ very strange!] as he also claims to have worked for the private company for the same time period as hes employed by the SOJ.

I can go and say a lot more but this should give you an idea of what I will be talking about over the next couple of comments that I make.

The EPO at the time was a Ian Dulake.

The next eposide I will move forward to the Data Protection Commissioner and her findings! Your AG Bailanche and his efforts! and also a couple of civil servants Pollard [Mrs] and Mr Crich. There our others as well but to be continued!

Oh no they might think they know who I am now???????

DIM LE COCK said...

STEPHANIE NICOLE

Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Bombs Away!

Those damms are doomed!

The fatal fracturing has begun!

Go on Damm Buster!

Stuart

Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Publicising the memoirs of an abuse survivor - or, frankly, any other person who has written about the truth - is to be welcomed as far as I'm concerned.

Good luck to them.

The more detailed, personal truths get put out there - the greater we advance the cause of child welfare and protection.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

What did happen to Stephanie Nicolle - ive been away a few years ..............

Anonymous said...

Ian Crich was States of Jersey Human Resourses Chief Executive, he was taking near on £125,000 per year, he was the most ineffectual, useless baffoon imageable....
How the f### did he survive in that position for so long, without getting kicked out.... Hes gone now without a trace, so he thinks. HR are in a lot of S###!?

Anonymous said...

Why didnt 2nd in commard, Mrs Pollard get Mr Criches job when he left early, and without a trace?

Anonymous said...

I've just Googled Ian Dulake .... it makes very interesting reading indeed!

Anonymous said...

From The Times September 25, 2008
Caldicott: Forty years on, the schoolboys confront abuse




Tom Perry,has often contributed on this blog
I do wish people that constantly question why has it taken these so called victims of abuse so long to speak out watch the Bafta award winning documentary CHOSEN

Anonymous said...

CHOSEN

Anonymous said...

I believe it was Barnes Wallis who designed the Dam Buster Bomb -

Since I do not live in Jersey am I to understand that cracks are appearing and the flood gates will open.

If so I hope it the water floods before Stuarts court appearance.

If so bring it on.

Anonymous said...

I agree about Tom Perrys film about child abuse. It's a real emotional and factual insight into abuse and I think all the States Members should be made to watch it. I think they should also be lectured by some expert on the subject. Then after seeing and learing, I would like them to have an open ballot about whether they want to continue this silly game of coverup or to reverse their direction and to do what most people consider to be the right thing.. i.e give the victims justice so that they can move forward in their lives. Tom's film shows just why and how long victims are prepared to keep so quiet.
Tom and co- thank you for sharing your very painful ordeal. Lets hope the film can make a postive difference.

Anonymous said...

If people are too scared to protest for fear of being spotted, why not attend wearing a balaclava? If you dont have one, wear a pair of tights over your head. I'd expect numbers would quickly rise if people had their faces covered.
It would also highlight the fact that people in Jersey live in fear of loosing their jobs and planning applications.opr

Anonymous said...

You are not the only one embracing 'rational thought' Stuart when it comes to do-gooding christians. Fine, whatever faith people want to believe in, let them get on with it, but when they, and particularly the holier than thou men of the cloth themselves are such two-faced, ar++ licking, roll in their own clover but show no (real) compassion to the next man, Creeps it is ultimate pass the sick bag stuff. Anyway our Dean must get the award for the most free lunches going award.... for what?? Being a Dean? being Christian? Being in the House? He gets on every damn guest list for every SOJ invitees dignitaries dinner and how much does THAT cost over the years, like the past 50 years. It's ancient history cr@p we need to get well rid of.

Anonymous said...

Watch the film 'Chosen' - Free Online Here

Jill Gracia said...

C'mon Dam Buster - Chapter Two please!

It's the weekend and I've finished my library books.

Do you think your cover will be 'busted'?!

Anonymous said...

Next time we could wear masks made of printouts of a photo of the AG :)

Bouncing Bomb said...

Anonymous said...
"I've just Googled Ian Dulake .... it makes very interesting reading indeed!"

Doesn't it just. Jersey based Manager of a worldwide security operation but no longer using a SOJ email I note. Tell us more Dam Buster!!!

Dam Buster said...

Part 2 To follow

Jill they will know who I am! at least they will think that. I dont care as its all the truth and can be backed with solid evidence. Maybe I might breach the Data protection Laws! Ha hopefully they come after me it would be very colourful in court!

What I will be talking about is only the tip of the iceberg and is most likely common practice on the Island.

However theres huge implications to all of this. The big picture I cant discuss Stuart knows why!

I will be writing more later.

Anonymous said...

ArmorGroup

1420 Spring Hill Rd.
Ste. 300
McLean, VA 22102
USA
Telephone: (703) 356-0002
Fax: (703) 356-0559
Email: agnainfo@armorgroup.com

Key Personnel
Christopher Beese, MBE, Chief Amin. Officer
Matthew Brabin, CFO
Sir Malcolm Rifkind KCMG, QC, Non-Exec. Chrm.
David Seaton, CEO
Noel Philp, COO

Malcom Rifkind?


ArmorGroup Services (Jersey) Limited
18-20 Dumaresq St.
St. Helier
Jersey, Channel Islands, JE2 3RL UNITED KINGDOM
Telephone: +44 (0) 1534 873872

Anonymous said...

Here's the text of today's front page JEP story


Sex register
‘is top priority’

TWENTY-FIVE high-risk sex
offenders who require close
monitoring are currently unsupervised
in the Island.
Home Affairs Minister Ian Le
Marquand has revealed the number
of high-risk offenders currently
living unsupervised in the
Island – and has claimed that
there are up to 250 people in
Jersey who should be on a sex
offenders’ register.
Asked at a Scrutiny hearing
this week when a register would
be\ established in Jersey, the former
Magistrate insisted that the
matter was his top priority and
that he was keen to take something
to the States in the next few
months.
It is estimated that 250 potential
paedophiles should be on the list
and that 25 of them are high-risk
offenders. Currently, offenders can be monitored
only if they agree that the police can
watch them.
At the Education and Home Affairs Scrutiny
hearing on Wednesday the minister also
revealed that the total cost of running the
register could be close to £500,000 a year.
He said: ‘We have financing issues. We
have some money but not enough for a full
year in 2010. We have enough for about
seven or eight months. The ongoing costs
will be in excess of £400,000 a year. It will
cost more than that if you start counting in
the costs of the courts and law officers
bringing applications to the courts in the
short-term catching-up process.’
Under Mr Le Marquand’s proposal the
register would be styled on the UK multiagency
public protection arrangement system
involving officers from police, probation
and the courts working together under
one co-ordinator.
The proposed move would enable the police
to keep a check on those who have been
convicted of sex crimes. It would also be retrospective,
so that even if a person has been
found guilty before the law comes into force,
he or she could still be monitored. It would
also give Island officers the authority to access
information about, and keep an eye on,
sex offenders from outside the Island.
There have been 32 drafts of the complex
piece of legislation and Senator Le Marquand
has already reviewed three versions
as minister.
Reasonable grounds
‘The trickiest area is dealing with people
who do not have a criminal record but may
have done things which create a situation
where there are reasonable grounds where
they represent a risk,’ he said. ‘Ian Huntley,
the Soham murderer, had no criminal
record but there were strong reasons to suspect
him.
‘There will not be a criminal test, rather a
civil test – in other words “more likely than
not”.
‘The need to safeguard children is paramount.
The damage that can be done to children
as a result of sexual abuse is profound
and long-lasting. We have certainly realised
in recent years, as a result of the historical
abuse inquiry and issues that have come out
in individuals, just how severe the emotional
and psychological damage can be.
‘I am keen to get it in place. It is vitally important
to protect young people from paedophiles.
The sad reality is that there is no
cure for people with propensities towards
paedophilia. They can, with counselling,
learn to keep away from temptation but
temptation still remains, so you have to have
systems in place for monitoring people.
‘There is a danger of depriving people
who have done things in the past. If you deprive
them of a normal life they might be
more tempted to do what they did in the
first place. They need to have a life, but the
public need to be safeguarded, too.’

