Wednesday, 16 February 2011

"HOW JERSEY WORKS": REVISITED

Speaking Truth to Power

Having to spend so much time battling the Jersey oligarchy's army of million pound lawyers has left me precious little time to write new articles. Instead - a detailed legal case has been gradually coming together beneath the battered keys of the lap-top. At present it's 110 pages (not including evidential documents, affidavits and cited cases) - but I'm reasonably confident it's going to make quite an exciting read for all that.

A small part of the research has involved the occasional trawl through the back-pages of this blog, and if I say so myself, many of the articles remain fresh and relevant.

I had cause to re-read the old article I reproduce below - and I found it so accurate it amuses me to re-produce it. Called "How Jersey Works" - it was written in response to a letter published in The Rag - and it remains a very useful guide to the true nature of power in Jersey - the last single-party state in Europe.

And the issues I address in the article - and the "culture" I describe - are not unrelated to the police-state oppression I'm attempting to resist.

So, although written some time ago, in response to a specific example of Jersey oligarchy log-rolling, it remains a depressingly accurate description and dissection of "The Jersey Way".

In the mean-time - put Monday 14th March in your diaries; that's when the court case starts.

Stuart.

Saturday, 29 March 2008
HOW JERSEY WORKS:
Decades of the Most Foul Child Abuse;

Nearly all of it hidden;

How did it Happen?

“The Jersey Way”:

“Measured”, “Respectable” and “civilised”.

I hope many of my readers will have been able to see the Inside Out programme which was broadcast by regional BBC television last night. It will be on their web site for a week or so I guess.

Could I also recommend that you try to see BBC Panorama, which will be broadcast this coming Monday. It focuses entirely upon the Jersey child abuse disaster.

If you have been following this crisis in the national or international media – you will be deeply puzzled as to how such monstrous abuse could have been concealed for so long? Why did every ‘check and balance’ in Jersey fail to protect these children?

Why did those in “authority” in Jersey permit this to happen?

To discover the answer to that question, check out a letter published in today’s Jersey Evening Post, Saturday 29th March.

I would post the web address – but The Rag, being so archaic, the letter isn’t on their web site yet.

The letter in question is written by one Philip ‘Pip’ Le Brocq. I do suggest you acquire a copy as it serves as yet further evidence of how intrinsically decadent, stupid and hypocritical the Jersey oligarchy is.

The letter is titled “Senator’s words discredit the island he claims to love.”

It is another assault upon me for speaking the truth – a commodity in profoundly short supply amongst the Jersey establishment – indeed, something they appear to have a nasty allergy to.

I suppose I should be grateful for Pip’s letter – it illustrates so perfectly the very points I make in trying to expose the debased and ignorant self-interest that grips Jersey’s elites like a cancer.

And there is, I should add, an additional advantage in that whilst he’s writing this cretinous and ethically bankrupt nonsense, he doesn’t have time to write the truly appalling ‘sonnets’ he is want to churn out – labouring under the delusion he is some kind of ‘poet’.

As many of the greats have said – the first requirement to write good poetry is a grasp of the truth – not something we see on display in Pip’s letter.

Just how dishonest and stupid is his missive?

Well, let’s have a quick stroll through its nether regions in our quest to understand the monstrous failings and abuses of power in Jersey.

The letter is an attempt to defend the Bailiff, Sir Philip Bailhache – chief judge - and Speaker of the island’s parliament.

Phil gave a political interview to The Rag a while back – which I wrote about in my post “A Last Desperate Throw of the Dice.”

Pip portrays Phil as some kind of towering beacon of wisdom and leadership – a mighty figure we ignorant and frightened proles can cling to in this time of storms.

Well – let us recap the actual - evidenced – “performance” of Phil Bailhache.

This is a man who was Chair of the Victoria College Board of Governors for much of the 1990s – when complaints of child abuse were being made. Complaints which were not reported to the police.

The same Sir Phil Bailhache, who – when I was facing a dismissal debate in the Jersey parliament for having honestly answered a question about child protection failures – prevented my official comments and supporting evidence from being published.

The self-same supposed judicial expert – who was content to allow the political ‘trial’ of me take place – with only the case for the ‘prosecution’ being published.

The same Phil Bailhache who failed to declare a ‘conflict of interest’ given that some of the evidence he was oppressing related directly to the child abuse at Victoria College – when he was Chairman of the Board of Governors.

The self-same Phil who condemns the international media coverage as “scurrilous” – it apparently not occurring to him that the UK media have reported – entirely accurately – such things as his anti-democratic and foul actions in preventing me giving a speech which was the first ever expression of recognition and empathy for the abuse survivors by a member of the States.

The same man who – by frightened and rabid dictat – recently had me thrown out of a members’ room in the island’s parliament building whilst I was in the middle of an interview with a French TV crew.

As I said in my other post – essentially an inadequate, ignorant and foolish little man.

A person utterly out of his depth and possessed of the “wisdom” of a Moss Side alcoholic.

But – I titled this post “How Jersey Works”.

I wanted to explain to you the breathtaking incompetence, decadence, self-interest, greed, megalomania, mutual protection and startling invulnerability of the Jersey oligarchy.

By understanding “How Jersey Works”, we gain some insight into how this island can have had within its midst’s – and under the very noses of its authorities – generations of the most foul concealed child abuse. Because, let’s face it, concealing generations of systemic and appalling child abuse is so clearly the “civilised”, “dignified”, “measured” and “statesman” like thing to do.

So – How Jersey Works:

You see – what Philip Le Brocq neglects to mention in his epistle is that he once was a teacher at Victoria College.

He somehow also forgot to mention that he is a personal friend of Phil Bailhache.

And - very forgetfully - he fails to inform readers that he is the husband of one Sally Le Brocq – formerly Sally Harrison – multi-millionaire scion of the family which owned the Guiton Group – parent company of Jersey’s only “newspaper” the Jersey Evening Post.

Remember the Guiton Group? Its boss and chair of the board was one Frank Harrison Walker – now Jersey’s Chief Minister. A man who attaches greater importance to defending senior civil servants than he does to child protection.

Pip also neglects to mention another fascinating example of How Jersey Works. He fails to tell us that his multi-millionaire wife, Sally Le Brocq, is one of the 12 ‘Jurats’ – lay-judges - of Jersey’s Royal Court.

Now – regular readers of this blog will remember – even if Pip doesn’t – the name of another of the 12 ‘Jurats’.

That being one ‘Jurat John Le Breton’ – the man who had to resign in disgrace as Vice-Principle of Victoria College for having failed to inform the Police Force of complaints of child abuse – and who even went so far as to attempt, with the Principle, Jack Hydes, to intimidate and humiliate two of the victims in to withdrawing their complaints.

So – there we have a quick lesson in How Jersey Works.

How its entrenched, nepotistic and incestuous power-claque ruthlessly work together at the merest hint of a threat to their lucrative grip on power in the island.

Pip moves towards a close by bemoaning the fact that I am returning to my “immature” days of an enfant terrible - rather than being “admirable” in “gaining the wisdom and dignity of an elder statesman.”

These fascinating assertions require a few questions.

And I really need answers to these questions, Pip, as - obviously - I am clearly so out of step with the “reasonable and polite” conduct of Jersey’s traditional establishment.

Admittedly, about 95% of the rest of the planet seem to share my views – but, of course, it is simply axiomatic that the Jersey Establishment is Never Wrong.

So most of the world, most of my readers, and I have clearly become profoundly confused; we’ve lost our way, Pip. And we need your guidance to regain touch with the truth.

So, tell me, Pip, I take it that your definition of “dignified” includes the terribly, terribly “respectable” “elder statesmen” who raped orphans in Haute de la Garrene?

Would that be the kind of “wisdom” and “dignity” displayed by “elder statesmen” who have repeatedly attached greater importance to the “image” of their oligarchy and the size of their bank accounts than they have to the battery and torture of vulnerable children?

Pip, would the “civilised and measured” behaviour of which you speak include the peddling of lies and oppressions against those trying to protect vulnerable children?

Do you, Pip, include in your definition of “civilised and respectable” behaviour, the unlawful preventing of the publication of evidence which demonstrated the truth of the Jersey child abuse disaster?

Pip, do you consider it “statesman” like to assault democracy and justice in this way, as your friend Phil did – whilst failing to declare a ‘conflict of interests’ – namely him being Chairman of the Board of Governors of Victoria College when that institution was concealing child abuse?

Do you mean the “civilised and measured” behaviour exhibited by Phil when unlawfully stopping me from making a speech in the island’s parliament in which I was attempting to express some empathy and compassion for the Jersey abuse victims?

Well, actually Pip, you needn’t bother replying – your answers to these questions must surely be “yes”. Why else would you have written such cretinous and despicable rubbish?

And, even though your answer is “yes” – well, I’m sorry – but I’m just going to have to carry on being - and choose your appellation according to your tastes – “reprobate scum”, “a communist”, a “McCarthyite”, an “anarchist” or – famously - someone who is “trying to shaft Jersey internationally.”

I’ve been called all these things – and worse – in the course of the last 12 months.

My “offence”? Trying to root out and stop the abuses of power that enabled child rape and battery to remain concealed for generations.

So – in fact, being opposed so totally and rabidly by people like you, Pip, your mate Phil and the rest of your Jersey oligarchy friends, actually makes me feel pretty good.

For if I was regarded by people like you and the rest of the Jersey crypto-fascist feudalists as “one of us” and a “respectable elder statesman” – I would develop a compulsive disorder which would require me to go and shower every 30 minutes in an effort to cleanse myself of the sensations of filth and rot.

Pip concludes his missive by likening me to the protagonist of ‘A Picture of Dorian Gray’ – destroying myself through self-delusion.

Let me invite readers of this blog to decide for themselves.

Given what we know about the child abuse disaster in Jersey, who, do you imagine, has been unceasing in their efforts over the years to maintain and project a healthy and desirable “image” to the world – whilst the decay, rot, festering canker and corruption boiled out of the picture hidden away in the attic?

Me – or Philip Le Brocq’s beloved Jersey establishment?

The answer is self-evident – so - as I said in a previous comment – give me honesty over “politeness” every single time.

Stuart Syvret.

180 comments:

Anonymous said...

