Wednesday, 19 October 2011

A REMINDER:

The Policies - and Qualities

Of Stuart Syvret

A brief reminder for those who may not have made their mind up yet, of some of the policies I support – and the personal qualities I offer as a politician.

The polls opened at 8.00 a.m for the island’s general election, and people will be able to vote until 8.00 p.m.

I am a candidate for the post of Senator.

I’m asking that people vote for me because I believe I have the abilities – and the qualities – this community needs in its parliament.

I am keeping this posting brief; I hope the public will already know enough, to understand the issues.  

I have written below two, brief, lists. The first itemises ten key policies I pledge to pursue should I be elected.

The second is the list of qualities – as a politician – and as a person - that I offer the people of Jersey.

If I am elected – I pledge that, within the first twelve months of the term-of-office, I will bring before the States assembly propositions that will address the following policy areas:

Taxation and Economic Policies: A Transparent Inquiry:

In 2004 – at a time when Jersey’s taxation polices faced great upheaval, I studied the matter carefully, and recognised just how shallow and defective was the thinking of the traditional establishment when trying to address the problems. Many options were not examined – certain obvious and key strategic issues not properly appraised – and the policies they proposed, such as 20 means 20, and zero/10 were never going to work properly. In an attempt to get the States to at least undertake a detailed examination of the real issues, I wrote a detailed report and position, “Taxation Policies: A Transparent Inquiry”, which asked the States to examine the issues properly. Predictably, the assembly rejected my proposition. It gives me no pleasure to say “I told you so” to those politicians. Now – we need to undertake that work more urgently – and more comprehensively - than ever.

Protection of Employment Opportunities for Resident People:

Jersey faces many serious economic challenges, not least growing unemployment. We have the ability and right to introduce a system of work-permits, to protect employment opportunities for those already resident in Jersey. Such a policy has always been resisted by the traditional political establishment, but it can no longer be avoided if we are serious about tackling unemployment.

A Public Inquiry into Jersey’s Child Protection Failures:

The States has recently agreed to ask the Council of Ministers to establish an inquiry into the decades of child protection failures on the part of the States. Whilst credit must be given to those States members who drove that decision – the reality is, it’s too little – too late. And any meaningful and robust inquiry cannot involve the Council of Ministers, or the Law Officers in drawing up the terms of reference. Those two bodies are the two most culpable authorities in Jersey for the gross failures of governance, oversight and the application of the rule of law that lies at the heart of the systemic problems. The child protection issues will remain a source of injustice – and of division – until finally examined properly.

A Revision of the Island Plan and the Planning Law:

The States has recently approved an Island Plan. Whilst it has good aspects – it does not protect our environment well enough. It needs improving and refining. Our Planning laws, too, are inadequate. The Planning Minister has too much power. We must revert to a Committee which works in a transparent manner.

A Public Inquiry into Jersey’s Accommodation Industry:

When Jersey’s economy is discussed, it is usually in terms of sectors such as finance, tourism, retail, agriculture etc. What we never hear discussion of is the accommodation industry. That whole sphere of economic activity – which includes property speculation, construction, land-ownership, housing, home-sales, the rental sector, re-zoning, estate-agents, building supplies etc – is - after the finance industry – the second largest economic sector in Jersey. But yet – remarkably – the States has never undertaken a strategic appraisal of that whole industry – and the economic and taxation polices that are associated with it. I believe we must finally get to grips with, and fully understand, the accommodation industry, and its role in Jersey’s economy and society.

A Separation of Powers:

Virtually every respectable, functioning democracy in the world has a separation of powers. That is – a clear separation between the legislature, the executive, the prosecution system and the judiciary. Those necessary powers are separated – so that they be independent of each-other and capable of acting as a check and balance on each-other, to protect the public good from the excesses and failings of any public authority. Jersey does not have an effective separation of powers. The result has been disastrous for this community. For example – the extent of the child protection failures – and the failure to hold the public sector to account – is a direct result of our present, conflicted system. We must have a separation of powers.

A Review of Policing in Jersey:

Events of recent years – such as the illegal suspension of Police Chief Graham Power – and other examples of corrupt, politically motivated interferences with policing – have shown that law-enforcement in Jersey needs protecting improper pressures and corrupt manipulations. We must have a judicially empowered, external inquiry into policing – to ensure the great majority of ordinary, decent people are protected from illegal acts by the powerful, the influential and the States.

A Public Interest Disclosure Act:

One of the most important methods of ensuring that public authorities are acting reasonably, effectively and lawfully, is to ensure that there is robust protection for whistleblowers. Jersey has no such protection – indeed, the opposite is the case – with it being the standard practice of all of Jersey’s public authorities to unit in the persecution of anyone who has exposed wrong-doing. The island must introduce a Public Interest Disclosure Act to give protection to those who reveal failures and crimes.

A Public Inquiry into the Role and Conduct of the Media in Jersey:

In a functioning democracy like the United Kingdom, the established media often exposes failures and wrongdoing by the powerful and the government. In Jersey, the mainstream media acts in the opposite way, frequently helping to conceal failures and criminal acts by the island’s public authorities. In the UK, a major public inquiry is underway into the conduct of the media and its relationship with politicians and business. Jersey must undertake the same exercise.

Citizens Juries: Involving the Public in Contributing to Policy Formulation:

In Jersey, we don’t embrace party politics. Some people see that as a good thing. However, the consequence is that we, the voting public, have no control over the actual policies our government pursues. We have to change that. A system of Citizen’s Juries would enable representative cross-sections of the community to contribute to the formulation of States policies.

In addition to an understanding of the policies your politicians will pursue, it’s also important to have an understanding of the personal qualities of those who would be your representatives. And in the absence of party-politics in Jersey, it’s even more important for voters to choose people of high integrity and personal calibre.

These are the personal qualities I possess:

I am honest.

I am intelligent.

I am sincere.

I am ethical

I work hard.

I bring a degree of intellectual rigour to researching political polices.

I do not come from a privileged background – so I genuinely understand the day-to-day realities faced by working families. 

I am empathetic.

I am principled.

I am fearless.  

Today we are participating in Jersey’s first general election. I hope as many islanders as possible use their right to vote.

Stuart

243 comments:

1 – 200 of 243   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

I'll be voting for you today... Good luck, we need you back...x

Anonymous said...

Good luck Stuart - There's a lot of good people voting for you - Let's hope we outweigh the bad!

Anonymous said...

Just vored Syvret alone 8 Trevor Pitman alone.

Anonymous said...

Vote for people who care about others, not those in it for their own selfish interests!

Ian Evans said...

Guess who I voted for?

Very best wishes for a man of sheer integrity, and let us hope the voters have wised up some :)

Anonymous said...

Good luck Stuart !!! please can someone post suggestions for deputy district 1 ASAP thanks !!

Anonymous said...

Just seen a disgusting email saying not to vote Le Gresley as he is apparently anti finance.
What rubbish.
Will be voting Syvret,Le Gresley and Hill later.

martin said...

stuart have have allwas had my vote and as long as you stand allways will the very best of luck tonight,as anon says lets hope good people on this island get out and see you are our best hope and vote

Anonymous said...

Excellent, good luck Stuart u have my vote and most others I have spoken to are voting for u. We'll be calling for a recount of the votes if u don't get in! :-)))

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

St. Helier no. 1

Nick Le Cornu

Paul Le Clair

Trevor Pitman.

Definitely - DEFINAITLY - NOT Judy Martin; a liar and a traitor.

Remember the story in last night's JEP, about the atrocity of the Social Services failure?

That's the kind of thing I was battling to expose.

Judy Martin has - absolutely - knowingly - and directly - worked, in corrupt and devious ways, with the senior civil servants responsible, in an effort to help them cover-up such failures.

She has been the tame and captured Assistant Minister for Health & Social Services for years - and has responsibility for child protection.

The only people she's tried to protect are the bent senior managers.

She has to go.

Stuart

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Voting in St. Clement?

DAVE CABELDU.

An excellent candidate.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

My preferences for senator are Syvret, Le Gresley, Forskitt.

Anonymous said...

just voted for Stuart ,good luck
there was a pen in the booth i thought strange so i removed it ,you never know it could be tactics for spoilt papers ,

Anonymous said...

good luck today Stuart, it was a pleasure to put an extra heavy X alongside your name this morning in lawrence.

What was confusing though, was there was also a pen in the voting booth!... I resisted the ink stink though!

Anonymous said...

Job done Stuart, two votes added and there will be two more later, the very best of luck .

Anonymous said...

Good Luck just gave you my vote, pos all who have voted for Stuart can post to confirm such.

Anonymous said...

Lyndon Farnham

Good guy or not.
History please someone

Anonymous said...

"Voting in St. Clement?

DAVE CABELDU.

An excellent candidate.

Stuart"

I have just come back from doing just that Stuart as well as my vote for you and one or two others!!

Good luck, we desparately need you back in the States where you belongs x

Anonymous said...

Well I wish you best of luck and I really hope you get in, but I have a fear that you won't somehow

Anonymous said...

Lyndon Farnham is for the rich so no way hes getting my vote !! for me one vote only Stuart Syvret !!!

Anonymous said...