Anonymous said...

Didn't Ian Dulake resign from his post and wasn't welcomed by Walker??

A part of HISTORY said...

Jersey history being made

Anonymous said...

Who is Steve Ray? Letter in today's paper attacking Stuart?

Anonymous said...

From todays JEP.

Home Affairs Minister Ian Le Marquand said:

"The need to safeguard children is paramount.
The damage that can be done to children
as a result of sexual abuse is profound
and long-lasting. We have certainly realised
in recent years, as a result of the historical
abuse inquiry and issues that have come out
in individuals, just how severe the emotional
and psychological damage can be".

So,basically,hes acknowledging that there was child abuse at HDLG isnt he?.

Strike one for the truth.

Anonymous said...

Could some nerd set up a facebook page in support of the peoples protest in Jersey and set up a link here?
Maybe then we could gauge the amount of public support that the protestors have - people may be more inclined to show support via facebook than being labelled by attending a public rally?

Anonymous said...

What truth is there to the rumour going round that Dave Minty is under investigation by the metropolitan police for, get this, data protection breaches?

red rover said...

Piggy Minty for the chop! Corruption? He is very friendly with the ag.

Anonymous said...

No doubt the bullying at the sojp will be blamed on Harper and Power.

Anonymous said...

This weeks protest will go down in Jersey history. Bravo to the brave individuals that took part.

Grim reaper said...

Hi Stuart have you been granted legal aid for the data protection case?

Anonymous said...

It was interesting to read in the JEP about a Senior Police Officer who is on full pay suspension being involved in a sexual assault last Year! Shocking!

They appeared to forget to mention his wife- a Police Sgt is also suspended for the same offence. Also on full pay!
I assume they have been served disciplinary charges by now! They should be dismissed! To think that they were in a position of trust with SOJP!!

Proud Survivor said...

I have just watched "Chosen" on line. Thankyou for your bravery Tom, Mark and Alasdair - three truly rmarkable survivors. I feel honoured that we have Tom's support on this blog.

We need more films like this so people can understand how children feel about their abuse and the people that abuse them. I can also understand first-hand why it takes people so long to speak out.

Subscribe to this film and get everyone you know to watch it. I found it emotionally exhausting to watch and I challenge anyone to be unmoved by it

Thank you!

Dam Buster said...

Part 2

Realising that something just wasnt quite right, so began the process of investigating further.

First port of call was the Data Commissioner. The initial findings found nothing wrong and No Breaches had been committed?

This was appealed and brought before Martins the Commissioner. She also stated that no offences had been committed and indeed went on to criticise the UK Data Commissoners office for their findings and efforts! The vast amount of experience and expertise etc of the UK Commissioner being lesser than that of the 2 Jersey staff?
I will not bore you with the findings of the office as thats minor in the scale of things.

Having exhausted all avenues the next process was to complain to the CMO [ which was the required procedure]who was then Frank Walker. All that was requested was a simple apology from the SOJ for the actions of one of its employees. Guess what Mr Walker done??

Ignored the complaint and done nothing!!

Next step? Well there was a little bit of contact with a certain Deputy and that came to a very sudden end when It was mentioned that the matter may be pursued outside of the Island. This did not go down to well and the Deputy broke of contact. He did however supply some useful information.

The Deputy did however bring the matter to the attention of

The Attorney General

The Islands Foreign Dept [ cant remember his name?]

Remember dont forget about the Data Protection Act and possible breaches along with criminal offences!

Remember
The SOJ either knew about Dulakes actions found them acceptable and failed to act?

They knew nothing of his actions over a 12-14yr span?

Dulake concealed the fact of what he was doing over the many years?

I forgot to add in that there was also a former convicted terrorist employed and under Dulakes control!!

Thats all for now folks! To be continued

The Thinker said...

People could indeed support more over Facebook than a public rally. If you wish I could make a page - but is this the support that everyone needs?

Names on a page?

It's a good idea but maybe a more personal support might be a better option; such as a political discussion group of sorts?
It's a good idea for people who don't want to be involved in protest for reasons such as job security , but it's a better way of showing personal support to the survivors - it's more than just a collection of names.

However my contribution ends there (other than be willing to turn up). It might take a while to organise, but if we can find a venue then hey presto!

Feedback anyone?

Ryan M

Dam Buster said...

I know folks that what I am going on about is insignificant compared to the Child abuse and related matters and rightly so!

What I am trying to do is show another angle to the flawed system that Jersey operates under and expose right doings where and when I find them and have evidence to support.

Part 3 to follow

Anonymous said...

You should be careful about jumping to conclusions about the senior police officer suspended for the "sexual assault." The evidence is flimsy, almost non existent, there are going to be no charges, Warcup, who has treated him terribly, (the officer concerned was a strong supporter of the Historic Abuse enquiry) has said he will face discipline charges when he can think what they should be. It stinks. As I have said, the officer was no friend of Warcup and at least some of his treatment may have something to do with his attitude towards the HDLG enquiry.

Anonymous said...

I agree that the film 'Chosen',is a brilliant insight into child abuse and clearly articulates why people who have suffered are reluctant to come out with it, or at least for a very long time. I urge everyone to see it.

Anonymous said...

So a sex offenders register is TOP PRIORITY eh and Ian le Marquand says he should be able to take SOMETHING to the states in the next few months (I dont think we can hold our breath for this year).
My point is if this piece of legislation had some benefit for the finance industry it would be rushed through in 2 or 3 weeks just like a new law was back 10 years or so ago, something that you Stuart objected to and was given grief about. Maybe you could refresh my memory. Syd

Anonymous said...

"People could indeed support more over Facebook than a public rally. If you wish I could make a page - but is this the support that everyone needs?

Names on a page?

It's a good idea but maybe a more personal support might be a better option; such as a political discussion group of sorts?
It's a good idea for people who don't want to be involved in protest for reasons such as job security , but it's a better way of showing personal support to the survivors - it's more than just a collection of names."

Set up a small internet forum through conforums or proboards. Completely free and simply to use.

People can then discuss matters as a unified community.

Anonymous said...

Stuart, as a fellow student of irony and without a religious bone in my body, ever , I love the Tom Waits rendition of Gavin Bryars , Sinking the Titanic ,work entitled..

Jesus' blood never failed me ...yet!

Anonymous said...

To The Thinker

I think its high time that a political discussion group formed and did what they could to support this cause. If you get one set up, you can count on me to join and contribute regularly and enthusiastically.

Anonymous said...