Phillip Bailhache. This is a man who was Chair of the Victoria College Board of Governors for much of the 1990s – when complaints of child abuse were being made. Complaints which were not reported to the police.

Bloody hell it's all coming together now.

Anonymous said...

'You air in correspondence with Mr. Pip?' Having had a letter from you, I were able to say ... And so God bless you, dear old Pip, old chap, God bless you! ..


and Reg
and Pierre
and John A

You get the drift.......

Do you like Dickens?
Childish joke arises.

Anonymous said...

Great post Stuart, all of it in a nut shell, I like many thousands of 'ordinary' Islanders did not have the advantage? of a Vic College education (thank God) but I have over the years crossed paths with many who have (including the famous PIP)and the one singular thing that stood out more than any other is the HOLD this B....y States school (yes..regardless what may be said IT IS simply a states school, the parents simply pay fees that is the only difference)has over it's past inmates. The ones I persoanlly know of NEVER let a day go by without mentioning the place, snap off a finger (or any other appurtenance) and just like 'Blackpool Rock' the name Victoria College would be there for all to see, I consider myself to be a well balanced and well educated person, a person who has travelled extensively and seen what many describe as the 'Real World' and I will for ever be grateful that I never had to attend such a soul sapping, intrinsically sad place where the reputation of the 'school' is more important than the exposure of the sodomy of small children.

voiceforchildren said...

Stuart.

The whole lot of it stinks, and this is just a little taster from your main post as to what we are up against.

" whilst failing to declare a ‘conflict of interests’ – namely him being Chairman of the Board of Governors of Victoria College when that institution was concealing child abuse?"

It's just sickening and frightul.

Goosh! said...

these posts really are quite something else. The level of detailed research puts other local media to shame.

The fact this goes on in modern society is appalling.

There is a worse crime though......people in Jersey burying heads in the sands and pretending nothing is happening (so long as it doesnt affect me)

Apathy is no excuse. As the saying goes "If you arent part of the solution, you are part of the problem"

Anonymous said...

You say 'At present it's 110 pages (not including evidential documents, affidavits and cited cases) - but I'm reasonably confident it's going to make quite an exciting read for all that.'

Oh dear that made me laugh.

I'm sure the oligarchy ARE going to find it "quite an exciting read".

Though not exciting in the pleasurable sense.

Is the Nemesis approaching over the horizon?

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Is this nemesis?

If 'the rule of law' means anything in the British Isles - it certainly will be.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Anonymous #2. You would be surprised how many OV's there are around who never mention the place. A couple of posters on here I know for example. The noisy few who rely on the name are the empty vessels. They have no contents and nothing to offer. Those with skills and talent either quit the island or operate unseen and unheard.
By chance a related posting the club

Anonymous said...

I couldn't resist combining Supa.Commissioner Bowrons comments about policemen on bicycles and Flann O'Briens 'The Third Policeman' of which this is an extract.


'The narrator approaches the police barracks which looks false, as if it were painted like an advertisement on a hoarding on the roadside. Inside the barracks he meets two of the three policemen, Sergeant Pluck and Policeman MacCruiskeen, who speak largely in non-sequiturs and are obsessed with bicycles. The barracks contains various strange artefacts including a contraption that collects sound and converts it to light based on a theory regarding omnium, the fundamental energy of the universe. There is a vast underground chamber called ‘Eternity,’ where time stands still and mysterious numbers are noted and worried about by the policemen. There is a box from which anything you desire can be produced; and an intricate carved chest containing a series of identical but smaller chests.'


The task of your readers is to point out as many links to Jersey Police activities contained therein as possible.

The prize is not to mention that the closest thing to a policeman is his bicycle seat.

Anonymous said...

Does the Sharp report mention that Philip Bailhache knew anything about the abuse? As I understand it, the Headmaster and some of his fellow masters, largely took it upon themselves to deal with it internally, including NOT informing the governors.

In a similar way, if a Senator Syvret was in charge at the hospital, and was not fully informed by his managers, he can't be said to be culpable.

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

There is a link to the Sharp Report on the front of this blog - top of the links list.

Read the report and judge for yourself what the governors did or did not know.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

I sent my son to Victoria College. I regret that now because it was like sending him into a den of thieves. I expected him to get a good education, which he did but at a price.

I have more than one child and the other went to an 'ordinary' school. I allowed them to make their own decision as to which school they wished to attend once they passed their quallies.

I have no qualms with spending, what is after all the price of a decent new car, on giving what I thought was a decent education to my children.

The boy at college was always having to replace things because they got pinched in class, in the playground or in the changing rooms. It became quite expensive paying out for yet more rugby shirts. Nothing like that happened in the 'ordinary' school.


As an aside - I just put a simply worded review up on Waterstones in relation to the 'Treasure Islands: Tax Havens and the Men Who Stole the World'
by Nicholas Shaxson - It is a very good read if anyone is interested in purchasing the book.

You are doing a good job Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret and take comfort from knowing that you have some really good, honest supporters out there who are not scared of telling you if you are getting a bit stroppy sometimes. But they realise the potential outcome of what you are doing. Take heed - We are all behind you 100%.

Anonymous said...

Tunisia,Egypt,Bahrain,Iranthanks to internet its getting nearer !!!!

Anonymous said...

You are doing a good job Ex-'Senator Stuart Syvret and take comfort from knowing that you have some really good, honest supporters out there who are not scared of telling you if you are getting a bit stroppy sometimes. But they realise the potential outcome of what you are doing. Take heed - We are all behind you 100%.'

Nice simple and to the point.
I concur.
This Stuart, should be your banner statement

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

I'll never have another 'banner'.

I'm through with electoral politics.

I live in fear for my life now, as it is.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

I'm sure that even some of your more regular readers will think that the 'Jersey Way' is an exaggeration or overplay. This week I heard evidence that it's alive and well.

An institution that our Chief Minister is fully entwined with legally and morally is in severe trouble due to the effects of the COM cuts.
Consequently voluntary redundancy at terms that turn out to be half of the public sector in this area is being offered and compulsory redundancy is to follow for a modest number of staff.

The institution has employed an 'expert' to sweeten the bitter pill.

When asked 'How will people be chosen for Cumpulsory Redundancy?'

The answer was truly breathtaking.

1. Those with political peruasions not in tune with the institution.
2.Those with their own agenda.
3. Those who(This is verbatim due to its crassness) ' Don't walk the walk' .

A lawyer employed by the staff representation told the 'expert' that there were serious human rights involved and they should 'say no more'.

Some aspects of Jersey have a few centuries of 'best practice' to cover in a very short time.

Ian Evans said...

So you should be living in fear of your life Stuart.

The only way they can stop you destroying them, is to have you murdered, that will be their only chance of survival.

Anonymous said...

Ex Magistrate Christmas must have upset the "boys" or is the deal done already!! no comment box as usual online rag.
Ps what happened to the other potential magistrate Le Cornu all is quiet there.

Anonymous said...

sorry stuart, I meant your website banner.

Anonymous said...

'How Jersey Works'

If I may steal one of your favourite words Stuart :) How apposite is it that at this moment that magistrate Ian Christmas will be in the royal court tomorrow?

It's as if nobody knew it was going to happen and suddenly he's been summoned.

I'm guessing that agreements have already been reached and that there will be no prison sentence even if he is guilty, which of course is not proven at this time.

My point is though, don't the people of Jersey find it at all worrying that a Jersey magistrate should even be charged with fraud involving investors in properties in bloody Florida?

Another thought that has crossed my somewhat bemused mind is that I would love to know exactly when magistrate Christmas was charged and why it was kept a secret.

Zoompad said...

"The only way they can stop you destroying them, is to have you murdered, that will be their only chance of survival."

If any of them try it the Lord will strike them dead, plus those they send out to do the deed. You are not destined to be a martyr Stuart.

Anonymous said...

when magistrate Christmas was charged
Too long & has been paid also,if found guilty should be made to pay salary back as taxpayers money.

Anonymous said...

B.Ogley's going end of May.

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Give it a few years - Ogley is going to be in jail.

Along side a few of the other "untouchables".

I've always said of these people - that their sense of invulnerability was misplaced - given the manifest lawlessness of the position of their protectors.

Indeed - they may end up sharing a cell with a couple of Attorney Generals.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Ogley "resigns"

jep online comment (at least theres a box)
Is he not able to stand the pressure like Warcup then?

Anonymous said...

Well - I guess BO will now be the fall-guy for all the political cock-ups of the past few years. I'm not saying that he has not himself been a major player but this opportunity will not be lost to heap upon him all the blame for "misleading" the Council of Ministers and giving them bad advice etc.
The imminent Committee of Inquiry was probably the final straw.

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

The days of fall-guys - conveniently ready to be depicted as the scapegoat - silence brought with massive pay-off of public money and gold-plated pension - enabling the Jersey oligarchy to then bury the matter - are over.

Ogley is a criminal.

A very serious criminal.

But - for all that - no thinking person can fail to recognise the fact that - at the very core of every wicked, corrupt, criminal and disgraceful think that has unfolded in Jersey these last three or four years - sits one particular individual.

More criminal - and more disgraceful - than the rest.

That person is William Bailhache.

A man who perverted the Office of Attorney General into little more than a hick-town gangsters' 'enforcement unit'.

Hubris. In the end the Jersey oligarchy have bee brought down by hubris.

Just didn't know when to stop.

Thought they could get away with anything.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Tensegrity

and the next one supported on the now flailing wire is?

Clue 'Over my dead body!'

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Mario Bundy.

And glad to see the very, very highly apposite 'Tensegrity' analogue alive and well.

The wires and struts are now undergoing that accelerating cumulative failure.

Who do we think are the next 'members' to fail?

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Our comments on BO departure have not been printed yet....

Bill, you can run but you can't hide.

and my friends comment....

Good riddance to bad rubbish.

Anonymous said...

Who's next?

How about the law finally being brought to bear on a certain inadequate, women-threatening, cowardly worthless troll?

One with a history of cyber-stalking, and who's name appears Operation Ore?

Anonymous said...

You seem very confident Stuart. Just how scared should these oligarchs be?

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Scared.

Very scared.

The End is approaching.