HELP asap !
for DEPUTY in St Brelade no.1
I was going to go for John Young (ex planning Chief exec !)
choice is: Margaret Holland Prior, Jeff Hathaway, Angela Jeune, John Young
or is Jeff Hathaway better ? or MHP even ?

CONSTABLE
Stephen Pallet OR Mike Jackson (not nececaryly any worse than any of the other constables - apart from part in the waste fo money remodeling the avenue using ourside contractors paid ror by the fiscal stimulus fund !!? - was he conplicit or stupid ?

For SENATORS I have combiined Syvret's & Wimberley's recommendations to come up with:
Linda Corby
Mark Forskitt
Francis Le Gresley
Stuart Syvret

is Darius Pearce a bit of a chancer who is in it for Darius Pearce ?

Anonymous said...

REMEMBER !!!!!

Now you need photo ID with you to vote
(that is correct isn't it ? )

This means DRIVING LICENCE or PASSPORT
& nothing else ?

Anonymous said...

Good luck Stuart I voted for you only + Pallet for Constable & Tadier for Deputy St Brelade parish of course fingers crossed for to night !!!

Anonymous said...

For those obsessed with pens and pencils I can assure you that there is a PEN AND A PENCIL in each of the booths at St Clement. The voter is entirely able to chose which to use.

Anonymous said...

John de Carteret letter supporting cohen jep tonight.
Payback time after permission to build 6 houses in his field by dandara for 600k,no free lunches !!!!!

Anonymous said...

sorry st clement i will give you your pen back sometime ha ha. good luck ss

Raymac said...

Best of luck today Stuart, you are by far the best opposition to the Establishment.

Anonymous said...

Stuart, 3 votes for you in St. Helier 3/4. Good luck!

Nick Palmer said...

I can confirm that there was a biro in one of the St Lawrence booths; also there was two heavy pencils in the next door one.

Incidentally, I'm glad the JEP published my latest letter tonight, which was adding the bits that Daniel Wimberley left out of his blast of a letter against the lack of integrity, honesty etc of the current States.

Mine was mainly pointing out that the only solution to economic difficulties that the current lot recognise - restoring growth - is no longer appropriate, or even safe.

BTW, I only emailed it on Monday morning and did not expect then to publish so soon, so not much repression of alternative viewpoints before an election there!

Jill Gracia said...

Did not need photo ID at Grouville, and only pens in the booths.

This should be made standard across the board, as people are very confused.

Anyway, two votes from this household Stuart.

Bueno Fortuna!

Anonymous said...

Farnham standing outside Maufant polling station (well away from the entrance), giggling with Ozouf.

Anonymous said...

Just been down St Helier 3/4 put my driving license on the table and was told we dont need it we know you!! Never met the person in my life, well I dont think so anyway. Maybe it was an old family friend I didnt recognise, you know what its like over here!!

Stuart got my vote as did Mark Forskitt, I was unsure about voting for anyone else other than Stuart but the fact I could hardly breath due to the traffic when I got down queens road I put a cross in his name being as he is environmentaly friendly. Also ended up putting a cross for Linda Corby, I dont think she will come close to be honest as probably not well known enough, thats just my opinion but hoping that if she gets enough to make it worth her while trying again that she will.

Good luck Stuart and Mark and Linda.

Only did 3 deputies aswell. Mike higgins as I really think he is a worth person. Ted Vibert just because I can and Jackie Hilton because of her work on the overpopulation problems of Le Pouqulay. Good luck Mike, Ted and Jackie too.

Anonymous said...

At least six votes for Syvret, in my family.

Anonymous said...

use your four senator votes. Dont waste any of them

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Slowly working may way around the polling-stations - but running behind schedule.

Will try and get to as many as possible. If I don't make all of them, apologies.

St. Ouen looked pretty busy!

As did St. Clement when I was there.

Stuart

jubo said...

You got my vote, good luck x
Are the drinks on you tonight Stuart as I'm sure you will get in?

Anonymous said...

4 for Syvret in St.Martin

Anonymous said...

Stuart, Good Luck from Guernsey.

Anonymous said...

Boss (loads of money) said you are a dangerous anarchist and also sent the anti Le Gresley email to all users. he voted Bellyache and Cohen.
Me and 4 others are voting Syvret.

Anonymous said...

Voted.

Syvret
Le Gresley

Cabeldu

Peed off nobody stood against Norman.

Ben P said...

Hi Stuart. First time poster, long time reader.

I've just finished voting at St. Ouen's Parish hall. I spoke to a few people while i was there, and was quite surprised at the kind of comments i was getting. Most people i spoke to do not want Philip Bailhache or Freddie Cohen in the States, and there was a lot of support for you. Surprisingly (considering they mostly only read the JEP) a lot of the more elderly residents had good words to say about you. So for once, i really am not sure which way it is going to go.

Good luck. Most of my friends and family are voting for you, so hope it is a good night for you.

Ben

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Well, that's all folks - as far as voting goes.

Sorry wasn't able to post comments earlier; been speaking to people at the polling-stations. I manged to get to everyone in the end apart from Town Hall & St. Helier No.2. Apologies - just ran out of time.

Had some very interesting conversations, too.

Thank you - to everyone who has voted for me - helped me - and assisted me - in anyway. Not just in respect of this election - but during these last few years.

No matter what the outcome - we've all done our best, in a collective effort to make Jersey's public administration transparent and accountable - and to try and ensure that the weak are protected from the powerful.

As I remarked in an earlier comment - to all those people I'm trying to help - to those I'm fighting for - rest assured that I shall be continuing to do that, whether elected or not.

Right - going to have glass of wine and chill now.

Thanks

Stuart

Anonymous said...

A couple more for you.

The Beano is not the Rag

Ian Evans said...

Grateful for all your efforts Stuart :)

Anonymous said...

CTV exit poll puts you 7th and Bellyache top.......we're all doomed

Anonymous said...

Good luck from the USA. We fear for the future of Jersey if you aren't elected.

Tony Gallichan said...

Damn. We lost Bob Hill. Whats the new chap like... any good or a foot stomper?

Good to see Caroline back in... at least we know she won't take stick...

moral_rightness said...

I wish you all the best Stuart, I really hope you get in again.

Anonymous said...

That sucks, losing Bob Hill, after all his campaigning for justice.
Govt you deserve, forshame :(

Anonymous said...

Kristina Moore as well?!!
We're being slaughtered by the "I'm alright" crowd :(
At least Kevin Lewis and Tracey Vallois are back - who have been known to vote the right way

Anonymous said...

power back in at st brelade...

I hate elections, always full of disappointment

Anonymous said...

I predicted the top four finishers in the senatorials.

And so far after two results I'm disappointed that my prediction is coming true.

Is this a blip of the sad reality?

Anonymous said...

Looks like Jersey is screwed, last one out, turn the lights off, Glad I left years ago

Anonymous said...

At least that tw*t Le Main has gone

Anonymous said...

At least Kevin Lewis and Tracey Vallois are back
Kevin Lewis that doesn't know a cellar when he sees one!!

Anonymous said...

Stuart
You lost a lot of support by refusing to do community service. Anyway seems you can continue to occupy yourself by being a professional litigant at taxpayers expense.

Ian Evans said...

"The Jersey Child Rape Party" is flying!!!

BOY! who didn't see that coming?

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

A reader says:

"Stuart
You lost a lot of support by refusing to do community service. Anyway seems you can continue to occupy yourself by being a professional litigant at taxpayers expense."

Well - it isn't a profession - more a vocation; one which I have to follow - on behalf of vulnerable people.

But, yes - as I've always made perfectly clear - the battle to clean-up Jersey's public administration was always going to be a legal path against the UK justice secretary.

And the fact the oppressions that have happened to me in the last four years have been led by a directly conflicted, corrupted and structurally unlawful prosecution system led William Bailhache - and judges who are his friends - adds great weight to the legal case.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

I cannot believe this Island votes for a climate change denier in St Clement, and rejects a real environmental brain for Senator.

Do they understand anything?

Anonymous said...

Deidre Mezbourian saw off the Bailhache acolyte James Le Feuvre in St Lawrence. One good result amongst the dross.

However, we should realise that the right wing only win because they get out the vote. They are organised and efficient. If we want to break their stranglehold on the island we need to get it together. It will take years but it can be done.

Jersey is horribly conservative but there is a streak of non conformism that can be tapped. What we are up against is a slick and sickly wave of corporate drone politicians who have sold out to finance. They get in because they exploit the fear that our finance industry, and thus our way of life, is in peril from the left.

The irony is that our way of life is in peril due to the very system they operate.

Don't despair, we are many more than you think and we are only just beginning to tell truth to power.

Anonymous said...

I think there is even a stronger case against the media, how badly balanced the reporting has been on some candidates prior to the elections.

If William Bailhache is 'crowned' the new Chief Minister, this may lead to a global story when your case is aired in London, the words shafted internationally come to mind and those who prefer to believe such a man rather than you should be shouted down by Frank Walker.

At least one day you will be able to say, I told you so at many of the hustings.

Anonymous said...

Strange logic, Stuart is dammed because he was 'rude' to people and did not play the 'good boy' rules but does not get enough votes, whereas, Bob Hill does it all by the rules and does not get enough votes.

There must have been a lot of work done for Bob to loose out, I guess he will be able to take the gloves off now!!!