"It is estimated that 250 potential
paedophiles should be on the list
and that 25 of them are high-risk
offenders. Currently, offenders can be monitored only if they agree that the police can watch them."

Exactly why would someone at high risk of re-offending agree to be monitored if planning to get away with more crimes?

There is obviously someone terribly important being protected, still, or this would have been addressed years ago.

And, what is the test of a true "highest priority" if not how quickly it is implemented?

That it has been left to Stuart and his blog to protect the public - this belatedly - from known paedophiles, murderers and child abusers, is solid evidence the judicial and budgetary priorities are kept deliberately out of line with public protection.

Remember, the oligarchy has already made clear there is not adequate funding and manpower in place for monitoring these sex offenders. There is only emough funding for political persecution.

Yes, there have been resources found for a SWAT team to arreat, search and detain Stuart, and for ridiculous suspension pay outs for a police chief, so what is wrong with this picture?

It is ironic that Jersey is connected to one seventh of the world's financial wealth, and invests so heavily in protecting an image, it is in danger of being seen as a sex offender sanctuary with third world political oppression.

If the oligarchy read the news, blogs and comments from outside Jersey, they will know there is no defense of them by anyone else. None. That suggests they are suspiciously willing to bring international disgrace to the island before allowing transparency related to sex offenders. Why?

Anonymous said...

On my way home, bel royal area there was a car crush just one car which looked like it had hit the wall, on my way past beaumont, guess who was on his way to the scene? nothing changes still corrupt as ever, but a nice party fpr the boys in blue!

Anonymous said...

Well done to everyone who had the guts to turn up to the protest.

And shame on every member of the states who refuses to acknowledge what is going on.

In the years to come do you think the people who decided that "least said soonest mended" will be remembered? Or the will it be the brave souls who stood up and said "this is wrong!"

The people who protested outside the States building were trying to cure this island and the people inside are the disease.

Anonymous said...

"Can anyone point me in the direction of any proof (ie JEP article or similar) that the Dean forbade the clergy to support cild abuse victims "


Can anyone provide me with any proof that the dean did anything to support child abuse victims?
A speech, a letter, anything at all?
Because, you know, as a supposed spiritual mentor to the island his words might have helped some people.
Maybe he's shy and doesn't like to speak in public.
Or maybe he's waiting for a sign from on high.
Or maybe he justs likes the comfy life he lives and doesn't want to cause himself any problems. You know just like Jesus taught.

Anonymous said...

What is the matter with you people?

Don't you see the connection?

Every politician who challenges the "jersey way" is obviously a criminal or a headcase, usually both.

Geoff Southern, Shona Pitman, Ted Vibert and obviously the evil Stuart Syvret.
It can't be a coincidence that every politican with the even the slightest of left wing views is out to destroy us.

So from now on I suggest that any politician who seems to care about people more than the Jersey finance brand be arrested immediately to save us all a lot of time and pretence in the future.

If Montfort Tadier doesn't become business friendly quickly he'll be next.( word to the wise Monty, whenever you are tempted by the dark side sneak a quick peek at Tel le Main. He's your ghost of Christmas future.)

Anonymous said...

Friday, 10 July 2009 23:58:00 o'clock BST

Anonymous said...
I agree about Tom Perrys film about child abuse. It's a real emotional and factual insight into abuse and I think all the States Members should be made to watch it. I think they should also be lectured by some expert on the subject. T




Its not our states members that need to watch this documentary
Its our judiciary , how many were educated at boarding school?
Probably all of them .
Bailache ,Birt they were all educated together .
They are all friends from childhood
No more to be said.

Anonymous said...

Deputy Power - hmm is making a big thing out of Seagulls, how dare they steal from the BBQs deposit their faeces over the washing, when the same states member has failed to support the right of Justice and condones the Establishment et al from dropping faeces from a great height on the abused and stealing their self esteem. One law for one - one for another.

Such a shame that those silly red hats with a seagull or the like perched on the top are held in high esteem by the obligarhy yet when the real live birds, who have the same rights as humans are regarded as a pesky nuisance. Just like the abused, paraded and rediculed.

Incidently next protest adorn stupid red hats perhaps to make a point.

Anonymous said...

"If Montfort Tadier doesn't become business friendly quickly he'll be next.( word to the wise Monty, whenever you are tempted by the dark side sneak a quick peek at Tel le Main. He's your ghost of Christmas future.)"

If Montford Tadier does "go native" it'll likely signal the end of his political career. He was voted into power by a majority who chose him as a chance for change, an alternative to the old ways.

If he stands at the next election having shown establishment colours he will probably lose the bulk of his original support, and it's doubtful he would have developed enough devoted establishment support to keep him in his seat - those voters using their votes for established establishment candidates.

Anonymous said...

Dam Buster - A government is like a pyramid, blocks surrounding an inner sanctum, once the blocks start to become dislodged it is easier to remove them and gain entry into the secrets held within.

Just make sure you do not dislodge the top one before it caves in on the sanctum otherwise the walls will collapse in and we shall never know is covered up in the rubble.

Keep chipping away, make sure you have a safety harness, we would hate any harm to come to you whilst your carrying out the demolition.

Anonymous said...

Just realised that you block any comments that you don't agree with.

That's pretty pathetic.

Senator Stuart Syvret said...

I do, actually, publish a substantial amount of critical comment - and it's there to be seen if you'd care to read the archive.

Certainly a good deal more critical comment appears here than you will find being accepted and published by any of the main-stream media against them.

There are loads of critical comment postings on this blog.

But I do filter out certain comments - for clear reasons I've explained many times previously.

For example - gratuitous insults, comments with obscenities in them, etc. etc.

I also don't publish threads which are obviously carefully calculated to simply be a load of time-wasting trolling.

Let's face it - there are plenty of media outlets out there - all the main-stream media in Jersey - and several web-based sites - that seem to have as a part of their 'mission statement' 'attack, misrepresent and denigrate Syvret'.

I've had nearly 20 years of hostility, slander and oppression from Jersey's main-stream media - so, you know, if you actually think rationally about it - it's hardly surprising that I'm not going to allow a load of trolls and Jersey oligarchy spin-doctors take over and sabotage my site.

Those who wish to be critical of me have a wealth of other media at their disposal already.

Stuart

Advocatus Diaboli said...

Hmmm, one of the most powerful weapons in the known universe - the phrase "We're still here!"

Ahimsa said...

I listened to a program on tv today half heartedly, can't remember the channel which remarked that the basis of Christianity was love, as in Faith, Hope and Charity, you know the platonic type of Love.

I especially took note of the Christian ethics of Love Thy Neighbour, Love Your Enemies.

One of my first social experiences of being nurtured and brought up by loving but very poor parents in Jersey was how the hugely rich, Christian family next door treated us with disdain to the point of bullying. I grew up with the notion that Christians were nothing special and what was special was that which was in the heart and that trust had to be earned.

This brings me to the subject of the very way in which Senator Syvret has been treated by many so-called Christians over the years that he has been actively engaged in helping the abused. Where was the Christian ethic of Love Thy Neighbour, Love Thy Enemy. Surely if the Government would have wished to change the course of his actions they should have welcomed his concerns, discussed them and used every method at their disposal by debate to even try to understand his concerns and deal with them.

The very fact that Government pompously thought that they were above such questioning and chose not to follow these ethics is the very reason why things have reached such an impass. One action after another, using whatever rule, law or tenet to denigrate and dishonour thine enemy.