Stuart

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

'Operation Ore' eh?

Ah - now there's a thing.

I'm glad Jersey does have some brave and decent police officers.

Stuart

voiceforchildren said...

Stuart.

Ogley Shredded

Zoompad said...

"Mr Ogley and his wife will be returning to the UK to be nearer their family."

Don't you think we have enough corrupt politicians of our own? If he comes to the UK, you Jersey islanders ought to take Jack Straw off our hands, at the very least!

Zoompad said...

"One with a history of cyber-stalking, and who's name appears Operation Ore? "

Please could yopu tell me who, as Operation Ore affects me, and I want to know all the people responsible for screwing my life up

Anonymous said...

One of the personalities is taking time out from blogging.

Zoompad said...

OH! OH!

You mean one of my persecutors?

Ian Evans said...

WILL HE BE BACK FOR HIS TRIAL?

Anonymous said...

But - for all that - no thinking person can fail to recognise the fact that - at the very core of every wicked, corrupt, criminal and disgraceful think that has unfolded in Jersey these last three or four years - sits one particular individual.

More criminal - and more disgraceful - than the rest.

That person is William Bailhache.



No need for anymore comments. This guy is the biggest criminal in Jersey

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Yep. There's certainly a very strong argument for coming to that conclusion.

Now - whilst I'm still working on my legal submission - would readers like to supply me with any further examples of the gross bias - essentially the corrupt political misuse - of the prosecution system in Jersey?

Examples where people, businesses or States departments should have been prosecuted - but were not - in contrast with anyone not on the side of the Jersey oligarchy, who has been so prosecuted?

I've already got the obvious ones down - Tel boy Le Main - Sean Power - Health & Social Services - etc.

Any other examples of stark double-standards on the part of what passes for a "prosecution" system in Jersey gratefully recived.

Stuart

Ian Evans said...

Stuart said

"Now - whilst I'm still working on my legal submission - would readers like to supply me with any further examples of the gross bias - essentially the corrupt political misuse - of the prosecution system in Jersey?"

I have a whole host of them! I am also working on another case at the minute which will floor you. I think the lady has already emailed you if I am not mistaken?

Anonymous said...

Outgoing Lt-Governor endorses legal system

General Ridge way says he has seen
"no signs of corruption"

Anonymous said...

People have always speculated about backhanders in the planning department.
Can anyone confirm that there is a specific, current case which is being kept very quiet?

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Oh dear - that's so funny.

"General Ridge way says he has seen
"no signs of corruption"

Yeah - course you ain't, Andrew.

Tell me - are you - like one of your predecessors - going to immediately take up a highly lucrative non-executive directorship with a major jersey firm - within days of leaving Office?

London's representative "sees no signs of corruption in Jersey".

God that's funny.

And surprisingly topical.

Be seeing you Court - Andy.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Can you tell us Stuart, why does Jersey always have an ex-military Lieutenant Governor, who just parties with the oligarchs, when the British Overseas Territories have a representative from London who will often be a civilian, and sent to the posting with the particular duty of ensuring the proper rule of law and reporting corruption back to London?

Why does Jersey get a Crown representative who's job appears to be to protect our corrupt establishment instead of enforcing good governance and the proper rule of law, like happened in the Turks & Cacaos Islands?

Anonymous said...

Am hearing that Rosemary Geller was pushed. Fact or fiction?

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Because Jersey is a sinecure. It is one of the few remaining "products" of The Crown - one of the very few places left where the "understanding" is that the British Crown will have a blind eye turned to its running of the place in the manner of an old "court" - in which the inherited oligarchs will dispense favour to their vassals and clients - or damnation to their enemies - in return for loyalty to the monarch who confers the favour and "privileges" granted.

The British Crown could possibly have maintained the situation too - in sleepy disregard - for decades more - had they not become so complacent - and allowed utter decadence and hubris to run riot in this place.

Now - a great deal of very, very messy legal truths are going to emerge.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Its all kicking off, I've not looked in for a few days a bit out of the loop you could say.

Clearly I need check in more frequently to find out who's in and whos out.

Ian Evans said...

REMEMBER THIS LITTLE GEM?

Anonymous said...

Ridgeway has his head stuck so far up the 'corporation sole' that he couldn't see corruption even if he was being showered in it ... (or something that rhymes with 'it')

Anonymous said...

Tell me - are you - like one of your predecessors - going to immediately take up a highly lucrative non-executive directorship with a major jersey firm - within days of leaving Office?

Please tell me that was a joke, Stuart it was, wasn't it?

Anonymous said...

'How Jersey Works'

Delusions of Grandeur

Heap Big Chief has decided that his changes to 0/10 are solution.

He did not wait for a decision from the EU Code of Conduct Group.

He did not wait until after the necessary law changes have been approved by the States of Jersey.

Does Chief Terry believe that every random thought that appears in his brain is the answer?

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

A reader says:

"Tell me - are you - like one of your predecessors - going to immediately take up a highly lucrative non-executive directorship with a major jersey firm - within days of leaving Office?

Please tell me that was a joke, Stuart it was, wasn't it?"

No - not at all.

Its a matter of public record.

Sir Michael Wilkes - literally within days of leaving Office, became a member of the board of the company that owned what was back then the Le Riches supermarket chain.

In fact - it was he who used that infamous phrase about the Jersey oligarchy having "Friends at Court at Whitehall".

Make no mistake about this.

For centuries the Jersey oligarchy have been assiduous in "capturing" the representative of the Crown - of the UK government - in Jersey.

Whoever they may be - they are "groomed" - wined and dined by the local crooks - and thus become a reliable "protector" of the local regime - rather than what they should be - a protector of the ordinary population against the excesses and corruptions of the local gangsters.

Perhaps Wilkes will get one of his SAS / MI6 hit-men to terminate me now?

The Office of Lieutenant Governor in Jersey is a failed Office.

It has - for generations - been suborned and co-opted by the Jersey oligarchy - with the result that our "Glorious Leaders" are able to act corruptly and lawlessly with impunity.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Much as I support your laudable aims to clean up Jersey, if this is right the urgent overwhelming, indeed vital task is to clean our emissions.
http://nickpalmer.blogspot.com/2011/02/were-ed.html

Anonymous said...

I see the super troll is back giving it loads on thisisjersey. 'Real Truthseeker' is our one and only farce blog clown. How does he find the time.

Anonymous said...

BBC Jersey Watch

Press Release News

The great thing for BBC Jersey about governments and organisations employing PR officers as standard now is that the news arrives in the newsroom already written. In these times of limited resources this frees up the journalists to do other things like… oh wait a minute.

Reproduced below is the Ogley story, which has been the lead on the BBC Jersey webpage since 14:09 yesterday, without any updates.

See how the journalist cleverly combines the two statements, “Mr Ogley said:”, “Jersey's Chief Minister Senator Terry Le Sueur said:”, “Mr Ogley said:” to make it look as though he/she had actually put in a call to them, with like, some questions? But don’t worry your licence fee is not funding such extravagance.

Never mind that neither of them “said” anything. They’re quotes from written statements. The journalist is not stupid! It can’t look like a press release, duh.

See also how the one phrase that might give rise to suspicion surrounding the circumstances of the ‘resignation’ - ‘agreed to a mutual termination of employment’ does not appear in the article. That would only fuel cynicism from those pesky conspiracy theorists that take up valuable airtime in our political phone-ins, when we had them, insisting the government doesn’t tell us the truth.

No the headline says it all. “Bill Ogley to quit”. End of. And how much this “mutual termination” is going to cost the taxpayer is frankly none of their business. BBC Jersey will not be used as some pawn in a fruitless game of pursuing authority for answers.

Here’s the article. I smell a Royal Television Society Award.

Jersey's senior civil servant Bill Ogley will leave his post in May after eight years in the island.
Mr Ogley came to Jersey in April 2003 as Chief Executive to the Policy and Resources Committee.
He was brought in to lead the changes needed for the move to ministerial government and then became chief executive to the Council of Ministers.
Mr Ogley said: "Being chief executive has been a privilege and I will be sad to leave Jersey."
Jersey's Chief Minister Senator Terry Le Sueur said: "After eight successful years Bill and I have agreed that now would be a good time for change at the top of the civil service.
"I thank him for a job well done and wish him all the best in his next new venture."
Mr Ogley said: "It is a wonderful island with a bright future. The States has a great workforce, with some very able people and one of my greatest joys has been to watch them grow and succeed.
"I believe eight years is a long time in a job as demanding as this one. I hope my departure will create an opportunity to review the senior structure and to bring new ideas and a fresh perspective.
"While leaving Jersey will be a wrench, I am looking forward to moving back to the UK to be closer to family and friends and to starting the next new and exciting chapter of my life."

Anonymous said...

"The culture of self-supporting invulnerability demonstated by senior officers is now going to come to an end whether they like it or not".

Stuart you said that to the Rag 3 years ago.

You also said that it would all start to take effect in about 3 years.

So its only just the beginning then?

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Three years - yes, that's about right.

Once my court applications are completed and submitted - for the directions hearing beginning on the 14th March - I'll publish them here.

Although - given the length of the main document - it will have to be in several 'chapters'.

The significance of it?

The significance is that the current "capture" of all what should be our checks and balances, by the Jersey oligarchy is going to be terminated by the action. Sure - maybe not until the final principles get to Strasbourg.

But one way or another "The Jersey Way" - the corruption and subordination of all meaningful power in the island - is coming to an end.

You remind us of what I said three years ago; that I was right is not the result of any great insight on my part - rather just a recognition of the very obvious - as contrasted with the blinding, crazed hubris of the Jersey oligarchy, gripped as they were by an wholly unrealistic sense of invulnerability, born of the fact they'd always won hitherto.

Their defeat is the "black swan" event - the thing they didn't think existed.

But - as I've remarked previously - when you have so lost all grasp of reality and common sense - that you start believing its a good idea to back corrupt and dangerous civil servants in engineering the dismissal of a Minister who is trying to protect children - when you are an organisation under very serious criminal investigation, and you "solve" that problem, simply by criminally suspending the Police Chief - and when you start to believe that police-state massed raids, arrests and searches without a search warrant, and Stalanistic show-trials against opposition politicians is a 'good idea' - all in the 21st century - then you are manufacturing your own demise.