Anonymous said...

Frank Walker live on BBC Jersey spouted you might be in with a chance if we where still electing six candidates...

Ian Evans said...

YUP, Bob's been a superstar, but unfortunately too polite for his own good, but not for our's Bob, your a GENTLEMAN :) Best Wishes

Anonymous said...

What's going on in St Clements ? I hear there is some kind of dispute ?

Anonymous said...

Still the biggest five Parishes to give their results.

Web Guru said...

Live: Jersey Election

Ian Evans said...

The Monster's Ball

Anonymous said...

OK so you haven't got into the top 4 so far, but it's not a bad vote of confidence to get as many votes as you have. Besides, it's probably better for you not to be in that pit of toxic malfeasances!

You can still do good work in the courts - whereas Terry Le Main is totally washed up, LOL

And think of it this way - Bailhash has now painted a nice big target on his chest, as a politician now he's fair game to be grilled and held to account.

Interesting times ahead yet!

Zoompad said...

"You lost a lot of support by refusing to do community service"

More likely electoral fraud and skulduggery.

At least Stuart can attend to his own needs a little now, after all the malicious vindictive persecution he has had to endure he could do with recharging his batteries.

None of you trolls can ever close the door he has opened. Stuart has let in some fresh air on the whole toxic political system, and the door will never be able to be closed again.

Stuart was not going bto stand in this election but we his supporters persuaded him to do so, and the corrupt slime did everything they possibly could bar having him assassinated to keep him out.

Ok then,m they got their way. Now lets see how the Bellyaches and their crafty pals enjoy their triumph, not for long, I would reckon, as the whole tax haven systrm is about to come crashing down like a playing card tower!

Anonymous said...

Cohen part of CTV team tonight.Asked why Bob Hill lost out,his reply was to the effect that Bob Hill had not spent enough time dealing with his parish issues and had given to much time involving himself with child abuse and police suspension matters.
Can someone get audio of what he said.Sometime between 10.30 and 12.00

Anonymous said...

As another disappointing election result emmerges,,,,its seems just like all other elections in Jersey.

martin said...

well that,s it im so gutted for stuart and jersey we are going down a very bad road if i could move away from jersey i would

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

If you want comments published here, keep them reasonable and calm, please.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

gutted.
What i fail to grasp as the results come in is how/why the top results are identical in every parish

Anonymous said...

lost the live on line radio link,but thankfully have managed to drag the old medium wave radio out of mothballs

Anonymous said...

It would seem the JEP and local media got their man in.

Frank Walker putting his tuppence in about Stuart just before BBC went off air. Mentions Stuarts court costs A4 print outs photo giggles in background.

Anonymous said...

Stuart

As I am off the island I have not attended any of the senatorial hustings, but I understand you were quite restrained in what you said about Bailhache and co (with one notable exception).

As it looks as if you won't get back in, with the benefit of hindsight do you now wish you had taken a more abrasive approach at the hustings?

Anonymous said...

I'm a St Helier SS voter awaiting St. H. result.

Gutted at the result in other parishes.

A lot of people believe in you and your efforts Stuart - never forget that.

Awaiting the St.Helier result - hopefully the more sensible parish !

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Well, that's no big surprise.

Fiona Spur (BBC Jersey) did use BBC Jersey as a lure to marry into the Frank Walker multi-millionaire dynasty.

What other reason would BBC Jersey have for breaking the broadcasting act - and the BBC Charter - by devoting the Sunday phone-in broadcast entirely - and unchallenged - to Frank Walker - the leader of a political party machine that has organised a slate of candidates across these elections?

And do so on the Sunday before the elections?

The BBC in Jersey is utterly corrupted; it went native a long, long time ago.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

If you click on the BBC link Web Guru posted at 23.58 and then scroll down to the 'Live Text' entry for 22.38 you will see quite an illuminating photo and accompanying caption.

I did not think BBC reporters - even those from BBC Jersey - were supposed do things like that.

At least not in public.

Anonymous said...

2 pm and its all over.
17500 blinkered people out there!

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Well, as I've so often remarked - the government we deserve.

But as I've always said - the real battle is in court - in London.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Stuart.

It is criminal that our only local mewspaper is allowed to publish several letters from the public, calling you a criminal, a cheat and a liar, in the time running up to a General Election.
Then to top it all you make their front page news one week before the General Election when they, [our only local newpaper] call you a disruptive criminal, because you have refused to do your community service.

And yet there is not even a whisper from them when eight potencial Deputies condemn Sir Philip Bailhache as not fit to be in the States, let alone a Senator!?

No doubt you are taking careful note of all the above for future reference?

Anonymous said...

Arab Dawn
Jersey Dusk

Anonymous said...

"Well, as I've so often remarked - the government we deserve."

No Stuart this is not the govermnent I deserve at least. I did not vote for any of these clowns. None of my candidates including you got in. All in all very dissapointing but not what I deserve!

My feeling is that once again the younger members of society have not taken enough interest and the grey army, ultra conservative and largely ignorant of or too lazy to find out the real issues, have dominated. Before anyone shoots me down in flames I know and respect the older members of society that do take an intertest in politics, really do their homework, and like to debate the real political issues with a passion. But in my experience there are too many who just dont and vote with the status quo which in this case means establishment. They also laregly belive everything they read in the RAG and the daily mail.

Thank god Lewis didnt get in though, and Tel boy can go back to kicking dodgy car tyres.

JRCbean.

Anonymous said...

I never thought Stuart would get in. Too many vested interests and many ordinary people think he is a loony and waster of tax payers money, due to propaganda by the local media. Very annoyed Baker got in my district, at least his girlfriend Hedi Green failed. Some small ray of light.

Zoompad said...

"Well, as I've so often remarked - the government we deserve."

I don't think you should assume that there was no electoral fraud.

Anonymous said...

Stuart, all I can say is GOD HELP US !

Anonymous said...

Out of all of those who voted, 80% voted for Bailhache. - Ever thought that you might be wrong Stuart? (Of course you won't publish this)

Anonymous said...

So we know who the next Chief Miniature will be!

Bailhache stood on a platform of reforming the States to something more effective, so the poll topping result is good in a way that it confirms that people aren't happy with the quality of government. That's loud and clear. It's just a pity that they don't seem to realise that the issues he complains about (the opposition actually trying to achieve something) are the necessary cut and thrust of politics - actually fighting for truth and openess rather than cover-up consensus and toeing the line that he craves.

The mix of establishment/non-establishment in various areas confirms my belief that it's all about -
* How well known your name is
* How 'polite' you seem
* Who you know
* How much you spend on adverts
* How well the establishment media treat you

It's not sour grapes to say I'm genuinely convinced that your 6402 voters are far more aware of the real issues, whereas Sir Fill's 17538 are far more likely to be blissfully unaware of his ways, covering up child abuse.

Consider the alternatives -
a) 17500 islanders like child abuse cover-ups and Jersey is the least safe place in the world for children as far as voter opinion is concerned.
- or -
b) 17500 islanders believed all the Old Boys' Net spin and don't really understand.

I prefer to think it's b - Incompetence is more likely than Malevolence!

Anonymous said...

Good news at least - M "No shelter in MY village" Holland Prior and O'Queef-Burger failed to make it!

Anonymous said...

So we've swapped Cohen for Lyndon F, which probably won't make much difference to anything, but it's nice to have the Planning Disaster removed.

Bailhache in - Le Main out -? Again, things remain pretty much as bad as ever but not much worse!

Anonymous said...

I wonder if http://www.thisisjersey.com/comment/you-say/ will now magically work again, now the election is over?

If not, they've ruined an active forum which had the most online activity.

Anonymous said...

Something smells fishy - I can't find a percentage turnout figure anywhere for the Senatorials.

PB's 17538 was apparently 80.2% of the vote (source - BBC), which works out to a turnout of 21868 votes - making that just 35.3% of the possible 61,987 (source - CTV) registered voters.

Yet, also according to the BBC, the average turnout for Constable is 48.6% and for Deputies it is 47.9%

Why would 48% of people vote for constables and deputies but so many of them not bother to vote for the Senators? Have voting slips fallen through cracks in the floor to be collected up by the tooth fairy? Your following was markedly different in St.Helier!

Anonymous said...

What on earth has Bailhache got that so many feudal loving sheep voted for him?

Must be a nice bloke because he was Bailiff?

"Bless the squire and his relations and keep us in our proper station".

Tough luck, though on all those who were convinced that you, Stuart, would be humiliated.

Anonymous said...

Really gutted for Mark. Performed well at both hustings I saw. An excellent manifesto leaflet. Gave us political and economic analysis of why were are here and what to do. The island will regret ignoring him.

voiceforchildren said...

Stuart.

The State Media have spoken.

Zoompad said...

Right everyone, thats enough moaning. As Anon pointed out, something is not right. This needs investigating further, no time to waste moaning when it could be time spent investigating election fraud.

"Something smells fishy - I can't find a percentage turnout figure anywhere for the Senatorials.

PB's 17538 was apparently 80.2% of the vote (source - BBC), which works out to a turnout of 21868 votes - making that just 35.3% of the possible 61,987 (source - CTV) registered voters.