We are not so blind!

Truth Will Out

From the experience I mention above I have come to the conclusion that far worse deeds were done in the name of Christian beliefs.

Samantha said...

We have been told this week there are 25 unmonitored "high risk" sex offendors on the island, so it can now be said that in Jersey you're never more than 1 and a half miles away from an unmonitored high risk sex offendor.

Likewise, we have been told told there are 250 people on the island who should be on a sex offendors register. So it could be said that in Jersey there are 5 unmonitored sex offendors per mile.

Unfortunately reality decrees this sex offendor population isn't evenly divided across our 45 square miles of land mass.

What worries and frightens me now is how many of those 250 live in the most densely populated area, the place with the most parks and schools, St. Helier. The bulk, I would presume. So maybe in St. Helier you're never less than one or two streets away from an unmonitored sex offendor?

How on earth did our government allow this situation to develop completely unchecked???

I would be interested to hear answers from the longer serving members of the States. What the hell have we been paying you for all these years? This is an outrage.

Anonymous said...

"I would be interested to hear answers from the longer serving members of the States. What the hell have we been paying you for all these years?"

Whatever it was we deserve a refund.

But now that it has been officially admitted that we have hundreds of unmonitored known sex offenders living on the island something will have to be done. Because if one of these known dangers to society re-offends the state can also be charged/sued for not dealing with an identified threat to the community.

Anonymous said...

If Montford Tadier does "go native" it'll likely signal the end of his political career.

Thats for sure.
We voted him in to change things not to join in.
He made a big deal about going head to head against some of the intellects in the states when he was elected but seems to be very quiet now he's got the job.
It's a nice clubhouse isn't it Monty?

I'll give Shona Pitman and Geoff Southern their due they at least speak up and challenge the establishment.

Anonymous said...

For sure. Both Pitts and Southern lead the way. Monty has let everybody down. I won't be voting for him again.
He's realised it's more cushy to be a Tel rather than a Stu and it's less work too.
He's a slip streamer.

Maria said...

"Anonymous said...

Just realised that you block any comments that you don't agree with.

That's pretty pathetic."

Try your luck over at planet jersey.

Ask Adrian Walsh why there has been nearly two months of silence from him since he announced data protection and the police would prove the safety of planet jersey and the member's personal data "over the next week".

See if that gets deleted. I dare you.

Anonymous said...

Who says Montford will go native?
Why would he want to?
He will make his name staying the way he is.... Single minded.

Proud Survivor said...

Just out of interest I wonder if there is an up to date "at risk" register of children on the island.

Please tell me there is a proper Child Protecton system in Jersey. We known there is still no sex offenders register but are CRB checks carried out on those who work with children and vulnerable adults? If not, how the flop is any child supposed to be kept safe.

I grew up in the days when we lived in fear of the Beast of Jersey. We also knew who the local paedophiles were but we were unaware that our island was a Mecca for wealthy, well-connected paedophiles too.

Paisnel is long dead but sadly, over 40 years on it would appear nothing much else has changed.

Póló said...

Surely talk of a sex register for Jersey is rubbish in the current situation.

The register will contain only the names of those convicted.

If the States won't prosecute ... !

TonyTheProf said...

On those criticising Montfort: Just because Montfort didn't join the whistleblowing protest in the Royal Square does not mean he has "gone native". There are different ways and means of engaging a in politics of protest, and while some like the tub thumping loud confrontational (but peaceful approach), others prefer quieter protest marches. If you really think he has gone quiet, I suggest you read what he has said in the States Chamber which is often very critical, with very good arguments. Read what he has said first - then make your mind up. Don't just fling mud around without evidence, like the boy who cried wolf. There's too much npn-evidential prejudice in the world as it is.

TonyTheProf said...

Regarding the Dean, I would also be interested in any directives forbidding the clergy to support child abuse victims. Again, some solid evidence would be useful. Some of us are empiricists, even if we are not paid up members of the Richard Dawkins, and we like to see that troublesome but annoying stuff called "evidence".

Anonymous said...

Just wondering here –
Remembering what Ian Le Marquand said on the BBC Radio Jersey talkback programme on Sunday, about the reasons for not attempting to prosecute alleged offenders connected with the historical abuse allegations, such as there being little hope of obtaining a conviction unless there was a 60 percent likelihood of success and that 10 out of 12 jury members would need to agree to a guilty verdict, I was wondering if there might be another un-stated reason for the reluctance to continue with these prosecutions.
Despite the number of witnesses, and perhaps the seemingly overwhelming weight of evidence, is it just possible that MONEY is also a serious consideration ?
In particular, when attempting to prosecute anyone who is reasonably well-healed financially, are they fearful of having to fight a vigorous defence from an expensive and possibly extremely formidable legal team ? Hypothetically, if a person who was currently in a position of power, was being prosecuted, it is probable the cost of mounting such a prosecution against a well-funded defence is something the SoJ might prefer to avoid, along with the other obvious scandalous implications of alleged offences by a senior civil servant who may still be in office and the resultant damage to the establishment.
As far as I can tell, this hypothesis has not yet been aired in this forum, and whilst I fully support Stuart’s struggle, I’m curious if at the end of the day, the real opponent here could be MONEY.
I wouldn’t be the first time the SoJ have backed down when faced with an overwhelming and costly legal battle. Remember the Les Pas Holdings debacle ?

Anonymous said...

Monty lacks depth, his arguements lack fact and he quotes too many poets and authors..I think he assumes that he has to have a say on everything..........its early days though - so I haven't written him off!

Tracy Vallois on the other hand speaks not for the sake of it, and when she does speak it is usually constructive.

Mike Higgins has been a breath of fresh air, he is articulate and well reasoned in his arguement.

Jeremy Macon pipes up now and again, and gives the impression that he has actually researched his topic - he is a bit school debating society!

That said it doesn't make a bit of difference as we all know that The Council of Ministers and the 12 Constables vote en bloc and rule the roost.............

Anonymous said...

Stuart

Those of us who are not in Jersey need to know how we may provide more active support for your cause.
Throughout the world there are volunteers who will speak up for the survivors of child abuse. There are also some who will rally to the cause of free speech in the face of political oppression. Off island, no one will side with the bullies. Help us better help you and those who need a wider voice. Do you have a network or organization we can contact?

- Just another ordinary American activist

Anonymous said...

Monty is a nice guy. However, there was no way he was going to be in the Royal Square. He's a backroom guy and will never serve on the front line.

Anonymous said...

Stuart,

do your readers know of the Portsmouth County Council peadophile connection with Jersey?

http://po12bg.co.uk/geden.aspx

John Torode said...

Stuart, you really are cooking up a stink!!

Anonymous said...

Are Pennies Dropping?

This from JEP Web Page (!)
Sex register ‘is top priority’July 11, 2009 – 3:00 pm
TWENTY-FIVE high-risk sex offenders who require close monitoring are currently unsupervised in the Island.

Anonymous said...

The Peasant's Revolt

Remember History Jersey
The Hero of the Revolt, Watt Tyler, went to parley with the King (who was effectively beaten) but got killed for his trouble and nothing much changed.

Anonymous said...

This is a lot like Robin Hood: men in tights.
The casting would be interesting!!
Robin = Stuart
Little John = Monty
Sherriff = Mario Birt

Zoompad said...