The momentum of events cannot now be surprising.

Only an utter damn fool can ever have imagined the conduct of the Jersey oligarchy these last three years to be anything other than an act of corporate self-destruction.

It will make a great study in Groupthink for some scholar.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

So slowly and surely, step by step, "them" in senior (but not "top") positions are being removed. All nice and gentlemanly so as not to ruffle the feathers of those who have a financial interest in the Rock's stability.

And they think that by letting these people go that we will forget and let bygones be bygones. Aka States Chamber: "we are where we are".

Yeah right ...

The Beano is not the Rag

Anonymous said...

"And they think that by letting these people go that we will forget and let bygones be bygones."

Let them go, they wont go unpunished, the UK police will deal with them, but concentrate on what is really important, which is clearing out the rest of the gangsters ruining the beautiful island of Jersey. Get the house swept clean of all the dirt.

Zoompad said...

"NO, WE ARE NOT YOUR BROTHERS!"

http://zoompad.blogspot.com/2011/02/no-we-are-not-your-brothers.html

Anonymous said...

"Get the house swept clean of all the dirt"

or

"Get the house clean of all the BIRT"

Ahimsa said...

"Let them go, they wont go unpunished, the UK police will deal with them, but concentrate on what is really important, which is clearing out the rest of the gangsters ruining the beautiful island of Jersey. Get the house swept clean of all the dirt".


Yes for sure the minnions are going but it is the top dark tier that should be weeded out as well. The vampires that have been attacking the financially lucrative veins of our lovely little island for their own benefit.

Anonymous said...

This journalist wasn't sipping cocktails with the elite at Government House - CBS reporter Lara Logan assaulted in Egypt - "Jersey wageournalists" hang your heads in shame.

Anonymous said...

RE HEALTH CHIEF PAY

No wonder we are in trouble they can't even count,they got the figures wrong!!!!
£200k still too much though.

john said...

Ah good news about Mr Ogley,
Perhaps another MBE for servives to children

Anonymous said...

Thanks to Guernsey FUTU something else to make you smile :)

Coastal path found buried under mile-long stretch of dog shit

Anonymous said...

I think this thread title is the right one to pose the question:

Why is it deemed the right time to release the rest of the Wiltshire report redacted on 1st March?

Why are costs being promoted for the reason to curtail questions asked in the States, when one of the reasons is that TLS and ILM (being the worst) often do not answer the questions actually asked and many times elaborate on stuff not asked. If they elaborated more on what is asked, the number of questions would be reduced and less time would be spent by everyone concerned.

Anonymous said...

Royal Court sitting showed that Mr Christmas was due to be indicted on 13 fraud offences, but defence Advocate Robert MacRae protested that he had been given no evidence by the prosecution.

http://www.thisisjersey.com/2011/02/19/magistrate-fights-fraud-indictment/
-----------------------------
Is this actually happening in a Jersey court? especially to an employed Magistrate on trial ?

Even as a lay woman I am aware that both sides must have the same information for the trial to continue.

Why did the prosecution not pass over the evidence held against Mr Christmas to his defence council?

Jersey’s judiciary obviously make the rules up as it goes along.

Hell they might even stop the defence calling witnesses as they did in your trial. What is going on ?

Anoynmous

Anonymous said...

let us not forget Joe Kennedy the 'Berlusconi' of Le Chenes and Greenfields

Zoompad said...

"Jersey’s judiciary obviously make the rules up as it goes along."

OF COURSE THEY DO - PHIL SAID SO HIMSELF!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj2h_I-paLQ

Anonymous said...

For a person who is so sure of himself it makes many wonder why you even need to write all these threats on a blog 24/7 for 3 years to date. The word on the street is that you are nothing but hot air now and nothing more who will be going inside.

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Not quite 24/7.

But why I need to write the blog?

Because so monolithic is the corruption of the Jersey oligarchy - and so hopelessly inadequate is the mainstream media in Jersey - that someone has to do it.

It's got to be done - for the public good.

And of course - fighting against a corrupt oligarchy - in Jersey, the last bastion of openly practised corruption in Western Europe - is a difficult task.

No one ever said it would be easy or quick.

Am I going to be jailed?

Quite likely. They've done it once already - so why not again?

Does that deter me?

Not for one second.

Indeed - in terms of the overall objective of cleaning Jersey up - it helps.

It is, after all, the series of catastrophic mistakes - of errors of judgment - of the Jersey oligarchy these last few years that has furnished us with the ammunition.

And as far as my 'threats', in respect of the long-term consequences of my legal actions for the Jersey oligarchy - let me offer some advice: reserve your assessment until you've read the case.

A number of Jersey oligarchs - including current - and former - States members - are going to need an industrial stock of weapons-grade Imodium.

There are limits to what even the FACAWS will defend.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Q "Why did the prosecution not pass over the evidence held against Mr Christmas to his defence council?"

A So the defense can call foul,case dismissed & their man
(establishment)is cleared.

Anonymous said...

I am hearing that there are some people in America who are getting a bit annoyed that they have been ripped off by certain Jersey "ankers. Don't know if they would be too happy about seeing Mr Syvret ill treated somehow!

Anonymous said...

"The word on the street is that you are nothing but hot air now "

Ah yes, I know who you mean, they would be the fat walletted layabout gangsters who hang around on the corner of the Broad Road to Hell!

Anonymous said...

Comparative cases you requested.

Crown v Quinn etc:
Main prosecution witness Det. Martyn Le Brocq admitted on oath falsifying his notebook same as Quinn was acquitted of however Le Brocq was promoted & then left to retire on full pension as one of the "clan" who protected & did as he was told.

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

"Crown v Quinn etc:"

Ah yes, I had forgotten about that one.

I'll work that in too.

Keep em coming!

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Astonishingly, there do appear to exist beyond our shores jurisdictions with even more skewed legislative & judicial priorities than our own: I offer the following extract from Private Eye as light relief and as evidence that there are many other things in the world other than the antics of our elected 'members' and their 'civil' service that you couldn't make up. I think this almost trumps (if I may use that word in this context) the idea of drilling for underground Alpine streams in Jersey's sunny meadows. It would be oh-so-easy to satirise this by substituting blogging for the antisocial activity that is the chief subject matter of the following report:

"The release of intestinal gas may be natural but there has to be some control," Justice Minister George Chaponda told the Malawian Parliament in Lilongwe. "We are determined to mould responsible and disciplined citizens who do not foul the air and to severely punish idle and disorderly persons who behave in the wrong way. Under the Local Courts Bill, farting in public will become a punishable offence, as will the writing or uttering of naughty words, the publication of false news, the telling of fortunes, insulting the modesty of a woman, general naughtiness and refusing to bury dead family members. Local Courts will be set up specially to deal with these crimes, but civil matters will continue to be handled by the Magistrates Courts."

Opposition to the new bill has been led by John Tembo, a veteran of the Malawi Congress Party. "How can this government criminalise the release of intestinal gases?" he enquired. "Everyone does that, even if it's in public. There is nothing wrong with the present court system, and establishing these local kangaroo courts is not good for democracy."

Another MP added that "I had better hand myself over to the police or something, because I just this very second fouled the air while I was laughing at this proposal. Why should fouling the air take priority over corruption amongst legislators or the regulation of Chinese investments? I cannot understand this obsession with farting."

However, there was widespread support for the bill, including one MP who observed that "sometimes, breaking wind in public or during a meeting can be a disturbance of the peace, and the accompanying sound and odour can be most unpleasant."
(Afrik-News, 27/1/11. Spotter Dave Bilboa)

Is any reader able to refute the rumour that the Council of Ministers has recently sent a fact-finding legal team to Malawi, perhaps with a view to introducing similar legislation in Jersey?

I fear Stuart can look forward to being charged with 'general naughtiness' in the very near future...

Anonymous said...

Stuart,

The little charmer who asked why you wrote the Blog and spent so much time on this needs to get an education and possibly a life.

Since the mainstream media fail to cover the history of child abuse (and worse)the ongoing cover ups, the way you have been treated and all manner of illegal acts, it is vital to have a forum to expose all this in the public interest.

I should have thought that this was stating the bl***ing obvious but it is clear that there are some who do not, or will not, understand the situation.

Since those in power do not act in the public interest, then you are honour bound to do this.

Frances.

Anonymous said...

Stuart, don't get mad at me for saying this, but noone would think the worse of you if these criminals made a large out of court settlement for damages and you accepted it, for all the trauma they have put you through. It looks like they have made so many enemies that whatever happens now they are toast!

Anonymous said...

Stuart,

Another post, another topic.

Have you come across an organisation called, "The Common Purpose"?

I have heard that this is a truly vile outfit. They have a hidden agenda and their members are often responsible for taking children into "care".

It purports to be a charity and gets most of its funding from public sources. In the UK, many local authorities pay public funds to it surreptitiously.

{http://www.commonpurpose.org.uk/}

{http://www.stopcp.com/}

{http://cpexposed.com/}

Is this operating covertly in Jersy too?

Frances.

PS I hope I have managed to make the URLs stand out!

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

These people won't offer me a settlement.

They're simply not smart enough.

If they were going to do that - the opportunity was at a far earlier stage. Now - the moment has passed.

No - as I observed a while ago - their strategy will be to just carry on trying to fend-off the disaster - keep it grinding away for years in the various stages of court.

After all - they're not paying for it - it's all just you money - tax-payers money - that they are stealing from you - in order to try and protect themselves from the legal consequences of their own corruptions. So the cost is no object to them.

And it will suit their purposes very well to keep it all chugging along - inconclusively for five - or ten - years.

That way - most - if not all of the guilty parties will have long-since pensioned-off - and be forgotten.

Or - who knows - during those long years - I might have had an "accident".

That way - the legal cases die with me.

Oh well - better make sure the forthcoming application really spells out - exactly - just what it is we're dealing with - in the Jersey oligarchy.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Stuart,

You have made many references to having an "accident", or meeting with another fate in the near future.

Is this because you have received threats, direct, or otherwise?

Frances.

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Yes, Ive recived threats.

On many occasions.

But it isn't only me. Going from memory, one of the threats that VFC and me recived was that we were going to be "F*cking blinded".