Yet, also according to the BBC, the average turnout for Constable is 48.6% and for Deputies it is 47.9%

Why would 48% of people vote for constables and deputies but so many of them not bother to vote for the Senators? Have voting slips fallen through cracks in the floor to be collected up by the tooth fairy? Your following was markedly different in St.Helier!"

ONWARDS AND UPWARDS

Zoompad said...

Who is the admin of the election services in Jersey? There must be some paperwork on this important official function.

Nick Palmer said...

Anonymous wrote "So we've swapped Cohen for Lyndon F, which probably won't make much difference to anything, but it's nice to have the Planning Disaster removed"

Not so. Farnham is probably just another Ozoufite. No doubt sincere in his beliefs but barking up completely up the wrong tree if the really serious issues are to be addressed.

He is one of those who appeared to completely misunderstand the question I posed at St Lawrence's hustings about the true economic/environmental situation we face - Sir Philip was another.

Freddie Cohen was on the verge of "getting it", indeed it is possible that he actually does "get it" but has just been keeping his knowledg under his hat to keep in with the political in crowd.

Cohen would have been far far better for us all than Farnham and it annoys me about the Jersey electorate that they focus so much tunnel vision on single issues like Portelet and ignore everything else that greatly outweigh them.

I'm not saying that ex-Senator Cohen was a saint, just saying that the electorate have favoured a less good candidate.

Of course, Senator Farnham could surprise us all, but don't hold your breath.

Anonymous said...

I cannot understand that so many islanders gave their votes to Philip Bailhache..... It looks like going one big step BACKWARDS !I hoped so much,that YOU , STUART,would become SENATOR again!!Your speaches have been brilliant and very clear to understand.On your blog here you offered people to ask you questions.
But 17500 voters didn`t value that.I also wished that together with you, STUART,-,LINDA CORBY and Dr.MARK FORSKITT would become SENATORS.

Anonymous said...

''The battle is in the court in London''

Do you have faith they will view your evidence and act or simply ignore it as they do here.

Anonymous said...

BBC RADIO JERSEY

THE HEART OF RIGHT WING LIFE

BARRA, WALKER, HENWOOD, OZOUF, SHENTON

BRECKON?

THE SHOW WAS SIMPLY AWFUL.

THIS WAS A REAL SHME BECAUSE THE 2008 SHOW WAS REALLY GOOD.

Anonymous said...

So gutted with the result I feel physically sick.

Glad Sadie Rennard and Jeremy Macon got in here though, the criminal thing is that out of an estate of 24 houses, only 2 of us even bothered to get on the electoral role to vote.

This is where we let ourselves down, because those people, had they bothered to vote, aren't the sort to vote for establishment big-wigs, they are for the working man.

The trouble is, it's the rich establishment types who make the effort to vote.

So people you didn't make the effort!
After all the effort and example Stuart and the other wonderful bloggers have made and shown you, you couldn't be bothered to support them, get on the electoral register and go and vote, one day, that's all it would have taken.

Serves you right, don't moan to me when you get what you deserve, the 'elite' getting richer, and you getting poorer, and no justice for you either.

Pat yourselves on the back!

Thank you Stuart and fellow bloggers for the 'heart and soul' you have put into trying to help those who obviously can't help themselves, they know not what they do.

LA

Sandy said...

"After all the effort and example Stuart and the other wonderful bloggers have made"

It has been a great effort, yours especially, Stuart, but I think we have to recognise that the blogosphere has proved marginal, at best, in the electoral process. Many people did graze across this and other sites, but it made precious little difference in the end.

So often, it is bloggers who blog about other blogs, a closed circle.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous says, 17500 voted baillache, why? well the truth is that these voters have not had access to Stuarts Blog, either they have no access to the internet or like my wife and our two best friends have not bothered to read Stuarts blog and as I have told them (and caught it in the neck for doing so) they have prefered being fed Sh-t by the local rag or daily liar as I call it. and now words of truth from Cohen on the radio this am I shall miss not being Foreign Minister,.... As I have said before on this blog thats the only reason he tried again when he realized he would loose that cosy job,I hope thats the last we hear of him but he could return with heavy involvement in the building trade watch this space, Finally, Stuart sorry for all our sakes that you did not come in but your still a winner as far as Im concerned.

Nick Palmer said...

anon wrote

Why would 48% of people vote for constables and deputies but so many of them not bother to vote for the Senators?

A partial explanation is that there were lower turnouts in the urban parishes (which have a bigger electorate than the rural parishes) some of which had no constable election and anon has just taken a simple average for the whole Island. However, assuming Radio Jersey's election results map is accurate we have the Parish percentages voting for Sir Philip for Senator as follows:

St Ouen 1151 68%
St Mary 513 73%
St Peter 1100 63%
St Brelade 2320 63%
St Lawrence 1251 70%
St John 821 71%
Trinity 813 75%
St Martin 1191 72%
Grouville 1439 75%
St Clement 1680 65%
St Saviour 1981 59%
St Helier 3278 48%

Total 17538 80.2%??

Trinity and Grouville tie for the highest percentage voting for Sir Philip (75%) but my mathematical mind doesn't yet see how all those lower parish percentages add up to an all Island total of 80.2% unless I've made a mistake.

Web Guru said...

Full election results as they happened

Anonymous said...

Montford Tadier did accuse Walker on live radio last night of supporting certain candidates.Walker denied,but as its not illegal why should Montfort be so unhappy?

Anonymous said...

Why would 48% of people vote for constables and deputies but so many of them not bother to vote for the Senators?

Election fraud, Simples

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

You're quite right - organising and supporting a slate of candidates is not illegal.

Why Montfort is unhappy because - once again - the Jersey voting public have been conned by the Jersey Establishment Party - because that party is not honest, and denies its existence.

Most people voting will have believed they were voting for independent candidates, whereas, in truth, most of those elected are not.

They've had the covert support of the entire Jersey oligarchy machine behind them - including all of the corrupted mainstream media.

For example - consider the breathtaking corruption - the naked tramplings of the Broadcasting Act - of OFCOM regulation - of the Representation of the Peoples Act - and of the BBC Charter - in having Frank Walker as studio guest for hours on the Sunday morning - before the election.

Even though it was already a matter of public record that he was running a slate of candidates.

And - they had him on without any balancing counter-view.

This is what we mean about the extraordinary corruption - the "capture" - of the BBC in Jersey.

It's not as though the facts were disputable; their conduct is just there, to be seen.

There were a number of very good candidates in this election; people who would have striven to clean-up Jersey's public administration.

Unfortunately for most of them - their opponents in this election were CTV, the JEP and the BBC in Jersey.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Trinity and Grouville tie for the highest percentage voting for Sir Philip (75%) but my mathematical mind doesn't yet see how all those lower parish percentages add up to an all Island total of 80.2% unless I've made a mistake.

Thursday, 20 October 2011 14:06:00 GMT+01:00



Simplistically, take the total and divide by twelve to get 67% average,BUT doubtless its not that simple.In fact its not.Just tried it out with three parishes.

Anonymous said...

Surely the votes should be graded, such as:-

1st vote = 20 points
2nd vote = 15 points
3rd vote = 10 points
4th vote = 5 points

Whereby, if you only vote for 2:
1st vote = 30 points
2nd vote = 20 points

Or:

1st vote = 23 points
2nd vote = 17 points
3rd vote = 11 points



On roughly the above basis it is possible that Bailhache may have been lower.

Anonymous said...

For example - consider the breathtaking corruption - the naked tramplings of the Broadcasting Act - of OFCOM regulation - of the Representation of the Peoples Act - and of the BBC Charter - in having Frank Walker as studio guest for hours on the Sunday morning - before the election.

Even though it was already a matter of public record that he was running a slate of candidates.


Oh come on Stuart,as much as i am a supporter of you,is there any proof that Walker was plugging his favoured candidates,on live radio last night,before the polls closed

Anonymous said...

Stuart -You are hero.I remember how the rag tried to destroy the late Norman Le Brocq.Keep the faith.You have many friends out there ..home and abroad.

Anonymous said...

And what about that BBC reporter who was pictured wearing a Lyndon Farnham face mask last night? Not very professional to say the least.

Anonymous said...

Having an ex politician as a guest when polls are closed does not contravene BBC rules.

Please stop making things up just because you were whipped!

Anonymous said...

I'm a regular reader of most of the local blogs and I am most grateful to many contributors for putting information into the public domain that the other media are clearly suppressing.

However, I do wish that those who keep on about rigging the vote counting would take the trouble to learn more about the process before jumping to conclusions. I was one of very many ordinary people who spend about 16 hours yesterday helping with the voting and counting at the parish hall. My fellow helpers came from all walks of life and had a variety of views on local politics and politicians.

As far as I could see, there was no opportunity to engage in nefarious deeds. But, more importantly perhaps, there was no such evil intent within the hearts and minds of those volunteers. We were simply there to help with the democratic process.

The simple fact is that the voting patterns seem to have been much the same in all the parishes. The wishes of those who took the trouble to vote have been filled.

Did the media play a significant role in the outcome of the election? Yes.

Was the reporting by the media biased? Yes.

Was there apathy amongst the electorate? Yes

We should face up to the real reasons why the "establishment" candidates did so well and not waste time on excuses like vote-rigging.