Important: This report is rather long but it should be read by all

Portsmouth residents who care about their city and hate paedophiles.



The story of Detective Inspector John Geden, Mike Hancock and PCC





1







In 2006 Les Cummings and 19 others report abuse they were exposed to as children in the care of PCC. DI John Geden was an investigation officer for Portsmouth Police. 2007 Les and Ralph Mitchell set up The Children’s Cottage Homes Justice Project and do battle with PCC through our solicitor and public demonstrations.





2







In the early days PCC basically laughed at Les Cummings (spokesperson) as he attempts to make representations in PCC council chamber on behalf of all the other victims. Les is treated with disrespect and disregard in his quest for justice.





3







Because councillors have no biographical information on the PCC website we challenge councillors to place bio information on the website. Not one did (If you look on the PCC website you will see some have at last placed their bio info on the site) so we then decided to investigate all councillors and discovered there is one serving councillor Mike Hancock who is a paedophile and two ex-Lord Mayors are also paedophiles. We also discover two councillors who were discharged from public service. So we are certain some councillors are hiding from their pasts. Cllr Vernon-Jackson for example and his less than honest dealings whilst a Mayor for Newbury, plus the lies he’s told since he’s been a councillor in Portsmouth. We are given much information about certain councillors by a 'civic minded' local resident and also travel the country to investigate these councillors who refused to give background information about themselves.

Ahimsa said...

The Peasant's Revolt

[Quote:]Remember History Jersey
The Hero of the Revolt, Watt Tyler, went to parley with the King (who was effectively beaten) but got killed for his trouble and nothing much changed.

Monday, 13 July 2009 09:26:00 o'clock BST [END QUOTE]

These days the peasants have a new weapon via the chattering masses across borders: THE INTERNET.

Truth Will Out

Anonymous said...

When is Tadier going to come out and say what he really knows about HDLG. He used to come up to work with his mum while employed there. He was there is the day time he mixed with the children there. When is Tadier going to have is say

Tom Perry said...

Home Affairs Minister Ian Le Marquand is belatedly promulgating a sex offender’s register and suggests that 250 people should be on it and that 25 of them are "high risk."

These are interesting statistics.

In England with an Est. population (2008) of 60,043,000 we have 33,000on the Sex Offenders Register. Jersey it seems, with a population of 91,533 (2008) has (est.) 250 paedophiles who would populate a similar register.

To clarify the meaning of the Ministers statement - Jersey has 5 times more sex offenders who qualify for registration than England.

The prevalence of sex offenders in both countries is:

England: 1 in 1819 people
Jersey: 1 in 366 people


Has the Minister revealed Jersey's secret?

Anonymous said...

I have "bumbaked" as the verification word.
Is this from Tom Brown's schooldays or HDG?

Anonymous said...

Tom, seems a bit on the low side to me. This only takes account of the convicted offenders. If you don't prosecute you don't get any convictions.
(Good work!)

Jill Gracia said...

Good old JEP, predictable as ever. Won't allow comments to be left on the letter from Steve Ray?? knocking Stuart being involved in the protest at Thursday's swearing-in. Every other letter can be commented on, so may one ask why not this one?!

I will not waste my time writing one in to them, as it goes without saying it will not be published, so I would just like to respond to you Mr Ray assuming you read this blog.

Why, please let us know was this an embarrassment to the Island? In my book people are elected to work for the good of the people, and this is what Senator Syvret does. He is not afraid to stand up and be counted, and I think you are wrong inasmuch as I do not think he despises the States, but the judicial system and the Establishment, as indeed do a lot of people.

Indeed, I personally saw people who were not local to Jersey approaching Senator Syvret and commending him on his actions, and who seemed to have an awareness of what was wrong in the Island.

Why you feel a States member should not demonstrate is beyond me. Did you make any attempt to engage with any of the protestors and glean an insight into what they were protesting about? I guess not as you said you just passed through.

And why on earth should he resign?
For bringing issues into the open that would otherwise be sitting amongst that great pile of Birt (oops sorry - dirt!)under that very grubby carpet?

I think not.

Anonymous said...

Tom your quite right, the secret has been revealed however, "Jersey is Peopdophile Capital of the Western World." It has been confirmed by Le Marquand home affairs Minister and "he should know".

Not sure if they asked Jim to Fix it for them, they wanted to be famous for something, so now we know.

Just a pity they have not confirmed how many people have been sexual abused and have NOT received Justice.
That will be some sort of a record also.

Anonymous said...

Contacting a few high profile (or any) hotels or other tourist trade businesses enquiring, do you do staff CRB checks before booking? may prick a few consciences perhaps.
With so may perv's about I am not bringing my child to Jersey (or any C.I.)

Anonymous said...

Senator

I’ve noticed your repeated use of the term “well evidenced”, and putting the tactic of saying something often enough that people end up believing it aside, what is this evidence? I’m no legal expert but I do know that if all the evidence available is that of statements from victims (no matter how compelling) then all you have is one person’s word against another. This is not even close to enough to obtain proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Exactly what evidence is there apart from the statements of the victims themselves, which can be easily dismissed by any defence lawyer?

Anonymous said...

If money (or the lack of prosecutorial balls) is an additional factor in failing to administer justice on Jersey, then no one can be suprised if extra judicial means are employed to mete out the law of the jungle on those who might be in line for a "tug". It will be like the Wild West unless action is taken urgently. Twenty plus years have passed with lawyers sitting on their hands - it will all start to unravel unless proper action is taken. NOW!

Anonymous said...

It's interesting what you say about Tadier. Why has he kept so quiet about his mum working there? Why is he keeping a low profile now it's out??
Adding to this that he was up there himself mixing with the kids.
Why on earth has he made no mention of this on his blog.
I am literally astounded.

Shelby said...

"Jersey has 5 times more sex offenders who qualify for registration than England.

The prevalence of sex offenders in both countries is:

England: 1 in 1819 people
Jersey: 1 in 366 people"

So it's official, Jersey is the paedoph-isle.

One has to ask how this grubby little problem reached such gargantuan proportions unseen. How much is down to the "don't rock the boat" mentality rife in certain political circles?

Tom Perry said...

Another troubling statistic which I take from the website of "Stop it Now" a charity I know well and which is part of the Lucy Faithfull Foundation, is that 1 in 6 children in England are affected by sexual abuse before they are 16 years old. It is in the first line of the link page provided.

About 18 months ago someone who is involved in detailed academic research related to child sexual abuse and the activities of paedophiles informed me that the highest residency of paedophiles in England is located in East Sussex. I have no reason to doubt the veracity of this information, and highly respect the individual who told me this. Assuming it is correct, and bearing in mind that paedophiles target opportunity rich environments, what it is that East Sussex might have in common with Jersey to explain the seemingly high number of resident perpetrators indicated by Jersey's Home Affairs Minister?

Answers on a seaside postcard please.

This has been a rash of posts for me which will unlikely happen again. They are about issues which are at the centre of my exchanges with the DCSF and others.

Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Yes - a great deal of the abuse is extremely well-evidenced.

Some of that evidence has been published on this blog over the last 18 months.

For example - I have a link to the Sharp report. I suggest you read that to begin with.