However - you also have to learn how to detect subtleties in these matters - especially when dealing with the more powerful Jersey oligarchs.

The less stupid ones don't revert to the crude, overt threats.

Stuart

Zoompad said...

"These people won't offer me a settlement.

They're simply not smart enough."

I've never been offered a settlement either. I know other people who have, one women was offered a few thousand pounds and a resettlement in Wales, if she just quietly buggered off and kept her trap shut. I think she was a bit offended that they did not even stretch to the amount they had spent in persecuting her. The amouint they spent on persecuting me was at least £100,000. Its a lot of money to spend persecuting someone in order to cover stuff up, they would have been better off just giving me the proper abuse therapy I had been nagging them for in the first place, that Allan Levy QC said we who were abused were supposed to have instead of wasting all that cash persecuting me. They could have fobbed me off with a bit of equine therapy or something for less that £1000 and had change to spare, and I would never have found out about the secret family court corruption or anything. They dont seem to have much money sense, do they? For all their fancy education they seem a bit thick.

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Here you go; this was from shortly before I returned to Jersey:

"Stuart why don't you come back to Jersey so that the 26 victims of your pathetic self rightious blog can sue the fuck out of you one of which my father? Either that or beat the fuck out of you or your pathetic friends who only deserve a stanley knife across their faces. In fact why don't you go on the Phone in on Sunday and make a statement of all the pedophilse you know in Jersey live on air which you accuse on here seeing as you are so fucking sure of yourself? Yer, do that Stuart, show you really do have these people 'bang to rights' but I tell you I will kill you if you ever come back here and your friends will be attacked by me in the future I promise."

Classy stuff, eh?

And I thought my spelling was bad.

Stuart

Zoompad said...

"Either that or beat the fuck out of you or your pathetic friends who only deserve a stanley knife across their faces"

I suppose that includes all us abuse survivors as well. How unpleasant. So, all in all, what with folks threatening to blow peoples brains out, and slash them up with Stanley knives, you can see what sort of people they are, who are so desperate to cover up decades of child abuse. Now I know why God created hell. I used to think he was a bit harsh, I have changed my mind now!

Ian Evans said...

Very gracefully comprised, I give it a B+

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Zoompad, you have to understand that these people don't need "money sense".

It isn't their money; they don't have to pay a penny.

It's the tax-payers - or, if their insurance company happens to be run by a collection halfwits - the insurance investors' money.

What these people - the abusers, and even more so those who failed to protect children from abuse - have at their disposal is a virtually unlimited resource of funds, that they can deploy to protect their reputations.

These people don't care for one instant that it is clear from any objective, ethical consideration of the facts that the system has failed to protect children - or that it has unlawfully oppressed people like me. They don't care about the fact that it is inevitable - perhaps after five or ten years - their legal defence can only ultimately fail.

They're simply involved in a kind of long-term pass-the-buck.

These people do not care about the expense - nor that what they are defending is ethically and intellectually bankrupt.

They just don't want to be the person in post - when the excreta hits the fan.

And, of course, add to that the fact that so many of the key playas are lawyers, and why - there you go!

It's all actually quite a nice little earner - if they can keep it trundling on for a few years.

Don't ever make the mistake of judging these people who are defending the indefensible, by the standards of normal people.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

stuart you just keep doing what you are doing belive me you have very powerfull people looking after your back keep up the good work

rico sorda said...

SENATOR LE ARQUAND

Hi Stuart

Guess who is left holding the baby

rs

Anonymous said...

Stuart, it may interest yourself and your readers to know that the crown and the british government have the power to extend certain Acts to the channel islands, one of these Act being the Sex Offenders Act 1997 which includes sex offenders being put on a register.

I wonder why Jersey has never been made subject to the registration requirements of the Act?

Proud Survivor said...

Love the farting legislation in Malawi! How would they identify the culprit and enforce it?

Sadly I can see that nothing much has changed in the Malawi Government over the past 40 years. I lived there from 1968 - 1970 as my husband was working there. At the time President Banda was in charge and despite being a doctor trained in UK he soon went "native". European women could be arrested for wearing skirts above the ankle (in the days of mini-skirts). Anyone found with copies of Playboy magazine could be put in jail so a British government officer I knew rowed out into the middle of Lake Malawi and threw all his copies over the side in bundles weighted down with stones. The news on Malawi radio and the only newspaper in the country (oh yes!)was all about the President and what he was doing and how the whole country was "solidly behind him." No other news of any note was allowed. If one of Banda's politicians upset him he would be jailed along with his whole family. At the time there were dreadful "necklace murders" going on in the villages. People were arrested and jailed for these crimes to order - there was no evidence to link them to the murders. When a paediatrician was sent to an out-lying region to find out why children were dying he reported to Banda that they were dying of starvation. Banda would not accept this and sent the doctor back to find out why the children were dying!

I thought things might have improved in the years that followed. Maybe they have but it sounds as though things have just got plain silly.

Lorna

Anonymous said...

Regardless of what school one went to in Jersey, or what to social class one belongs. There is universal agreement that something is very, very wrong in our island. There can be little doubt in most rational peoples thinking (despite the spin by some), something quite dark and sinister has occurred within our island. Something so repulsive that it would bring about not only the downfall of the States of Jersey, but also one or two of the Islands leading families.

How otherwise do we explain the lies and cover ups that the states of Jersey have engaged in. How do we explain, the character assassination of people like our former chief of Police and his deputy, not to mention Stuart Syvret. These are men of proven competence and integrity, but men who our Government has spent Millions, yes millions of pounds of tax payer’s money in the attempt to destroy their personal and professional integrity - the question must be why?

Perhaps the answer is this, the money spent on destroying these good men. is but a fraction of what is at stake? Follow the money - it’s always about money in the end and its different guises’.

But let us also not forget that pillars of Christian society have been found guilty over the centries in various countries for advercating the harming children, ILM and his supporters spring to mind.! So Jersey is no different in this.

Writing from exile

Ian Evans said...

Lorna said

"Love the farting legislation in Malawi!"

Steady Lorna hun, one of my sponsored kids lives there! Poor little Ndasala....

Follow the LINK and go sponsor your own, cost you a pint of lager a week!

Hope you don't mind the advertising Stuart but this is worth doing :)

Anonymous said...

I was raised to the tears of prospective freedom generated by our brave brother Lyndon Farnham.

His rousing speech on Free Jersey Radio this morning was truly heroic. The wrath of the establishment party was palpable, the voice of the interviewer was shaking with emotion.

We must stand behind this heroic 'man of the people' now that our other 'false prophet' (you know who you are Stuart) has left us.

The drains in the Weighbridge Square may yet run with the blood of the people.

The sunlight high ground is within our grasp thanks entirely to brother Lyndon Farnham.

Proud Survivor said...

No offence intended to any sponsored children in Malawi Ian! I know what life was like for children in Malawi 40 years ago. I dread to think how much worse their lives are since the advent of HIV and AIDS. I am hoping to visit with a group that has links there soon.

Lorna
X

Anonymous said...

Half Term Question.

You use 'Groupthink' quite frequently and it is an appropriate term. However, I have very recently heard another that describes the issue in a slightly different way, it is the term 'Disease of the done thing'.

Compare and contrast in a Jersey context. You have 15 minutes .
Note the marks will not be deducted from your political credibility.

Anonymous said...

"The drains in the Weighbridge Square" are in an awful mess thanks to Lyndon Farnham & one Royal Yacht Hotel. Something stinks!

Anonymous said...

Stuart,

God forbid, but if you are "hit".

Do you have someone/s well briefed and a second copy of everything relevent, tucked away safely?

voiceforchildren said...

Stuart.

The COCF "Could" be used.

Anonymous said...

"The drains in the Weighbridge Square" are in an awful mess thanks to Lyndon Farnham & one Royal Yacht Hotel. Something stinks!

Royal Yacht allegedly going skint anyway all goods c.o.d @ moment why do you think Farnham wants back into the States

Anonymous said...

The Royal Yacht is a terrific building designed for the job with proper balconys, unlike Radissons and looked great this Xmas with its blue lights.

Was in the dynamic ground floor bar area one weekend for an hour very buzy and busy. Went on a Tuesday with some visitor friends to Jersey and there was more staff than punters

I counted six of us.

Can these big businesses survive on weekend trade only, cause it looks like that is all they are getting at the moment.

Its not just the small fish suffering in these times of less money about.

Anonymous said...

"Stuart,

God forbid, but if you are "hit".

Do you have someone/s well briefed and a second copy of everything relevent, tucked away safely? "

Stuart will be just fine. It wont be long before the storm breaks now. Stuart is not the only person complaining about this human scum called the Oligarchy of Jersey.

Anonymous said...

How Jersey 'Works'.

Isn't it about time you started to 'Work'. I have asked SS when they intend to pull you in and cut your benefit cheques like they do to everybody else.

Anonymous said...

'In Tripoli, anti-government protesters have reportedly ransacked the state television headquarters and set the central government building and a police station on fire.'

When I read this I thought it said:

'In Jersey, anti-government protesters have reportedly ransacked the (state) CT television headquarters and set the central government building and a police station on fire.'

Anonymous said...

OK so we've already established that senator pre-elect Farnham will be minister with special responsibility for clean air at the Weighbridge; but did you know the word is that after the Jersey anti-farting laws are introduced he's going to head a new ministry for the redistribution and relocation of weekend taxi ranks to a specially designated fart sanctuary, Liberation Square :)

Anonymous said...

Lyndon Farnham.

Royal Yacht allegedly going skint anyway all goods c.o.d @ moment why do you think Farnham wants back into the States.

If this is true, pray tell how he can be responsible for helping to run Jersey.

rico sorda said...

Stuart, Honestly why do you think Team Farnham are so desperate for those two extra seats?

I think we can rule out DEMOCRACY

rs

Anonymous said...

Did anyone watch Panorama tonight? Is it just me or does the Irish financial problem seem remarkably similar to ours except we're a few years behind?

rico sorda said...

Hi Stuart

As I look towards all this ex Deputy Farnham I want to be a Senator and Minister in the name of Democracy rubbish I started checking his voting. I was amazed at how often he wasn't ptresent.