James said...

Stuart et al,

BBC are currently running a consultation on local radio service - form is here . Question 3 is very, very relevant to Sunday morning.

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

A reader says:

"Oh come on Stuart,as much as i am a supporter of you,is there any proof that Walker was plugging his favoured candidates,on live radio last night,before the polls closed."

And another reader says:

"Having an ex politician as a guest when polls are closed does not contravene BBC rules."

Both observations are deliberately missing the point.

The unlawful degree of bias exhibited by the BBC in Jersey was made clear by the appearance of Frank Walker - twice in a matter of days - in lengthy studio appearances on BBC radio - with no credible, balancing counter-opinion.

That's a criticisms that is valid - and would be at any time it occurred - quite regardless of the election.

Likewise - BBC Jersey airwaves were packed solid with right-wingers, and Jersey establishment people all night long. A brief appearance for one, 'token' 'left-winger' - in Alan Breckon - who is, in any event, non-credible and inarticulate.

The demonstration of bias throughout the coverage last night was jaw-dropping. The point is not that that influenced the election - as most of it was after the polls had closed; rather - the point is that the use of wall-to-wall conservative opinion shows the bias of BBC Jersey.

However - the far, far more serious issue - is the unopposed - party-political - appearance of Frank Walker as a studio guest - for hours of live radio - on the BBC - two days before the election.

It is corruption.

Plain and simple.

Imagine a UK general election - and two days before, the BBC gave hours of unbalanced, live, national radio airtime - to a senior figure from one of the parties - in which he was given free reign to speak about all the alleged failings of the other parties and their leading figures?

If that happened - the Director General of the BBC would be fired - immediately - and, indeed, the entire status of the BBC would be jeopardized. There would certainly be a major public inquiry into such naked political bias and influence upon a general election.

But that kind of overt political bias is what the BBC have just done in Jersey.

We're going to complain to London.

Jon Gripton should be immediately sacked for this.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

If I hear one more person, who says to me, "see, it makes no difference that I didn't vote", nothing is going to change. It's the same old thing again. How hard does it need to get that the pound in your pocket is so weak that you need to vote.

Anonymous said...

Both observations are deliberately missing the point.
Easy Stuart,I cant speak for the other person,but it certainly wasn't deliberate on my part.

But that kind of overt political bias is what the BBC have just done in Jersey.

We're going to complain to London.

Jon Gripton should be immediately sacked for this.


I hope you succeed.

Listened to tonights Channel Report and was puzzled by a reporters comment with reference to P.Bailhache when he takes up his new roll.
"He will no longer be covered by parliamentary privilege"

Am i mistaken in thinking that the opposite is correct?

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

To new readers - who may have voted for Philip Bailhache - or who might now be very worried about just were Jersey is heading with Phil Bailhache as Chief Minister, and his brother, William Bailhache as Bailiff - I suggest you read my recent description of the history and conduct of Philip Bailhache.

Here's the link:

Philip Bailhache

The kind of factual history, that you'll never learn from Jersey's mainstream media.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Its not only the local BBC that is politically bias.

Does anyone care to count the number of letters to the editor published in the JEP over the last month, that rubbished Stuart Syvret, even last nights edition (election day) had a letter slamming him.

This aswell as the BBC bias should be taken further!

Anonymous said...

If I hear one more person, who says to me, "see, it makes no difference that I didn't vote", nothing is going to change. It's the same old thing again. How hard does it need to get that the pound in your pocket is so weak that you need to vote.

Thursday, 20 October 2011 18:51:00 GMT+01:00

Had the whole electorate voted,I doubt that it would have affected the result,as i cant reason why their opinions should be any different to those that did vote.
I am still baffled as to why people voted as they did.
What was it about P.Bailhache that attracted so much interest.
Its not that his policies were dramatically different.
Was it his demeanour?
Did he get more publicity than others?
It was pointed out that he used black and white election posters.
Whatever it is,it certainly would be worth finding out and putting to use at the next election.

Anonymous said...

"Sandy said...

"After all the effort and example Stuart and the other wonderful bloggers have made"

It has been a great effort, yours especially, Stuart, but I think we have to recognise that the blogosphere has proved marginal, at best, in the electoral process. Many people did graze across this and other sites, but it made precious little difference in the end. "


You know why that was, Sandy? Because there was NO unified focus across the local blogging community.

Had the local political blogs made a concerted effort to shout from the same page in the month leading up to the elections, it could very well have made a difference.

On an island this size where a political seat can be gained with a few hundred votes, the Internet holds huge potential to directly influence a candidate's vote total. Quite simply, that potential has not yet been properly tapped.

Hopefully this will have changed come 2014.

Anonymous said...

I'm still baffled by the turnout figures, and the supposed 80% for PB, which the States Media love to crow about.

So, what was the percentage of the vote for poll topping Vernon in 93
and for yours with 15,212 in 99?

They also go on about there being more registered voters than ever (not surprising considering how the population is swelling for lack of decent immigration policy and disastrous pursuit of unsustainable growth)
- so I wonder if the percentage vote is actually better for PB than yours or Vernons, rather than only looking at absolute numbers?

Not really important I suppose, but interesting to a stats geek!

Anonymous said...

Stuart, the saying goes the higher they climb the further they have to fall.

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

a reader says:

"Its not only the local BBC that is politically biased.

Does anyone care to count the number of letters to the editor published in the JEP over the last month, that rubbished Stuart Syvret, even last nights edition (election day) had a letter slamming him.

This as-well as the BBC bias should be taken further!"

Yes - whilst it is true the Jersey Evening Post is just an overt propaganda rag owned by the local oligarchy - newspapers are allowed to be biased.

Broadcast media are not.

Especially the BBC which is bound by a public service Charter - for which it gets funded by the TV Licence fee.

When broadcast media fail to exhibit balance - they are breaking the law.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Bailhache /Ozouf/ Le Marquand isn't it great that democracy is all about choice.The sort of choice given to Gaddafi as in ' Please come out of that drainage pipe'.

Well you could always blame the JEP but ,oh dear! the Minister for Foreign Affairs has just done that.

At this point Terry Le Main packs his cases to go on a 'well deserved' holiday with his wife.
'Mr.Le Main , why are you holding all your clothes when you have a large suitcase as well?

What's the betting that a house will be for sale in St.Clements soon to pay for 'some incidentals' in the Spanish house.
To some , all of their Christmases (sic) come at once.


Seriously, a consistent 7th place is in my view a remarkable and credible position given the scale of opposition. 80% of voters make the Stepford wives, look perceptive.

Anonymous said...

If you think the bbc are unfair then all voters who are not happy with it withhold my licence fee.

Anonymous said...

the BBC have been breaching their charter for years by accepting money from the EU

Anonymous said...

It was the JEP that done it they won it, not Bailhache

Anonymous said...

If the BBC are not acting in way the licence payers would like then all those who think they are bias should write to the BBC to complain or setup a complaint with the MP's and if you get 100,000 people to sign it then they have to listen.

Anonymous said...

Stuart, I have a question about the reduction of 6 senatorial seats to 4.

Am I correct in thinking that, had there been 6 seats then we would all have had 6 votes last night, not 4?

It is an important question because the media are putting out the line "Had there been 6 seats, then Colley and Cohen would have got in".

But that's not necessarily true, is it? It naively assumes that everyone would have used their fifth and sixth votes for Colley and Cohen. Which is complete speculation. Many people may have used votes 5 and 6 for Syvret and Forskitt, making it a four horse race for positions 5 and 6.

I raise this point because I don't want a myth to gain credibility that "Freddie was cheated because of the reduction in seats". He might have been, he might not. Nobody will ever know. It is complete speculation.

For the local media to naively assume that the top six would have been the same top six if we all had six votes...well, it tells you all you need to know. They just don't think.

I speculate that a great number of people would have voted for last night's top 4 because those candidates seem to offer security, stability and a modicum of intelligence. The same voters may well have given you their 5th or 6th vote for your ability to rock the boat, but they put their own needs first.

What are your thoughts? Am I right about the 6 votes? What happened in previous senatorials?

Anonymous said...

Stuart, take heart and don't give up. In last years by-election you received just under 3500 votes. This year you received just under 6500 votes which, given the negative shite from MSM against you, this is pretty damn good going in my books!!

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

I'm through with Jersey electoral politics.

Now, our focus and energy must be on the class-action against the UK Justice Secretary.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

The editorial in tonight's rag on our new feudal lord could have been written by "Proud Jerseyman".

Either Bright and Shipley have an exquisite sense of irony or things are even worse than we can imagine. I suspect it's the latter,

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Bright and Shipley - and, of course - John Averty.

We mustn't forget John.

Stuart

Larry David said...

If we are brutally honest there has been no gain for the progresive cause this time round.

The establishment have for centuries worked well as a team in ensuring political and economic control.

What to us look like arcane civic society groups based around common socio-ecomonic values are actually highly evolved political organs that are quick and easy to mobilise. The effect is devastating come election time.

All individuals, groups and politicians who share progressive values need to consider how in the future they can work as an effective team. Its not hard to do. If you have no idea ask a neighbor who voted for Bailhache. They will even tell you how its done.

Elected politicians, unions, campaign groups, bloggers and interested individuals with a vision for a better society should consider an open forum.