But in a substantial number of the abuse cases, we're not merely speaking of the word of one person against another - instead we are dealing with multiple complaints made against the same perpetrators - complaints often made be people who don't know each other - so there is no question of witness contamination.

With historic abuse cases, by there very nature, it is the weight of 'evidence of similar kind' - of corroboration - which secures convictions.

And I sure as hell know there is enough such evidence in a sufficient number of cases to mount credible prosecutions.

For sure - guilt or innocence would be a matter for the court to determine.

But enough evidence for many prosecutions to be mounted?

Without question.

It is also very important to remember we are not only dealing with HDLG - there were many other examples of abuse - at many other States of Jersey run institutions.

And - it is also important to remember that the crimes we are confronted with are not confined only to the acts of abuse themselves.

I would say one of the powerfully defining characteristics of the Jersey Child Abuse Disaster are the sheer quantity of examples of perversions of the course of justice - and of conspiracies to pervert the course of justice.

The cover-up is the standard, entrenched reaction of the jersey authorities.

So yes - for a very substantial number of these crimes - there is indeed very significant evidence.

Perhaps next week sometime I'll describe again much of that evidence.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Leaving aside the fact that the decision has been taken to discontinue the investigation, on the account given above it would seem to suggest that one way forward would be to charge on a conspiricy to comit lewd acts (lawyer speak, it sounds comical if it wasn't so serious) this allows many defendants to be tried together and avoid serious applications (by which I mean applications that might stand a chance of succeeding) to spilt trials. You really want all the perpetrators in one Court at one time. A jury (is it a jury trial in Jersey?) is less likely to acquit if it hears all the evidence at one time against several defendants.
How many defendants would there be do you think? The charges depend on what is disclosed in the witness statements, but I will bet that common assault is a good starting point!

Anonymous said...

"In my experience if someone in authority 'advises' those under them not to do something, it is usually to be interpreted as 'don't do it'."

Then you obviously have no idea how the Church of England functions. This is emphatically NOT the Church of Rome. Incumbents have absolute security of tenure. Bob may advise, incumbents are quite at liberty to disagree.

Anonymous said...

Stuart, I feel a bit concerned that Monford Tadiers mothers employment at HDLG has been subject of some remarks. I am more than sure that NOT EVERYONE who was employed at HDLG was responsible for child abuse.

Unless there are substantiated evidence I feel that this remark is going down the wrong road.

Having said that I am pleased to see that it has been confirmed that Jersey is the peodofile captial of the Western World. It is such a great shame that the Establishment et al have brought this shame upon the good people of Jersey. Had they conducted themselves correctly Le Marquand need not have made this statement.

It is also encouraging that facts are arising now that you can actually say "I told you so" but no-one listened and I am not referring to abuse on this occasion, however I am sure in the months and years ahead I am sure the same conclusions will be made and once again the people of Jersey will say "Syvret spoke the truth, why did we not listen"!!!!!

Anonymous said...

With case's that have now been deemed closed by the AG, for any of those brave enough to go public, would it not be possible for someone to write a book on those cases, naming names etc... !!!

Dam Buster said...

Part 3

I will try and condense things for ease of reading?

1. States employee moonlighting / double jobing on SOJ time and using their equipment and resources.

2. Walker remains silent.

3. Jane Pollard SOJ HR changes her tact several times and confirms that she could not find any evidence of Dulake having declared his post with the private comapany. She also claims that the Laptop which was SOJ property was destroyed [by the SOJ] after Dulakes sudden departure. This also changed from a sudden resignation to a planned retirement?

4. A local Deputy confirms that he has recieved several complaints from different sources at least 3 or more of a similar nature relating to the same SOJ employee.

5. Ian Crich makes an email response which is rather sloppy! and alludes that others where effected as well.[ He then gets the boot or replaced shortly after sending this email?]

6.AG BAILHACHE decides that no offences have been committed and no criminal investigation is warranted. Also go to the police if you want but I will be advising that no criminal offence appears to have been committed. Theres nothing fit for investigation.

7. The new head of SOJ HR on directions from the CMO Closes the complaint.

8. All that was asked for was a simple apology from the SOJ.

At the very least what we have is systamitic failings by the SOJ or an aceptable level of arogance that they can do what they want! Maybe they our even party to whats going on? The financial industry of the Island must be upheld at what ever costs.

So was there any of the following being committed and by whom?

Fraud
Deception
Breach of Data Protection
Breach of Computer Misuse laws
Tax avoidance [ Both local and Intl] etc etc etc ?

Of course not! Does this point to a cover up by the SOJ?

Was this a rogue element in the SOJ or was it part of normal procedure and common practice?


Who am I to complain? I am a minow in the scale of things but for the smart arses who read this in authority they will be well aware of the consequences of all this as they our far reaching very far reaching.

To those who need to, keep looking over your shoulder start shredding if you want, its already too late.

You have been caught in the rat trap!

Time to let others do their duty!!

Anonymous said...

Who do you go to if Emma Martins fails in her job? Can you refer a complaint to the UK then?

Anonymous said...

Detective Inspector John Geden of Hampshire Constabulary responded: "I will be conducting a review of material from the previous investigation, and ensure that any material appropriate will be forwarded to the investigation team in Jersey."

Did this info go through bill & ben's hands first?

Anonymous said...

FIGHTING CORRUPTION IN PORTSMOUTH CITY COUNCIL

Anonymous said...

Mr Nobody

Anonymous said...

I am also wondering why this Tadier bombshell has generated no comment. If there was physical abuse taking place at HDLEG, surely Tadiers mother was aware of it? I guess she shut her mouth and took the cash. I'm not saying Tadier would have been aware of it, but why has he duped us, by not revealing this bombshell??
If this is all true, i feel that he cannot be trusted.

Anonymous said...

Is a private prosecution a posibility? Do you need AG approval before laying a complaint (chellengable if refused)?
Do you want to organise a private subscription fighting fund?
Is there a Jersey lawyer with sufficient courage to take this on?
I bet there will be some London Briefs who will do it pro bono (free)

Anonymous said...

Re sex offender living in jersey

statistacly only about 30% of crime is ever reported or investigated. This being the case, what is the true number of peadophiles living within our community?

Much higher than that stated me thinks?

Proud Survivor said...

Anonymous said:

"If there was physical abuse taking place at HDLEG, surely Tadiers mother was aware of it? I guess she shut her mouth and took the cash."

There is no "if" about it. Physical, sexual and emotional abuse was taking place in HDLG over at least a 40 year period but it did not happen to every child and it did not involve every member of staff. As in Tom Perry's school there were children who were "chosen" and many will have remained silent for a number of year's because of fear, guilt or repression of feelings that they did not understand. Many were probably unaware that it was happening to other children too. Some spoke out and were not heard or believed and nothing was done. Some were classified as disturbed because of what they disclosed and sent for psychiatric "help"

As for the staff, it may be that Mrs Tadier like a lot of staff was unaware of what went on, mostly after lights out. There were decent, kind and genuine people working there who would have been deliberately kept in the dark. Many employees were very young and gullible and it was easy to hide things from them. If anyone did speak out as revealed in the Panorama programme, no action was taken and in the case of one young house parent, threats were made against him and his family if he spoke out again.

Nothing is to be gained by pointing the finger at people who may not have been aware of abuse at HDLG or elsewhere. The guilty ones know who they are and they cannot be shielded for ever.