LYNDON FARNHAM

I think people should check

rs

Anonymous said...

Lyndon Farnham
14th sept2004 - 1st Dec 2005

Of 350 voting opportunities

100 Not present
100 Pour
95 Contre
7 En defaut

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

A reader says:

"How Jersey 'Works'.

Isn't it about time you started to 'Work'. I have asked SS when they intend to pull you in and cut your benefit cheques like they do to everybody else."

You're a bit behind the curve there.

They already have done.

I took up a social housing tenancy back in December - and then - surprise, surprise - a couple of weeks later my Social Security "income support" towards the rent - mysteriously got "re-assessed" - basically, reduced by around 85%.

Now - there's a surprise, eh?

But, thanks for that very clear - independent - confirmation of just how "The Jersey Way" works.

From someone who so obviously knows how power is wielded in Jersey.

Just remember - all of you self-assured criminals - replete in your sense of invulnerability - are only secure for as long as your protector's are in power.

When the Bailhache Brothers have migrated to some other banana-republic - or they're in jail - no-one is going to be there for you.

Consequences.

Think about it.

You matter less than a pigeon in the Royal Square.

Whilst I don't agree with your motivations, I can at least understand why some people choose to be crooks; the ruthless self-interest.

But I just never could understand the idiocy of those who do crooked things - in starry-eyed obedience to the oligarchs - for mere crumbs from their table.

They say every person has their price. Well, I haven't yet encountered mine.

But if I were so inclined - and was risking jail for conspiracy to pervert the course of justice - or the common law offence of misconduct in a public office - I would - at the very least - be requiring as a bear minimum a £600,000 house.

But I guess some people are just thick - as well as being devoid of ethics?

They abuse their positions - to help oppress people - sell themselves so cheaply for a few dinner party invitations and a bit of name-dropping on the cocktail party circuit.

Hell - some people are so dumb they'll commit perjury - in exchange for a blind-eye to an expense account, which might amount to a few grand a year.

Dear oh dear.

If you're selling your soul - at least get a reasonable price for it.

Stuart.

Ian Evans said...

A delectable offering Mr Syvret Sir.

And....

"You matter less than a pigeon"!!!

That one should just about do it :)

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

A reader say:

"Stuart,

God forbid, but if you are "hit".

Do you have someone/s well briefed and a second copy of everything relevent, tucked away safely?"

Oh yes.

And far more than mere "second" copies.

Don't worry.

The djinn is out of the bottle - and there isn't any getting it back.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

"The djinn is out of the bottle - and there isn't any getting it back."

But why is it nobody outside this blog cares? You have attacked some senior personnel in the States with serious accusations yet they all behave like you don't even exist and life just carries on. Lundy is a prime example because I saw him in town smiling only recently. He couldn't give a monkeys about what you have to say about him its obvious and that goes for all the other so called child abusers you have been pointing the finger at.

Anonymous said...

Lyndon Farnham

Time to boycott SPAR & Royal Yacht?

Anonymous said...

"I took up a social housing tenancy back in December - and then - surprise, surprise - a couple of weeks later my Social Security "income support" towards the rent - mysteriously got "re-assessed" - basically, reduced by around 85%."

Another crime of malicious vindictive persecution to add to the list. This is a good one though, because this one is easy to check, you can get the name of the person responsible for this criminal offence very easily.

The more people join in with this persecution the more prison space will have to be found to house them all, that idea of turning old ships into prisons will have to be employed.

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

I think it a mistake to imagine that "nobody outside of this blog cares".

You'd be amazed.

Don't make the mistake of believing your own propaganda.

You're right though in one respect; the sense of invulnerability enjoyed by these people is indeed strong.

But that's only going to survive - for as long as their protectors do.

And how long will that be? Ogley's going in disgrace.

Stuart

Proud Survivor said...

Anonymous wrote
"Lundy is a prime example because I saw him in town smiling only recently. He couldn't give a monkeys about what you have to say about him its obvious and that goes for all the other so called child abusers you have been pointing the finger at."

He may be smiling but who knows what goes on inside his head and those of the other vile predators.

At the moment they may feel safe with the protection of so many powerful friends. However, they all need to invest in some incontinence pants because justice is inevitably coming and it will be more than farting that they will be charged with!

Lorna

Zoompad said...

"Lundy is a prime example because I saw him in town smiling only recently"

As a Christian believer I find that pretty chilling, because I do not believe he is a better man than any of the Pharasees Jesus was talking to in Matthew 23 v 33. It is a solemn and horrific thing to have to watch a man arrogantly condemning himself to eternal damnation. I find this really creepy, because (I think other Christian folk will understand me) I can usually find the words to interceed in prayer for most people, even paedophiles and murderers, but when I try to pray for this man it is as if a door slams shut. It creeps me out.

Zoompad said...

Just wondered, is Edmund Bailhache any relation to Philip Bailhache?

Anonymous said...

Stuart,

Whoever said that no one outside this Blog cares about the child abuse could not be more mistaken.

We all know that the events on Jersey with horrendous abuse of the children in the care homes, is not unique unfortunately. This is not an isolated incident and special to Jersey in any way. There have been many more cases in other areas and countries.

They appear to have common features and sometimes, the same names crop up as being the abusers.

Whereas years ago, the powers that be could succeed in covering it all up, the press never report such incidents, these days they cannot stifle the internet. This means that we can communicate with each other, pass on information and draw relevant conclusions.

"They" can no longer use their threats and influence to gag us. We will not go away. Time is running out for this bunch of sickos. Their power and influence is no longer enough for them to succeed in getting away with their heinous crimes. We are spreading the word,
naming names and imparting details. Exposing them for all to see them for the scum they are.

The way things are going, I would say they are seriously worried and resorting to further criminal acts to try and bluff, or buy, their way out. You have no hope scumbags.

Frances.

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

My, how my legal application just keeps growing!

Had a thoroughly amusing read of yet another item of fundamental evidence today.

It did make me chuckle.

Oh are they so not going to like this.

LMFAO.

Stuart

rico sorda said...

I have mentioned this before and I will mention it again. They want those Senators seats back because the poo poo la la is hitting the fan. This is not about Democracy. Since when has the upper reaches of Government and the LO been worried about Democracy.

Never in my wildest dreams in this conflict did I ever believe I would live to see the day when the JEP editorial started praising Deputy Labey like the second coming of christ. You no there is blind panic when this is happening. They also have an add taken out in the JEP for signatures (how much did that cost?) how desperate

I have told Deputy Labey that she was the last person I thought would be riding to the establishment rescue ( after all that has happened) but like the middle east, these are crazy times.

Who is going

Le Suer
Cohen
Perchard
Le main
Le Graisley
Shenton

Only 4 seats. Le Graisley gets in that leaves 3

Gorst will run for Senator

If Philip B runs it will be for Senator

You see Ozouf will have to build a ministry he can trust or the worms start escaping. Jersey Feudal Politics is very simple.

Why do you think there is blind panic?

Stuart I asked if you could give me your opinion on this. (i know you are busy)

Cheers

Ian Evans said...

MY NAME IS NOT BILL OGLEY!

hahaha, word v "pawpie"

Zoompad said...

Ian Evans has posted the best piece I have ever read on the Hollie Greig abuse scandal, and I do hope everyone will have a good read of it and make sure they share it widely.

http://therightofreply.blogspot.com/2011/02/stolen-from-david-jersey-theme.html

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Rico

I think you are correct in your analysis of why the oligarchy has suddenly become very worked-up about this issue.

They do now see the dangers of their core claque not having enough credible island-wide figures to enable them to form a cabinet.

However - I think you're wrong in supporting the reduction in Senator numbers; two wrongs don't make a right.

Of the three categories of member in the States - Senators, Constables and Deputies - the Senators are by far the most democratic - the most accountable.

OK - if you believe in States reform of the kind that would see one category of member - fine; but that has to either be achieved in a 'big-bang' - all-at-once change - or, if done incrementally, starting with the removal of the least democratic seats - namely the Connetables.

No matter what way you cut it - it simply doesn't make sense to start the process of reform by reducing the most accountable seats in the chamber.

You have to understand the motivations of most of the Deputies and Connetables who voted for this; they know most of them would never secure an island-wide mandate. Thus, they know they'll always be of a lower-status compared to those who could. They don't like - it damages their egos and their political ambitions. Which is why they've voted to reduce the Senators.

As far as Ozouf and his gang are concerned - hell - if the public want to elect half-a-dozen of them as Senators - so be it.

That's democracy.

The government people deserve.

At least they'll have been elected with some kind of credible mandate.

Did you know that the senior Connetable - ken Vibert - has never - not even when he first got in - never - faced a contested election.

Not once.

You cannot seriously object to Senators - when that kind of rotten-borough exist in jersey politics.

Stuart

rico sorda said...

I agree with most of what you say but we forget one thing " ThisisJersey".

We are possibly one election away from real change in the house.

Keep it the way it is, then after the election go for it, change whatever. But just like in the middle east this is about the now. 800 years of power and they are running out of members, the old guard are departing, Ozouf needs real support in their.

This not about reform right now this

Just like ILM is left holding the baby Ozouf is looking more and more isolated.

Yes, he got the support at the last sitting but not so in a lot of the speeches

Jersey Feudal Politics is very simple

rs

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Rico

Once again, I think you are being naively optimistic.

Don't ever think this is about one person - especially a silly little man like Ozouf.

He's merely a front-man.

The Jersey oligarchy is a highly lucrative syndicate; a criminal undertaking that suits extremely well - all levels of power in Jersey - seen and unseen.

So lucrative that a lot of powerful people outside of Jersey work and lobby for the protection of the corruption and abuses of power and democracy that take place here.

Even if Ozouf's particular power-base declined - he'd only be replaced by another oligarch.

There are only two things that are going to clean-up Jersey.

Public opinion - which will only wake up and get mobilised when confronted with the brute reality of economic meltdown.

And external pressure from places like London - which will only come about when the FACAWS get sufficiently embarrassed at having to support - in court - an overtly, highly-evidence, nakedly corrupt criminal regime.

That latter process begins soon.

Book your seats for the 14th march.

No quarter.

Stuart

rico sorda said...

"Even if Ozouf's particular power-base declined - he'd only be replaced by another oligarch."