Anonymous said...

Isn't saying "you get the government you deserve" a bit arrogant? Like saying "democracy is rubbish unless I get elected"? You get the government you elect. That is democracy. Insulting the people who do not vote for you is no way to win them over.

If I can offer some advice: stop the "I'm a victim of a conspiracy" stuff, it turns people off because it is self-obsessed not public-focused. Get back to campaigning on things people can believe in and get inspired by. Your election day mini manifesto post was inspiring. But you will never regain popular trust while you appear to be focused solely on a crusade to avoid the legal consequences of your actions.

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

A reader says:

"Its not hard to do."

Yes - it is.

Take my word for it.

The progressive side is cursed with defective, unprincipled and inadequate individuals - who hardly need the encouragement and manipulation they get to sabotage our efforts from within.

The Jersey oligarchs have many "useful idiots" in the progressive camp - not to mention some outright "owned" gangsters like Geoff Southern, Judy Martin and Alan Breckon.

I'm sorry - but not only is it hard to do - it is, actually, impossible.

I mean that: impossible.

Just consider the local msm.

There has been zero fair or reasonable coverage to the progressive cause. None at all.

On the contrary. The local msm has done all it can - it has striven - to support the local gangster-oligarchy.

Even the BBC. Witness their Frank Walker party-political broadcast last Sunday.

And - remember - the BBC were given the 94 page statement by the former Chief of Police Graham Power; given it weeks ago.

An profound and serious public interest document; evidence of the most dramatic gravity. For any real journalist - it would have been like all your Christmases had come at once; makes Watergate look fairly straightforward and tame.

What did the BBC do with it?

Buried it.

So that's why I suggest you are living in a dream-world - when you say "it's not hard to do"; it is. It's impossible to do.

Functional, democratic, electoral politics is simply not possible in an environment with such captured and corrupted media.

No - it's the legal actions against the UK Justice Secretary which will clean this place up.

Hell - the vast accumulation of evidence is apocalyptic enough. I think even the London-based judicial mates of the Bailhache Brothers, Birt and Le Cocq are going to find it somewhat difficult to dodge around this time.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

http://stuartsyvret.blogspot.com/2011/10/philip-bailhache.html

I read the above post and see no conspiracy simply this is wrong. Carry on as you are Stuart.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous at 09:57:00 Thursday, 20 October 2011 said...

I wonder if http://www.thisisjersey.com/comment/you-say/ will now magically work again, now the election is over?

If not, they've ruined an active forum which had the most online activity.

It's even worse now, I'm afraid, they've now gone "Twitter" as well.

God help us!


'You say' Regular.

Zoompad said...

I just want to urge all the survivors of the abuse at Haut de la Garenne, and anyone who is supporting them to write to Ken Clark.

I have a gut feeling that he is a very different sort of man from Jack Straw. I think Ken Clark is essentially a decent man who is in danger of being manipulated and coerced into doing indecent things by the wicked people who are leaning on him. I know the BFMS and FACT groups have been encouraging their members to lean on him. Paedophiles are very clever - I never underestimate their craftiness, and they are especially good at leading well intentioned people by the nose.

But I do urge people to write to him, and tell him what you have been through, and how you feel. Send a copy of the letter to your own MP as well.

Anonymous said...

Stu, I know your opinion on politeness. However, it is refreshing to see Jeremy Macon’s posters emblazoned with Thank You . That lad will go far if he keeps his feet on the ground and continues to serve his parish well,

Anonymous said...

Any idea who this Richard Syvret is?
He is sending out religious proberganda by email.

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Yes, Jeremy Macon is a good kid. He's been a good States member, and I've no doubt he'll continue to be.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Yes, Jeremy Macon is a good kid. He's been a good States member, and I've no doubt he'll continue to

I note that both Jeremy Macon and Sadie Rennard have left some campaign
posters on display.
Not complaining,as those i have seen at the top of Les Varines have THANK YOU stickers across them...nice touch

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Just a brief advance notice.

Some time soon, the legal battle against the UK Justice Secretary is going to commence.

Whilst I have two or three more evidenced submissions (in addition to those recently made) to make to that Office, which I'm in the process of doing over the next couple of days - the customary dismissal should be received reasonably soon.

The only decision we still need to make is whether I take the action as sole claimant, or we do it as a class-action.

Either way - it may be necessary to mount a fundraising campaign - asking supporters for donations - so that the basic costs of flights to London, hotel stays etc - for the initial application, then series of appeals - can be met.

Watch this space for details.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Fundraising:
send details of a bank account or someone to collect & will spare what I can for your campaign its about time you were supported ala Norman Le Brocq x amount regularly to provide some income.

ALAN DROWN said...

Dear SS

The voting public have spoken and just because it didn't go your way you believe everone and everything must be corrupt.

I think you should get on with your community service and give something back to the Island that you took by spending 6 months out of the Island.

I then suggest you receive anger management counselling as clearly the strain of things has got to you.

I know you won't print this as it is not a view held by your acolytes but this is my advice.

Anonymous said...

As you so often & rightly point out the system in Jersey is corrupt.
A further example is in the local media today. Headline news is that inflation is soaring and the jobless total still rising.
Both figures either witheld by civil servants or the media until the day after the elections so that the previous incumbents in the States did not have their election chances adversely affected.
This sort of things happens after every election.
Anyway Stuart I think you did pretty well - it's awfully difficult to fight "City Hall" anywhere and nigh impossible in Jersey.

Anonymous said...

It looks like those of us from beyond Jersey's shores who have wondered how to make our support for Stuart more tangible will soon have an opportunity. Make your support count - give generously to his campaign fund! This is for the Jersey abuse survivors and for justice and accountable government.

Anonymous said...

Hi Stuart,
I'm glad you've decided to request financial support with yoru important work. No doubt the other side will seek political capital on this move but too bad.
What you're doing is vital and I'm happy to pay a regular small sum (sorry can't be more) until the day comes. If 500 people join me on £2 p/week,thats £52,000PA.
Obama did well this way. Hope you do too.

Anonymous said...

I look forward to joining with other progressives.

I think Daniel Wimberley's doing a good job. His website whichwayshallivote provides key information and reveals what is really going on in the States.

http://whichwayshallivote.wordpress.com/

I hope people who are anti-establishment will get together soon, take a longer collective view and start to plan events. The tide will turn.

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

A reader says:

"I think you should get on with your community service and give something back to the Island that you took by spending 6 months out of the Island."

Anther victim of Jersey's media, who just doesn't know why I had to leave Jersey.

1: After three months work on my defense case, by an expert witness and myself - my defence was submitted to the court and the prosecution in October 2009.

Three days later - and without any warning, the prosecution said they had now decided the entire defense case was "not relevant" - and they wanted it deemed "inadmissible".

And Bidget Shaw agreed with them.

The establishment did this - because they read the defence case - and realised to their horror, they simply had no answer to it - and the prosecution had collapsed.

Hence the sudden moving of the goal-posts.

(But you can now read my expert witness reports, across three postings - 29th August and 13th & 19th September)

I knew then I had zero chance of ever getting a fair trial in Jersey, so went to London in an attempt to get specialist legal advice. (Which didn't work out because the conditional fee system wouldn't cover Jersey cases.)

2: Exposing child-abuse cover-ups. I had to obtain evidence - and publish that evidence - outside the jurisdiction of Jersey; evidence showing the disgusting and repeated failure by Jersey's authorities to hold Jane and Alan Maguire to account for their appalling abuse of children in the States Blanche Pierre Group-Home.

The sources wouldn't give me the evidence in Jersey - and I couldn't have published the evidence from Jersey - without being subjected to another illegal massed-police raid, search without a search-warrant and corrupt, politicised malicious prosecution.

By going to London - I became free to do that work; to properly represent my constituents who had been abused and utterly betrayed by the States of Jersey.

That evidence can be read in a series of blog-postings I did from exile, titled, "Blanche Pierre: The Anatomy of an On-going Atrocity". That series can be read in my archive; it begins on 6th April 2010.

That's why I went to London.

To try and expose the fact that my vulnerable constituents had not been protected by the Jersey authorities from the likes of nurse M.

And to uncover and expose the truth of how the entire apparatus of the States of Jersey had covered-up the crimes committed against the children in the Blanche Pierre home.

Unforgivable of me, obviously.

The government you deserve.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

I will also be happy to give financial help for your legal battles.
It needs to be made clear, as inevitably some will misunderstand,what exactly the fund is for.
I assume that it will be set up in a way that Jerseys authorities will be unable to touch the account under any pretence

Anonymous said...

Re. Jeremy Macon's and Sadie Rennard's thank you posters

I noted with interest that election posters had, with one notable exception, started introducing the word 'Please'.

Being a cynic I read this as meaning 'Pleeeeze, pleeeze, vote for me, How will I manage on ordinary wages?'.

Probably because his were among the first posters to be published and the poor bloke wasn't to know that everyone else was going to say 'Please vote for...', the conspicuous exception was Ted Vibert.

Looks like his saving at the printers cost him in the long run.

R. B. B.

Anonymous said...

Postings at 14-15 & 17-17.

I'm in total agreement, and about time to.

Set up a paying in account and leave the rest to your faithfull followers....