Anonymous said...

Stuart,

Why these gratuitous attacks on Montfort Tadier? Is it because he is on PPC and they are bringing the vote of censure?

If Monty did not wake up in time to attend the demonstration it was because of your hostility; it was not through a lack of sympathy for child abuse. Recall he was an organizer of the T4C Rally on 8th March at which you spoke. The JDA members did not attend the protest either, albeit to their credit they did not go to the Cosy Club’s outing to the Royal Court.

Anonymous said...

Is there the will to proceed with private prosecution?

I can see Syvret-v-R (Ex Parte The Attorney General & St Helier Magistrates) on the horizon after the impending case.
Charge inadequately specified, from the AG? How can this be? Is the man a fool?
Do set the charges out for us, it's not a secret and the CPS or whoever must know about it already.

Senator Stuart Syvret said...

I can't speak for others criticising Montfort Tadier.

But I'm asked is my criticism of him - to the effect that he has "gone native" - based on his support for the PPC oppression against me?

The answer is yes.

How the hell can any new States member - who markets themselves as a modern, non-oligarchy, progressive - cheerfully support the customary abuse of supposed disciplinary powers by the majority grouping in the States in order to oppress minority members?

It isn't that I criticise him - or those other two - supposed - progressives - Judy Martin and Mike Higgins who also went along with the PPC oppression of me - for disagreeing with my actions.

They are entitled to their opinions.

But if we cannot look to people like these supposed non-oligarchy members to at least insist on the observation of the rudiments of due process, then God help us.

PPC insist on the following:

Always holding such hearings in secret - thus denying the exercising of their "justice" in public.

They refuse to obtain relevant evidence and to properly research complaints.

They refuse to adopt a credible methodology in conducting such hearings. For example - rather than using an adversarial or inquisitorial means of determining the facts - basically, they invite the complainant and the complainee in to have a bit of a chat.

They persist in allowing members of PPC who are clearly personally conflicted to remain involved in determining complaints, such as the one against me.

I could go on - and on.

The point is - even if Tadier, Higgins and Martin did, in fact, remain convinced that me sending an e-mail to the Constable of Grouville - which he then chose to publish - merits condemnation - we really should still expect from people such as these three that they would, at least, insist on a credible methodology and process.

But they haven't - and they wont.

As I said - "gone native".,

Stuart

Anonymous said...

PPC proceedure? From another age (long gone averywhere else - except Zimabwe perhaps oh! and North Korea and Iran)

Anonymous said...

Dam Buster,

I bet Bill Ogley was scratching his head when he was asked to destroy Dulake's laptop....
That was a biggish project for him.

Anonymous said...

So the old chesnut of a bridge or tunnel connection to France is being bandied about again. Seeing there are no elections on the horizon one can only assume it is a smoke screen for some more bad news that our elected leaders are trying to bury!!

Anonymous said...

Bridge /tunnel?
Beware the dreaded pfi.
It will be a smokescreen to lose/hide (make on the side) another few millions either way.
(I am so cynical)

Anonymous said...

It seems to me (Prince Cahrles voice) that PPC proceedure breaches
basic rules of fairness.
(Here see repeated Cambridge Uni. review of Employment Tribunal rules):

Natural justice
The definition of natural justice used in the Acas Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievance says that a person against whom allegations are made should have:

advance notice of the allegations and evidence
the opportunity to challenge allegations and evidence before decisions are reached
the right of appeal against any decision taken

Sound familiar? Thought not.

Zoompad said...

Richard Wise was my lawyer, and he was trying to help me and other people who had been abused as children by the Pindown system to get justice.

He died very suddenly, apparently of liver cancer, in 2002. It's strange, because he seemed ok to me, until right before his death.

Anyway, this is the obituary the local press gave him:

"A leading human rights lawyer, who lived and worked in Stoke-on-Trent, has died.
Richard Wise, who was 45, became known in the 1980s for securing the release of hundreds of people imprisoned for not paying their poll tax. Three years ago he was named Human Rights Lawyer of the Year. In recent months he helped set up a Children's Rights Centre, to help youngsters deal with the long-term effects of abuse and other traumas. "

Richard helped thousands of people, who had been sent to prison on really trivial charges. Many of those people had been abused as children.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/if-he-cant-spring-you-nobody-can-1347699.html

He also stood against Mark Fisher MP in the local elections.

Mark Fisher tried to decieve me in a sweries of letters (I have them still) by pretending to know nothing about Pindown and the secret family courts, when I begged him to help me - he was actually on a TV documentary about it when Allan Levy did the Pindown report which exposed the horrible scandal. I felt a real idiot about being decieved so easily, and very very angry as well.

Stuart, I'm continuing to pray for you, because these awful people are so ruthless, they have done all this before, and they are NOT going to get away with it this time.

Anonymous said...

What has Tim Tindall done?

Anonymous said...

Has anyone else had trouble getting onto any local blogs, in the last half hour, (5 to 5.30pm)?

Anonymous said...

Politician charged over DPA offences

Anonymous said...

Tim Tindall isn't he a centenier from St Lawrence who failed to become constable?

Anonymous said...

great day for jersey

Anonymous said...

Sorry to say it, but there seems to be no appetite for a private prosecution of the 11 (and any more against whom there is evidence).
I can well understand why survivors can't invest time and tears in a case which might not succeed.
I think you would have had the financial backing though. I hope that helps in some way. You have a great many well wishers. You are not alone.

Anonymous said...

i applaud senator syvret for his ambition and courage on behalf of the jersey people... But,
i dont think im the only one who feels that these protests are not having the desired effect to make REAL CHANGE.
in jersey we currently have a boiling pot of injusice on nearly every social level of the lower and middle class.
there are people in prison and care homes who neva received anything near a fair trial or a trial at all. 'ellected' officials are not there to help but to confuse the public, along with its paid puppets who have the final say at 'the rag'.
which is why i write today to ask all of you like minded people out there, to stand together, under a word that covers all aspects of justice and dignity, from young to old, from rich to poor. EQUALITY. you may not have been abused in a care home over here, but you may have had an officer of the law step on your human rights, you may not have been locked in a bathroom sized cage for weeks on end, but you may have sufferd at the hands of a broken social security or housing department.
ma point is this, we only have strength in numbers, our individual arguments no matter how big or small, should be brought together under that word wich will serve each and every one of us better than any other, EQUALITY.
and remember, 'wether you are in the mojarity of a thousand or the minority of one, the truth is still the truth'. [ghandi]

Dam Buster said...

Re
"If Emma Martins fails in her job"

The next step is to complain to the CMO! For what thats worth but it appears that the AG also takes these matters under his wings! and would appear to have the final say.

Without going into all the nuts and bolts of things, there has been a chink in the armour and through this it opens the doors to the Aladdins cave. We all know that there is very little chance of any real justice being administered in Jersey, you have had lots of experience of it!

They have rubbed people up the wrong way who our from outside the Island. So we must call on the services of those experts from outside to look a little bit closer at things. Hopefully it will be like a deck of cards, once one falls the rest will follow. The upper echelons our rotten, as you well know.

If I can help some one as I pass this way!!!

Anonymous said...

How come Monty hasn't spoken up about his mother?