Who?

Who is prepared to step into the abyss? The days of main stream media protection are gone. Just like being in a band not everyone can make a frontman. Ozoufs popularity is shot. The Internet is exposing these clowns left right and centre.

The Law Office and High Movers need control of the states, because no matter what, that is where legislation is passed. They need those seats back. They cant afford to loose Freddy what would happen to the esplanade quarter?

Stuart who would replace Ozouf?

Philip Bailhache?

I believe their is a chance that the establishment has already started to decline. Look how desperate they are for Farnham to get in. Im not saying they are finished but there is a decline.

The next election is huge

But I probably have this all wrong

only joking

Im bang on

rs

Anonymous said...

Zoompad,

Have you had any feed back from "Who nominated Frank Walker for his OBE".

Yet?

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Rico

You're quite right about one thing - the Law Officers and high movers need control of the legislature.

Most of the dorks in there simply don't realise they're puppets - dependent upon the patronage of the oligarchs - and people like The Rag Rapist.

As I said where last appearing before Sir Christopher Pitchers: -

"Jersey's indigenous judiciary and prosecution system is a criminal enterprise. It is routinely involved in racketeering, coercion, patronage, conspiracies to pervert the course of justice and misconduct in a public office."

So yes - the battle to clean-up Jersey - is a battle we must fight against the London appointed Law Officers.

Stuart

rico sorda said...

"Most of the dorks in there simply don't realise they're puppets - dependent upon the patronage of the oligarchs - and people like The Rag Rapist."

Now that is bang on Stuart. They are just cannon fodder. Right wing idiots and just plain idiots. Even when the argument is lost they will vote how they are told "The FSLM'.

The are no better than sheep and will nod where the power is. I would say some are scared.

In your time Stuart you would have seen some Dinosaurs come and go but have you ever seen the chamber so depleted of high powered movers. They ruled the roost before the states wage came in. Thats why pip wants it removed or lowered. Who are the real big shakes left in the states? like the ones from 20years ago?

Now we see the problem.

Now we see the panic

Time has caught up with 800 years of feudal power. Where is the bloodline?

Howard Sharpe says it all.... The line is broken

The Island is changing

No Internet= Pollard still in post. Warcup chief of Police. Ogley still in post etc etc

The Government cant carry on behaving the way it has. We are all making it change.

We are all in this together and must fight together

Jersey Feudal Politics is really very simple

rs

rico sorda said...

Thought your readers might like this. Big Trev cracked me up when he nailed Jim with this

3.1.8  Senator J.L. Perchard:

"It is with regret that I have heard a couple of speeches this morning that do this House a discredit really.  The tone of some of these speeches is unnecessarily provocative and aggressive and confront Members on an unequal basis, and I urge Members to just consider whether they are doing themselves, let alone this House, a service when they make some of these inflammatory speeches and remarks about other Members.  One Member spoke this morning against the proposition."

Deputy T.M. Pitman:

Could I seek clarification from the speaker, Sir, please?  The Senator talked about inflammatory nature of speeches.  Is that something that he would include when you tell another Member to go and slash their wrists, because I think those are things that really upset people, not people putting things across forcibly and that did offend a lot of people.  Is that something the Senator has learned?

The Deputy Bailiff:
Do you wish to respond, Senator?  Does any other Member wish to speak?

Silence lol 

Zoompad said...

My FOI request - WHO NOMINATED FRANK WALKER FOR AN OBE:

They refused to tell me, and gave me a ridiculous excuse, saying it was not in the public interest! I never read such nonsense in all my born days, have a look for yourself.

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/who_nominated_frank_walker_for_a#incoming-146996

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

As I've written previously - the awarding of honours to people in Jersey - and what 'rank' of honour they receive - is something that the Law Officers - like the Attorney General, Deputy Bailiff and Bailiff - have a de facto veto upon.

Them, and the suborned and co-opted Office of Lieutenant Governor.

They probably decide it over a dinner party.

That's why - no matter just how desperately fawning and groveling they will have been to those top-dog oligarchs - the likes of Reg Juene, Dick Shenton, Pierre Horsfall and Frank Walker only ever got OBEs - and never the Knighthood they all so desperately craved.

You see - if they had recived a Knighthood - as is usual for the Chief Minister in the Isle of Man - that would have placed them upon an equal rank with the Bailiff.

And we simply couldn't have that now - could we?

How frightful. Some jumped-up pleb - becoming a "Sir"?

Dear oh dear.

Whatever next?

Next thing you know, the proles will be wanting a Prime Minister and a separation of powers.

But there is a serious dimension to this; so serious - it is one of the matters I'm raising for judicial review.

Why do we not have full transparency concerning the award of honours to Jersey residents? For example - from who are the "soundings" taken? What is their authority? What criteria do they use? Are they conflicted?

Cutting to the chase - do they, in fact, use their power of veto - or power of endorsement - as a form of patronage?

A power - an influence - they use corruptly - in order to illicit obedience from unprincipled vassals?

Because if they do - well, that's a matter of grave public concern; one that goes to the heart of the public interest in respect of the proper functioning of public administration in Jersey.

An entirely proper matter to seek judicial review of.

Well - one has to find some entertainment in these battles.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Stuart,

A good move by Ben Shenton feeling the publics outrage.

Rob Du Hamel asked a question regarding the bonus paid to Steven Izatt in the states, was in based on productivity he asked?

If you can be bothered to look it up, it's on Hansard, Terry Le Suer said, NO the bonus is not based on productivity.

This has to be a first, even the rotten banks only pay their dealers bonuses if they make a shed load of money. So why would Le Suer who sits on the employment board give £30,000 -£20,000 a year earlier of other peoples money for no extra earned value.

Of course, you would think Izatt must have made money for someone, for his boss to be that generous.

A little while back Le Suer refused to say how much the top executives were earning and then, David Cameron two days letter published the amounts the chief executives of councils and quangos earned in the UK.

Finding himself looking stupid, Le Suer then published.

Is anyone really convinced that Mr Hospital is not getting £312,000 a year. Time for a politician seeking re-election to ask for a breakdown on the shop floor of the States. If Le Suer refuses, and does not offer proof the answer is evident.

Anonymous

Anonymous.

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Yes - the Shentons were always masters at populist opportunism.

Precious little there though - when substance and courage was required.

No more accurate words could be found to sum-up the Shenton 'contribution' to politics, than these famous words from Macbeth:

"it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing."

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Mr Syvret the chip on your shoulder hasn't half grown lately!

Poor poor you!

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

That you Ben - or Debbie?

"chip on my shoulder"?

No.

It's simply a case believing that it's wrong for public administration to conceal decades of monstrous child abuse.

It's a belief the politicians owe a duty of care to the public - that they're elected to protect the public from the defects of public administration - not protect public administration from the public.

Especially when those members of the public happen to vulnerable, abused children.

It's a case of standing up for what is simply right - instead of engaging in contemptible smears of a fine and courageous police officer who was striving to investigate the suffering of those children.

Lenny Harper has more courage and integrity in his little finger - than the entire Shenton family could muster combined.

No "chip on the shoulder" - merely the same - consistent - implacable determination I have always had to fight for what is right, from before I entered politics.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Stuart,

Well done reply to the comment about a chip on your shoulder. It can only help when you bring the topic back to the issue of grave systematic abuse and the associated corrupt cover-ups. It is the one truth your enemies are terrified of, because they know it has the power to destroy them. They arrogantly accuse you of trying to destroy Jersey, as if their corruption itself was synonymous with the very island. No. Only the full truth will save the island from the undercurrent of evil.

Anonymous said...

Glad you are publishing some of these nasty comments from the lowlife. People can see for themselves exactly how cruel these creeps are. Children died at that horrible childrens lock up, they seem to have forgotten that fact.

Anonymous said...

Shenton is right to question the obscene pay awards to the senior civil service spongers but he is wrong to have waited till the election year to do it. He has had five and a half years to do something about it and nothing has changed. All talk.

Anonymous said...

Its comments like that from abuse supporters, that prove you have lots of work still to do. Keep on going.

Ian Evans said...

WHISTLEBLOWER COULD FACE JAIL!

Anonymous said...

Slightly of topic, so apols; but it appears that the States have been lying to us over the exam results our children have been getting.

The States lying to the public huh? As our cousins across the Pond say: Go figure ....

Well there's another precedent set for our legal fraternity to use.

The Beano is not the Rag

Anonymous said...

Dear Mr Syvret,

It does appear that you have the benefit of a crystal ball, as another States department crumbles through lack of proper controls and accountability.

It is worse. We are told tonight Mr Thorne from planning is to retire early.

Mr Thorne should not be retiring, he along with others including Mr Le Gresley assistant director and Liz Clapshaw ( now Mrs Ashworth ) senior planning officer should be hauled in front of a disciplinary committee and sacked or demoted over their sad and corrupt involvement in the Reg’s Skips fiasco.

Essential checks, balance and accountability have completely broken down in Jerseys planning department of which these three, are long time and leading employees.

From the report.

For an area of administration so intimately connected with the interface between public and private rights, and where procedure must be unquestionable and seen to be so in order to ensure fairness, we can say only that we were flabbergasted by the lack of written procedures, rules or guidance. It was, and if it still obtains is, a systemic
weakness of the first order.
-----------
I strongly suggest that any person or company that may have any dealings with Jersey’s planning Department read the report below which mentions all names, personal incompetence, lack of procedure, no procedure, allowing a third party to use the planning department almost at will to read confidential documents ( corrupt) and a lot more. The first chapter is slow and then it reads like a novel from hell.


www.statesassembly.gov.je/documents/reports/35208-5007-1692010.pdf


Anonymous.

Anonymous said...

Its comments like that from abuse supporters

That just about sums it up...

Either you want a Jersey Historic Child Abuse Committee of Inquiry or you are effectively supporting child abuse, historic or not.

It doesn't get much simpler than that.

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

A reader has submitted a link to a Seattle web site - but the link doesn't work.

Sorry, but i don't publish links unless I know what I'm linking to.

If you want to check it and re-post, I'll consider it.

Stuart

Ian Evans said...