Here and around the World

Anonymous said...

I am more than happy to pay a donation for you to go ahead with your important work. Please set up an account.

ahimsa

Anonymous said...

"Either way - it may be necessary to mount a fundraising campaign - asking supporters for donations - so that the basic costs of flights to London, hotel stays etc - for the initial application, then series of appeals - can be met..."

I'd be quite happy to give you some money but on one condition: You stop using the phrase "The government you deserve". No-one who reads this blog and who supports you deserves the current Island government. Nor, for that matter, do many of the Island's ordinary workers, immigrants or elderly.

Anonymous said...

you know a bit about data protection stuart, should a candidate have been given copies of the electoral role to work with before they had beenn nominated?

Anonymous said...

Stuart's phrase "The government you deserve" is uncomfortable for many, me included, for in an important way, he's right.

Many of us have not made ourselves known. We post under Anonymous or pen names because we are, perhaps rightly, concerned about the consequences if we are known to be against the establishment. We have lives to fund, responsibilities to families and we can't or won't take the risk to stand up.

In this way, we are complicit because we have not fully participated in what should be the democratic process of debate and holding those in power to account.

We stand at the edges and feel good that we support the right side. And what do we get for our lack of courage and our complicity? The government we deserve.

Anonymous said...

I was amused by Philip Bailhache's opening statement at the St John hustings. He said, if I remember correctly, that he had spent all his working life in an environment where truthfulness is fundamental.

If he is referring to the practice of law in the courts then all the swearing and affirming to tell the truth does not add up to much.

Advocates know that, and connive at it. They know that prosecutions of perjury rarely happen, partly because of the difficulty of proving it, and partly because fundamentally a court hearing is a battle not a striving for truth. So they don't care.

Bailhache was dissembling.

Zoompad said...

"I'd be quite happy to give you some money but on one condition: You stop using the phrase "The government you deserve". No-one who reads this blog and who supports you deserves the current Island government. Nor, for that matter, do many of the Island's ordinary workers, immigrants or elderly."

ABSOLUTLY!!!!

Ian Evans said...

"...the tapestry is mute, so are we-
as long as we are held immobile by the tightly woven threads of fear..."

Anonymous said...

Our inflation rate now 5.4% way ahead of Guernsey's. Food up 8%, heating oil up hugely too.

GST will increase too. Yet again the poorest in our society pick up the tab. Shockingly economic policy did not feature in the election!

Do Bailhache, Farnham etc even have an economic policy?

Anonymous said...

Stuart's phrase "The government you deserve" is uncomfortable for many, me included, for in an important way, he's right.

Many of us have not made ourselves known. We post under Anonymous or pen names because we are, perhaps rightly, concerned about the consequences if we are known to be against the establishment. We have lives to fund, responsibilities to families and we can't or won't take the risk to stand up.

In this way, we are complicit because we have not fully participated in what should be the democratic process of debate and holding those in power to account.

We stand at the edges and feel good that we support the right side. And what do we get for our lack of courage and our complicity? The government we deserve.

I thought i would re-post this because it it one of the most important things i have read about voting. I pig sick ogf people sayiny " It's pointless voting when we never get anywhere, so i don't bother." Then they ramble on about how things are wrong and if this and if that, all the while they sit on the fence and dont vote.

You get the government you deserve is quite appt and i think stuart uses the words well and for a very good reason.

Anonymous said...

Stuart.

You have got to agree that now was not the time for you to get back into politics.

For a start you are back in court next Tuesday and no doubt future court hearings here and in London would have clashed with future States sittings if you had gained a seat.

Could you imagine the ammunition this would have given the local media and establishment, to feed the blinkered public?!

Anonymous said...

ref unon poster -22 October 2011 12:51:00 GMT+01:00

imho, Now is not the time to break cover. soon hopefully.

When this politician's honeymoon period is over perhaps you will be flat on your backs forever

Sir Phil :"Fines for impoliteness in the house"
honeymoon period over soon ? - predict some good people in the house objecting

Hedinda Sands x

Anonymous said...

UNRULY POLITICIANS "SHOULD BE FINED" (JEP, Sat 22 Oct)

Politicians who insult and abuse each other should have their pay docked, according to Senator-elect Sir Philip Bailhache. The former Bailiff says that drastic action is needed to improve the way that States Members do their job.

And he says that the existing code of conduct, which requires politicians to treat 'other Members of the States, officers and members of the public with respect and courtesy and without malice' needs to be properly enforced.

Anonymous said...

What a sad establishment looser candidate Dominic Jones in Grouville is. Take a look at "his supporter's" comments on this is jersey.

He imagines that he was the best candidate, not only in his deputy's election but also in the Senatorial's.because he is a businessman (whatever that means) and a lawyer.

Having had the misfortune to work with the guy in one part of his very checkered professional life, I can confirm with some authority he is a disaster zone. Ask yourselves a simple question, why is a lawyer sitting in the HR department of a catering firm?

Bad luck Stuart, I'm not a natural supporter of yours, but at least you are honest.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Bailhache lies is lies no matter how politely spoken.

Anonymous said...

UNRULY POLITICIANS "SHOULD BE FINED" (JEP, Sat 22 Oct)

They also should not employ known paedophiles as policemen.

Anonymous said...

Stuart, if you've not received a ticket to the launch of Rainbow Warrior 3, I'd like to give you mine. Its on 12th /13th Nov in London, RSVP by 29th Oct. Please indicate if you'd like to go. I have commitments but happy to pay your flight as I think you could do with a break. Maybe you could also combine it with other purposes?

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Rainbow Warrior III, that sounds like a great event, thank you. If you would care to e-mail, we could speak.

st.syvret@gmail.com

Strangely enough - I went to the London inauguration of Rainbow Warrior II.

I did wonder often - back in those days - whether I'd have been better off getting fully involved in Greenpeace, instead of politics.

Stuart

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

A reader says:

"UNRULY POLITICIANS "SHOULD BE FINED" (JEP, Sat 22 Oct)

They also should not employ known paedophiles as policemen."

What an accurate comment.

Stuart

rico sorda said...

"And he says that the existing code of conduct, which requires politicians to treat 'other Members of the States, officers and members of the public with respect and courtesy and without malice' needs to be properly enforced."

What's the point as El Tel Boy didn't get elected lol

Bailhache is back for one simple reason... OZOUF...

People have been reading it wrong if they think PB has come back to clamp down on lefties. PB is back to rain in our power hungry treasury minister. With the backing of the local rag the whole power base has shifted towards PB. He was never going to say that during the election and was quite happy for people to believe what may.

I could have this wrong

But I believe i'm right

rs

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Philip Bailhache goes public on his plan to clamp-down on the free-speech of the public (which is what clamping-down on the free-speech of your elected representatives amounts to).

Great, isn't it?

Even I thought he'd try and keep his more insane tendencies hidden - for the first few months, at least.

But no - it's straight into Britain's feudal fascist demagogue mode - before he's even sworn-in.

If this is what he's like now - just imagine how your legislature - and your freedoms - are going to be after a few months - with Phillip Bailhache as Chief Minister and William Bailhache as Deputy Bailiff or Bailiff?

You were warned.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

If this is what he's like now - just imagine how your legislature - and your freedoms - are going to be after a few months - with Phillip Bailhache as Chief Minister and William Bailhache as Deputy Bailiff or Bailiff?

You can't go wrong really! Phillip Bailhache as Chief Minister and William Bailhache as Deputy Bailiff.

They are doomed to repeat all the former mistakes and corruption that they never learned from and in today's world where secrets are spilling out from every civil servant who has lost their jobs or have been threatened with the sack.

So the civil service need to be careful who they sack.

Ian Evans said...

AND SO THE BULLYING BEGINS!

Anonymous said...

Sir Philip Bailhache is now well and truely in the spotlight.

He has a hell of a lot to prove and live up to in the next three years.

Give him a chance....

But don't hold your breath.

Anonymous said...

A legal requirement of elected representatives to be deferential to other elected political representatives, is more than a limit on free speech. It's likely to result in a systematic reduction of checks and balances, and will surely be used as a weapon against only those PB opposes. What hope can there be for meaningful scrutiny?

Elle

Anonymous said...

I found this comment left under the 'Unruly politicians...' story on thisisjersey. It's something I agree with, and something I have been meaning to say since the election. Really this is the root of what Stuart is getting at when he says: "The government you deserve"...

Just a local
October 22, 2011 at 7:22 pm
17,538 people can’t be wrong can they? Of course not…those are the ones who have got the candidate they want. The problem is, those are the people who work in the finance, legal & public services that Sir Philip Ballache appeals to.

Its a sad indictment of Jersey that so many navigate their way through society with the same moral compass: The pursuit & worship of wealth, nepotism & cronyism over talent & hard work and most all, the stifling of dissent through a restricted press and the states.

Yes, the majority signed up for this but look at who is the majority now and don’t be surprised. The moral decay of Jersey has been happening for years, this is just a major signpost on the way to somewhere very bad indeed.


I'd go even further and say perhaps the behaviour of the local media, and the rule of the local oligarchy, isn't the cause of the island's problems but a symptom. Perhaps the truth is that this island is home to a lot - potentially even a majority - of people driven by dubious morals.