Anonymous said...

forget the protests, its time to make real change with 'non' compliance.
if you are unhappy with the way things are being brushed under the white collar carpet and forgotten about, then we must hit them where it hurts?
each and every reader of this blog has the independant duty to fight for democracy, so on a date of your choosing as a collective, we will each write a letter to jack straw and the houses of parliment,
stating that we do not recognise this self ellected goverment as a democracy, but a socialist party. protect freedom of speech like you protect your freedom of choice my friends. you might be able to deal with things now, but imagine the world your children will be living in when they remove such freedoms? i for one won't stand by while they dismantle a democracy our grandfathers and fathers died for during the first and second world war, nor will i look my children in the eyes in ten or twenty years and have no reply when asked, what i was doing when a police state of corruption was being built around me..
guilt is not always watched through the eyes of a judge, it is also looked at through the eyes of people suffering injustice, at the people who did nothing

Anonymous said...

...forget the protest....
I'm in! Mike

Straw won't reply you know.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Has anyone else had trouble getting onto any local blogs, in the last half hour, (5 to 5.30pm)?


Yes thought my server was up the creek
I was looking at voiceforchildren at the time

Anonymous said...

Copy of an e mail sent to Dr Liam Fox (my MP)

Dear Dr Fox

You have, it seems to me, steadfastly sat on your hands for several months now, in spite of my attempts to rouse you into action.

You have failed dismally to even contact your Minister in opposition, Jack Straw, to register my (and many others) concerns about children in care at Haute De La Garren and many other sites on Jersey. I have no faith in you, your party or frankly Westminster.

This posting from, it seems to me a Jersey Islander, rather sums up the feeling of betrayal I feel in you personally. I hope you are happy with yourself.

........
forget the protests, its time to make real change with 'non' compliance.
if you are unhappy with the way things are being brushed under the white collar carpet and forgotten about, then we must hit them where it hurts?
each and every reader of this blog has the independant duty to fight for democracy, so on a date of your choosing as a collective, we will each write a letter to jack straw and the houses of parliment,
stating that we do not recognise this self ellected goverment as a democracy, but a socialist party. protect freedom of speech like you protect your freedom of choice my friends. you might be able to deal with things now, but imagine the world your children will be living in when they remove such freedoms? i for one won't stand by while they dismantle a democracy our grandfathers and fathers died for during the first and second world war, nor will i look my children in the eyes in ten or twenty years and have no reply when asked, what i was doing when a police state of corruption was being built around me..
guilt is not always watched through the eyes of a judge, it is also looked at through the eyes of people suffering injustice, at the people who did nothing
...........

Anonymous said...

Stuart is it tomorrow that you go to court,
if so good luck , got the link from Tom Perrry about the air horns
The inauguration of our Attorney General to the position of deputy Bailiff
will be noisy

Anonymous said...

Draft letter? (feel free to cut and paste and make amendments)

14th July 2009
Dear Mr Straw
Jersey Child Abuse Scandal
I have e mailed you {and unsuccessfully attempted to make representations to you via my MP Dr. Liam Fox to you} about this long running scandal, without any response.
I am afraid that I and many others believe that time is up for you, and demand immediate and decisive action from you to deal appropriately with the tide of human suffering which is on Jersey. There are a great many surviving adults who were brutally treated as children in the “care” of the Island Social Services Department and whose suffering is continuing by witnessing a total failure of justice by seeing many of the guilty continuing in their daily lives, and even prospering as well to do happily retired servants of the state content in the knowledge that those in power on Jersey have withdrawn police investigation and recently allowed eleven of most likely perpetrators. Cases on many others have been quietly filed away.
Evidence ( eg. skull fragment) has gone missing, children’s teeth found at one care home dismissed as the tooth fairy’s hiding place. One can only shudder at what fate befell the innocent children whose remains have never been found.
Such is the power of senior politicians that one can but conclude there is some wider conspiracy at work. Why have you seemingly taken no action whilst in office to properly investigate this issue, and why did your Conservative predecessor do like wise?
One wonders if there is a State sponsored agreement to keep quiet on the matter, as in Belgium, Ireland and Australia.
I am afraid that this issue will blow up in your face without some proper immediate action. I believe that the scandal on MP’s expenses will be as a pimple to you and colleagues if the scandal on this issue and you failure to act.
I hope to see some action very soon.
Yours sincerely

Anonymous said...

Do any of the computer experts out there know how to put together an online petition supporting this Jersey effort which can be accessed and signed by those from Australia, Canada, Mexico, USA, NZ, Europe, etc. I would support that, as would many others around the globe.

Senator Stuart Syvret said...

No, my court case starts Thursday.

Isn't it great?

Me - being prosecuted for making public interest disclosures.

And child abusers getting let-off by Bill Bailhache.

"life enriching" stupidity.

Stuart

One Day said...

Dam Buster, thank you for the advice re Emma Martins.

You see after lengthy email exchanges, I still have not received a reply to my last email, copied in below!


To: e.martins@gov.je
Subject: RE: Data Protection Complaint
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 14:03:45 +0100

Dear Emma Martins,

So basically you are telling me that any person who has a child involved with social services or the courts, that any lawyer can and will legally? (by any means possible - even miss-representing themselves), gain any information about such person (not the subject of any investigation) and use it in any way they wish.

Are the public aware of this fact?

Yours Faithfully,

Mrs ......
A member of the public who is not having their data protected.

Anonymous said...

here here Stuart, Le Marquand is suggesting that there are at least 250 peodophiles on the Island of Jersey who should be on an abuse register. When did these abusers go to court, or are they just known, uncharged peodophiles.

Ironic really, your being taken to court for disclosing information relating to a known criminal, yet peodophiles who have not gone through the criminal system will be placed on a register which the public will have the right to view under the freedom of information act. They will be naming names of people who have not been found guilty by a court of law. Whoops have the half wits considered this fully. Data Protection - defimation of character, not guilty until proved in a court of law!!!!

My considered opinion is that the AG et all have all taken leave of their senses. They do not have a clue relating to European Laws, for which they are required to comply under the UK treaty have with the EU.

It beggars belief that these idiots have the future of Jersey in their hands.

Taking you to court is perhaps the best way they can highlight how absolutely stupid they are, this will indeed be reported in the international media and I hope someone does take the time to point out Le Marquand's proposal. Happy to put peodophiles on a register but Jersey is determined not to charge anyone with offences against the abuse survivors, unless of course they are considered from the 'low life' dispensible and be used as a token gesture to compliance. The fact that one of these was himself subjected to abuse as a minor and committed abuse as a teenager against his peers. No-one condones what he did but why oh why have HIS abusers not been held accountable?

They most certainly are the biggest load of shysters and half wits of any Western Government but Stuart I have every confidence you will stand your corner, how you are supposed to get Justice god only knows, certainly not in the corrupt Jersey Judicial system = the UK Maybe - the EU definately.

Anonymous said...

Stuart,
It may be different with Jersey, but first return dates on the mainland (England anyway) are just for accepting pleas (e.g. Not Guilty) or perhaps legal submissions (ie the charge is crap in which case you will not be asked to plead).
If the legal submission is not accepted the case is adjourned to a trial date or listing pre trial review.
I am sure your brief will have told you, just letting everybody know what is likely to happen on Thursday.

Anonymous said...

Zoompad, by chance, I knew Richard Wise and he was a good bloke.
I didn't know he died. A sad loss.

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 315   Newer› Newest»