You want to go to annex 3 at the bottom transcript of telephone conversation looks interesting

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

A reader says:

"Dear Mr Syvret,

It does appear that you have the benefit of a crystal ball, as another States department crumbles through lack of proper controls and accountability.....etc."

Oh I've scarcely started working on Jersey's planning corruption.

Well - apart, that is, from just scratching the surface a little - re Tel Boy Le Main - Noel - the Bailhache Brothers - Dave - in-no-way-bent - Minty, the amazing disappearing man - and one or two others - during the by-election.

But - hell - people get the government they deserve.

But don't worry - it's in the list.

Oh is it ever in the list.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
People have always speculated about backhanders in the planning department.
Can anyone confirm that there is a specific, current case which is being kept very quiet?

Friday, 18 February 2011 19:04:00 GMT

Strange that only a few days after this posting that there should be 'early retirements' amonst senior officials. What really is going on at the planning department?

Anonymous said...

Interview with the new Police Chief so far and not a single question or comment on historic abuse.

Anonymous said...

The BBC phone-in with new Police Chief Bowron this morning was a complete waste of an hour of my life. No searching questions, just an easy ride for him.

He even evaded a couple of questions and wouldn't give a straight answer - which doesn't bode well!

voiceforchildren said...

Stuart.

The interview with Mike Bowron this morning couldn't have looked more stage managed if it tried. No searching questions and he knew what he was going to be asked, hence had the stats to hand.

Yet another example of State controlled media courtesy of the BBC, who are becoming less and less relevant.

Anonymous said...

•Report abuse

•Lee Ving de Ship
Posted February 24, 2011 at 11:07 am
I have just mistakenly taken off my rose tinted glasses and I am horrified!

Education = a shambles and years of covering up the true position

Planning = departmental shambles. Badly exposed in Reg’s Skips case amongst others

Tourism = run to the ground and under invested in favour of finance

Agriculture = see tourism

Finance = well, the rest of the world don’t like it so let’s keep tweaking the old 0/10 until we get it right shall we? In the meantime keep upping GST and hit the poor, the elderly, in fact, hit anyone who isn’t rolling in it.

Home Affairs = a complete mess exposed in the Power debacle and the illegal activites of the police in the Warren case, amongst others. A minister who thinks he is still a magistrate by the way he still uses phrases like “in my judgment”.

Health = a complete mess. We can’t keep a minister in there for more than 5 minutes but can afford a stupidly expensive consultant to fix it.

TTS = roads falling apart, useless transport system, incinerator scandal(s) etc etc etc etc

Civil service = No accountability, no sackings but plenty of early retirements and golden handshakes. A healthy but inept spin doctoring department (it worked for a while boys).

Ministerial government = a group of people who ‘welcome’ unfavourable reports, claim to ‘learn lessons’ from them but actually just carry on as before. Will never accept responsibility for something going wrong. Opposed to any form of truth, honesty or transparency. A Chief Minister who can easily spend 15 minutes talking without actually answering the question put to him.

Have I missed anything? I must have so feel free to add to the growing list of failures/cock ups/scandals…

I shall put my glasses back on now because I don’t like what I see.

Ahh, that’s better. What a wonderful place Jersey seems again.

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

You left a Law Officers department that are a collection of racketeering gangsters.

The government you deserve.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

'racketeering gangsters'.

Don't hold it back Stuart, give it your true opinion.

Incidentally, how's your legal work going?

You've said they're not going to like it. Can you give as a few clues as to what's the angle your case argument is taking?

Is going to really, really annoy them?

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Oh yes - it's going to really, really, really annoy them.

'A few clues?'

Well - as I said in court, and in comments here, I'm not confining the application to merely the criminal appeal. Were I to do so, it would artificially limit the range of relevant matters that need to be examined by a court.

Therefore the application is combining criminal appeal - human rights - and judicial review.

Hmmm.....how many clues should I give?

Let me put it it this way - of those three broad strands - I'm regarding the criminal appeal as the least important.

I'm focusing on the fundamentally ultra vires structure of what passes for a prosecution system in Jersey.

And naturally enough - I'm taking a detailed examination of a significant number of overtly politically contaminated decisions - to prosecute - but more significantly - to not prosecute - in differing cases.

Drawn from the last 20 or so years.

Some of those cases - you won't be surprised with - as they're in the public realm - but some of the other cases - are not.

As I said in a comment yesterday - no quarter.

Stuart.

Ian Evans said...

Anon

You forgot our wonderful "accredited" media.

How could you?

Anonymous said...

Go on, give us another clue Stuart?

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Give you another clue?

Well, I don't know about that - oh all right then - here's just one random paragraph:

"The two politicians in question are Senator (then Deputy) Sarah Ferguson, and Deputy Colin Egre. The acquaintance they sought to rescue from prosecution was one Roy Boschat. Both Ferguson and Egre had been members of the amateur parish police - long-seen as an entry route into the world of connections, influence, protections and favouritism of “The Jersey Way”, and frequently a spring-board into politics. Having – as an honorary police officer – done a wide range of “favours” to influential people in the parish – effectively having a well-developed range of “client” relationships – will often secure the strong backing of the parish establishment for a later run at political office. Once established, such networks of racketeering, in which influence and authority are the traded goods, are effectively fixed in place permanently."

But don't get too excited - the case referred to there - as an example of the fundamentally racketeered nature of the criminal justice system in Jersey, is already publicly well-documented.

It's the new stuff that's going to be - err - exciting.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Stuart,

I fully understand now, why Freddie Cohen was upset that Ben Shenton taped their telephone conversation,


FC: I get people phoning me all the time about planning applications and it is always the same story. They have been let down by the Department, that everything is too slow, the Department is hopeless and it is quite difficult to deal with

because half of the complaints are valid

and the other half are just...they are trying it on.
....

If the planning department, did not effect or harm anyone which it does, the strain caused Mr Pinel to suffer a heart attack, and to take out heavy loans, you would think it a double for the old carry on comedy films.

Why on the Lords earth do we have to pay these egotistical brainless idiots. It’s a clear case of theft from the outrageous charges planning levy and the tax revenue paid to them.

Freddy Cohen is a minister that is fully aware that his department is 50% wrong, but prefers to build iconic building on the coast rather than make sure his department is acting fairly, professionally and in the public interest,.

If asked in the States as you were, do you have full confidence in your department, he obviously could not answer yes after what he said above. I wonder if the civil servants would have a meeting as they did with you and have him removed.

Anonymous.

rico sorda said...

THE NAPIER TRICK BLINK AND YOU WILL MISS IT

RS

Anonymous said...

Stuart , when you were ejected from the States for pointing out the conflict of interest concerning Reg Jeune
Did the Baliff give orders that your mail was to be
Withheld ?

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Why, yes - he did.

That in addition to the general criminality of supporting and protecting his corrupt friend Reg Jeune.

As I said a while ago - there must be an anti-racketeering meme doing the rounds.

All these coincidences - people thinking of the same subjects - making them topical.

Yep - all those clear - prima facie examples of outright criminality - misconduct in a public office, for example - are all being cited.

Not one of these crooks - prosecuted.

Oh well - Phick Phil can explain it all to the electorate when he runs later this year.

But - as I said, those cases of gangsterism and non-prosecution are already in the public sphere.

One or two others - that aren't - yet - are going to prove altogether more exciting.

In fact - unless I'm mistaken - Phil was Solicitor General - at the time of one particular instance of non-charging and non-prosecution - that's going to be cited.

Hey - don't blame me. You guys decided you wanted total war.

You've got it.

No quarter.

Stuart

Nick Palmer said...

For those who suspect that a lot of journalism these days is more like "churnalism" - where the hack just cuts and pastes from generic articles so they don't need to much original research or stories - a new website
click for website link to churnalism.com lets one enter text from a "suspect" story and it shows you where else an almost identical story appeared, thus showing the lazy hacks/newspapers up.

Rob Kent said...

A relevant comment from a Julian Assange interview with Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet:

Kommentar frÃ¥n Gustav F: Don't you believe that "white lies" are a necessety for a functional government? I.E. the US ambassador’s personal judgments of certain European leaders.

Julian Assange: The lies we have exposed are not white. They are the highest order concealment of criminality. If governments that conceal reality from their peoples cannot function when those realities are revealed, that's fine by me. Let them be replaced with ones that do not.


http://wlcentral.org/node/1370

Anonymous said...

Any comments on the following extract from the Guernsey Press?

"Jersey Treasury minister Philip Ozouf (pictured) recently claimed that its laws were taking longer to come into force than previous years and said it was causing difficulties for the island’s finance industry. He suggested that a lack of resources at the Ministry of Justice was to blame.

But a Policy Council spokesman said Guernsey laws were being passed at the same speed as in recent years."

Philip said...

"... lack of resources at the Ministry of Justice was to blame"

So I wonder what they are doing instead then. Covering tracks? .. surely not ...


The Beano is not the Rag

voiceforchildren said...

Stuart.

Law Office(r)s 2

Ian Evans said...

THE ANSWER TO OUR PRAYERS

Ian Evans said...

A JERSEY TALE, IN PICTURES

Anonymous said...

With regards to your Income support Stuart, if you go to SS web site the figures are there plain to see. If you dropped 85% then there was a reason. If you feel it is wrong then challenge it, they do have a chain of command and you know who is in charge. Pretty sure he would look at your case if you are as hard done by as you say. I am one of your supporters who knows the SS system very well, so why don't you question it if it is persecution which has dropped your payment by 85%.
Also is The real truthseeker JTM?

Anonymous said...

Baroness the new chairman of JDC?


Baroness Margaret Ford
BARONESS Margaret Ford has been recommended as chairman of the Jersey Development Company.

Currently she is in charge of securing the long-term development of the Olympic Park after the 2012 Games.

If the States approve her appointment she will start the role in Jersey in April.

The Jersey Development Company will eventually replace the Waterfront Enterprise Board, which was responsible for only developing the Waterfront.

Article posted on 26th February, 2011 - 3.00pm

WTF

How much is this dorris going to cost us?

Anonymous said...

Stuart,

Obviously people are still interested in reading the Reg’s Skips Report. It can be found at.

www.statesassembly.gov.je/frame.asp
Then click on reports at top of page - then go to section below and click on

Year 2010 report 118