Please note I used the word 'people', not an abstract term like 'a culture' which can be easily distanced from.

It is people - in Jersey (although not always 'Jersey people') - who let child abuse happen. It is people - in Jersey - who have decided to offer services that allow others across the world to avoid paying tax in their natural jurisdiction. And it is people in Jersey - yes led by the JEP and the local BBC, but not compelled by them - who voted for that humongous berk Philip Bailhache.

It is almost certainly not any of us - those who visit Stuart's blog - but it was the people we walk among every single day.

Anonymous said...

Philip Bailhache. Make the most of your popularity.

Because this is the best it gets.

Anonymous said...

Anon "Perhaps the truth is that this island is home to a lot - potentially even a majority - of people driven by dubious morals"

The average Jersey person has, over the decades, increasingly become self-centred. This has happened because of the dominance of the finance industry and the accountancy and legal functions that support it.

It happened because of a selective filtration process whereby many of the smarter and more ethical with real moral compasses left the Island or did not participate. Conversely, those who were more yuppie or "me generation", with an associated lack of big altruistic ideas and behaviour, flocked from all over the place to come to Jersey to take the plentiful, but often dubious, jobs.

What then happened was that the public perception of the correct way to behave, and things to believe, got very skewed because of the preponderance of yuppie types. Most people will take their cues from the majority they see around them and over-ride any residual moral misgivings they may have in order to get ahead in their jobs to keep their families fed and the mortgage paid.

They don't even notice that they have become subtly corrupted and even see their new "common sense" views as growing up or maturing. They will criticise anyone who has held onto idealism and fairness as being somehow naive or crazy.

That is why such objectively weird (to an outsider) attitudes flourish in Jersey.

Anonymous said...

But they don't think their morals are skewed. After all they join in with the prevailing theme that Jersey society is the most charitable in the world.
The Trust Company allows a team Friday off to build a community play ground and they all buy a £300 raffle ticket for Jersey Hospice. So they're part of this great charitable island forgetting it is a greedy yuppyland.
But you will never find them reflecting on the injustices of the Jersey system. They look down on people attending an Attac or a Jersey Care Leavers meeting.

rico sorda said...

DEPUTY BOB HILL

RS

Anonymous said...

The two consecutive posts reproduced below need to be read by a far greater audience than merely this blog. They are written by one or two extremely perceptive persons.


Anonymous said...

Anon "Perhaps the truth is that this island is home to a lot - potentially even a majority - of people driven by dubious morals"

The average Jersey person has, over the decades, increasingly become self-centred. This has happened because of the dominance of the finance industry and the accountancy and legal functions that support it.

It happened because of a selective filtration process whereby many of the smarter and more ethical with real moral compasses left the Island or did not participate. Conversely, those who were more yuppie or "me generation", with an associated lack of big altruistic ideas and behaviour, flocked from all over the place to come to Jersey to take the plentiful, but often dubious, jobs.

What then happened was that the public perception of the correct way to behave, and things to believe, got very skewed because of the preponderance of yuppie types. Most people will take their cues from the majority they see around them and over-ride any residual moral misgivings they may have in order to get ahead in their jobs to keep their families fed and the mortgage paid.

They don't even notice that they have become subtly corrupted and even see their new "common sense" views as growing up or maturing. They will criticise anyone who has held onto idealism and fairness as being somehow naive or crazy.

That is why such objectively weird (to an outsider) attitudes flourish in Jersey.




Saturday, 22 October 2011 23:45:00 GMT+01:00
Anonymous said...

But they don't think their morals are skewed. After all they join in with the prevailing theme that Jersey society is the most charitable in the world.
The Trust Company allows a team Friday off to build a community play ground and they all buy a £300 raffle ticket for Jersey Hospice. So they're part of this great charitable island forgetting it is a greedy yuppyland.
But you will never find them reflecting on the injustices of the Jersey system. They look down on people attending an Attac or a Jersey Care Leavers meeting.

Sunday, 23 October 2011 09:21:00 GMT+01:00



What a shame that the above posts are not receiving wider exposure on 'This is Jersey' or better still, in JEP letters to the editor.

It looks like This is Jersey 'You Say' was deliberately altered in order to sabotage correspondence before the election. Now it looks as though it will stay that way. No more resumé page to make checking on updates easy and nothing new under 'Letters to the editor since 5th October.

I can envisage a migration of many posters onto this blog, where, I suspect, the moderator is less irrational.



A 'You say' Regular

Anonymous said...

"But they don't think their morals are skewed. After all they join in with the prevailing theme that Jersey society is the most charitable in the world"

It's true Jersey people are very charitable. That is one reason they, and the whole Jersey situation is so hard to criticise. That is why critics are seen as trouble makers who don't understand how wonderful people, and the system, here are.

This is probably over the top but an analogy could be that some (not all) aspects of Jersey's main industry look rather like the industrialist who gives ten per cent of his profits to charities for disabled children, which sounds very generous until one notices that his profitable business is actually manufacturing land mines.

Anonymous said...

They were written by 2 people. I I wrote about charity post after reading the one about the moral shift in the population.

To 'You say' reader....You have my permission to copy and paste my post.

I agree 'you say', the JEP was altered to sabotage correspondence before the election.
And,......It won't revert as it fits in neatly with the new regime!

Not so sure I'd want Staurt bogged down with more stuff to moderate. I'd like to think that a new alternative site is created. It needs to engage with the young and rest of us, it also needs to arranges meetings, public speaking etc.
I think its time we stepped away from our computers occasionally to discuss issues face to face. I think meeting is the next step.

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

A reader says:

"A legal requirement of elected representatives to be deferential to other elected political representatives, is more than a limit on free speech. It's likely to result in a systematic reduction of checks and balances, and will surely be used as a weapon against only those PB opposes. What hope can there be for meaningful scrutiny?"

That's exactly right.

And the problem is not only Philip Bailhache - but also his brother, Deputy Bailiff, William Bailhache.

Really - the FACAWS lapsed into a kind of terminal senescence when they let all this rip.

Protecting the Jersey oligarchy in suspending a good, honest Police Chief - for investigating criminality in government; mounting massed, illegal police-raids against opposition members of parliament - and searching their home without a search-warrant; letting Crown-Appointed Attorney Generals act with overt criminality; letting conflicted, bent judges make-up procedure as the go along, such as ruling "inadmissible" the entire defense-case,just as soon as the corrupt prosecution realised they had no answer to it - etc, etc, the examples go on, and on.

Well, if the people of Egypt, and Libya can gain the Rule of Law, so can we - even though we're fighting against a more subtle and pernicious regime, in the British establishment.

Stuart.

Anonymous said...

Stuart

"if the people of...Libya can gain the Rule of Law"

Are you seriously arguing that the NATO puppets of the NTC backed up by their Islamist lynch mob represent the 'rule of law'?

Anonymous said...

you last comment stuart dose that mean that words have not worked and it is now time to bear arms

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

A reader says:

"you last comment stuart dose that mean that words have not worked and it is now time to bear arms?"

Don't be a damn fool.

Stuart

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

A reader says:

"Are you seriously arguing that the NATO puppets of the NTC backed up by their Islamist lynch mob represent the 'rule of law'?"

What I am saying is that it is possible - against the seemingly highest odds - to bring about the removal from power of the most corrupt, lawless and dangerous of regimes.

In Britain, we have the opportunity to do that in a peaceful and lawful way, in respect of the protected mafia-state enclave of Jersey.

The way public administration is in this island - and its conduct - is monstrously and brazenly unlawful.

It's merely a case of having enough determination - to pursue legal claims far enough - against the UK Justice Secretary - to force the London authorities to stop acting unlawfully in failing to fulfill their legal duties, and instead to make them ensure the proper rule of law, good governance and proper administration of justice in Jersey.

All relevant law is already on our side. It's merely a case of getting it enforced.

As far as Libya is concerned, Gaddafi was a murderous and despicable thug. Sadly - unlike Egypt - it took force to overthrow him. I don't agree with violence personally - I take my examples for how to mobilise to achieve fundamental societal changes, from Mahatma Gandhi and Dr. Martin Luther King, but I wouldn't presume to judge the those Libyans who have lived under terror.

Stuart

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Just a brief message concerning my next appearance before what passes for a "judiciary" in Jersey.

Some readers thought it was tomorrow; it isn't.

The next "hearing" (more accurately termed a "silencing") will be at 2.30 on the afternoon of Wednesday 2nd of November.

The magistrate's court sessions are usually in the mornings, but they long ago decided to try and always schedule mine in the afternoon, so that they take place with only a few people in the public gallery.

In the normal sessions, the gallery is very crowded, with people waiting to have their speeding cases, etc dealt with, and there will often be friends there to support people.

The Jersey oligarchy live in fear of the way they always conduct these corrupt proceedings against me being witnessed live by large numbers of ordinary people, hence the "special" scheduling their repressions against me always receive.

So put that date and time in your diaries, and come along if you can. I know most people can't, because they're at work - but it always helps - for the historic record - to have a few people there as witnesses - like last time, when I was unlawfully prevented by Baker and Shaw from making my case.

Stuart

Anonymous said...

Does anyone know if there is any truth in the rumour that (dandara) are to lay off 100 workers??

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 243   Newer› Newest»